Preview

Examination of Mills and Dworkin

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examination of Mills and Dworkin
Examination of Mill and Dworkin
Looking at the legal status of drugs, and one's own liberty for that matter, I examined the works of Mills and Dworkin. There are many different views, and in the end, as in all philosophical issues, there is no one answer. It then boils down to which one, if either, of these two different points of view is correct. Each of the works is presented in the book Contemporary Moral Problems by James White. After careful examination of both views, I will discuss each and decide if Dworkin's criticism of Mill's is correct. To begin this essay one needs to understand the Harm Principle. The Harm Principle states that in order for one to be coerced they have to be inflicting harm on someone else. Mills is careful to say that harming someone else, by harming oneself does not count. Furthermore, Mills mentions that there are two types of persons that should not be included in the Harm: children and those adults who are unable to care for themselves (low mental capacities, low IQ). Although, the Harm Principle does allow for the use of persuasion, reason and sometimes threats.
So how does the Harm Principle apply to life? In class we used safety belts as an example. By not wearing a safety belt, one is only harming themselves and therefore should not be punished when they do not wear one. In regards to this essay the obvious example is drug use. Why have drugs be illegal if they do not harm anyone but the user? That is what we are about to examine. Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “Against the Legalization of Drugs,” by Peter de Marneffe, the argument that the use and possession of drugs needs to be decriminalized is made, because of the belief that the criminalization of drug use and possession violates the rights of citizens. In this paper, I will defend de Marneffe’s position by refuting a possible objection. Contrarians may claim that decriminalizing drugs will inevitably lead individuals to try harder and more dangerous drugs.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There has been a debate on legalizing drug use for quite some time now. Most legalizers are liberals, and their views on drug policy are consistent with liberal views on other issues. This paper will outline the liberal view of legalizing drugs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against America's Drug War

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over the past four decades, drugs use remains a very serious problem in the US, even though the drug war has made these substances less accessible. There are a lot of supporting views for the motion that government should legalize drugs, the reasons being: to spend less on war drugs, to make drugs more accessible to people and scientists in need of drugs, to collect tax revenues, etc. Two well-known professors and authors, Michael Huemer and Gabor Maté, argue, in their articles, against America’s drug war with two different approaches. Even though some might agree on Huemer’s point of legalizing drugs on the basis of individual freedom, I noticed some claims that I believe are not moral to the Kantian and Utilitarian point of views. On the…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The paper “Drug Prohibition: A Legal and Economical Analysis” by Walter Block agues for the legalization of addictive drugs such as marijuana, cocaine and heroin. It argues that there are no “market failures” which could justify the banning of these drugs, and also that, just like our current systems precursor the alcohol prohibition, the criminalization of these drugs increases crime, decreases respect for our law, and creates great social uproar. The main sections of this paper look at many sides of the argument. The second section of the article argues on the economical side, third being the libertarian view of law, fourth being objections and their rebuttal and finally the fifth, being an analysis of the benefits of legalization.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s position argument concerns the issue of recreational drug use. And by turning to one of the most influential moral theories, utilitarianism, I arrive at supporting ethical means founded simply on happiness. Maintaining the intrinsic value of human happiness is one of the most important aspects of universal utilitarianism. Self-determination, or the process of self-regulating decisions and actions, is another important aspect that utilitarianism concerns itself with. Therefore, as human beings, we should permit ourselves to the utmost freedom when selecting life courses. So if no one other than ourselves has a say in the decision, no one other than ourselves should suffer unintended damage.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author will attempt to briefly describe the philosophies of decriminalization, legalization and drug treatment. I will conclude with my opinion regarding the good and bad about these said philosophies.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalization Of Drugs

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this paper I will argue that prohibition of drugs is for the best and in the long run…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay on Drugs

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    micklethwait, B. (1994). why drugs should be legalised. why drugs should be legalised. London: Libertarian Alliance.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    essay - syria

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this essay I am going to discuss on why drugs should be yes SHOULD be legalised.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Exam Study guide

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages

    -The idea advanced by John Mill that a society should only concern itself with actions that pose a direct harm to others.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In "Against the legalization of Drugs", We've seen how James Q. Wilson says that Heroin and Cocaine should be kept illegal. Perhaps the strongest argument Wilson gives to support this claim, is that a government may rightly restrict an individual's liberty to prevent harm to others. Although this is in violation with an individual's freedom of thought and speech. In this paper, I will present two arguments from Kantian ethics and Douglas Husak that refute this idea, and further show that heroin and cocaine should not be kept illegal.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus Ethics

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill was a Utilitarian who believed that justice was a subset of morality and he claims that “Justice implies something which is not only right to do, and wrong not to do, but which some individual person can claim from us as his moral right”(Gray, 2011). He said that justice is not a moral standard and to determine justice we must look at the overall happiness of that individual. Mills argued that both positive rights and negative rights existed which helped individuals have a greater equality and self well being. Positive rights being education, food, housing and medical support. Negative rights were freedom of speech and to be allowed to follow any religion we desired.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Drugs Be Legalized

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his essay “Drugs”, Gore Vidal calls into question the legalization of drugs for three main reasons: not everyone will become addicted to drugs, crime will decrease with said legalization, and man has the right to make his own decisions, and do what he thinks is best for his life. Although Vidal wrote his essay in the 1970s, drug legalization is still a highly debated topic of today. Vidal wants his audience to agree with his logic, that drugs should be legalized, sold at cost, and properly labeled with side effects. The overall question here is whether or not the audience is convinced, the answer is no. Although Vidal makes many valid points, he fails to incorporate enough evidence to support his ideas.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    MT Project Paper

    • 4542 Words
    • 19 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's key contributions to economic thought are; The Theory of Liberty and Utilitarianism. His general idea on liberty showed that individuals are free to do what they want as long as he is not harming others. It is also acceptable if he harms himself but it is prevented if individuals did a serious harm to themselves that may also harm others and destroy property. We, individuals are intelligent enough to make decisions and choose any religion that we want. But government should intervene when it is for the protection of society. Mill's major contribution to utilitarianism is…

    • 4542 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this piece I plan to look at drug legalisation and how it would be a vastly positive thing around the world. Drugs are a sensitive subject. This is not a piece in support of taking drugs, nor is it an essay on the wonders of marijuana consumption. Instead it is simply a look at how much more stable and controlled our drug culture and general way of life would be if drugs were legalised. I will look at first of all the reasons why drug prohibition has failed and then at the thriving alternative that other countries have found: controlled legalisation. There are simply no positive reasons to criminalise any illegal drugs and I plan to show you why.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays