The problem with exotic pet ownership has been escalating over the years, especially in the last ten to fifteen years alone. Many state governments in the last couple years have been trying to pass laws and different measures to deal with this issues such as an Ohio lawmaker that is proposing a new law that would ban people from owning most exotic animals starting in 2014 (Weekly Reader News Addition) and in Tennessee where lawmakers pitch new exotic ownership rules which would ban the private ownership, import, sale and transfer of most wildlife--regardless of whether or not they are indigenous to the state (DVM Magazine). A few big problems with owning exotic pets is they are often really dangerous and many people cannot provide the type of environment that the wild animals need and the big problem that the media tends to focus on is when the owners let the pet go because it has gotten too big for them to handle or they feel they can no longer care for them properly. So the question becomes what kind of compromise can be met that satisfies both exotic pet owners that currently own exotic pets and what can be done to help curb the problem of pet owners let their exotic pet go when they can no longer care for them?
No more is this situation as evident than in the National Everglades Park in Florida where pythons and other extremely big snakes have wreaked havoc on the park because of owners letting them get into the wild or in a few cases the snakes escaping. Burmese python’s became so popular that in fact according to an article in National Parks by the summer of 2010 Miami, Florida was receiving 12,000 shipments of wildlife to be sold as exotic pets, Burmese pythons among them. They got introduced into the exotic pet trade in the 80s and then became a problem starting in early 2000 when many of the owners starting letting them go when they realized that the python could grow up to 13 feet and in some cases longer. Many believe Hurricane Andrew...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document