Evil Laws: Comparative Essay on “the Crucible”

Evil is the force in nature that governs and gives rise to wickedness and the sin that harms even the holiest of people. In “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, the nature of evil is revealed through the corruption of reverend Parris which ultimately leads to devastation of society and reverend Hales good intentions. During 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts, the witch trials begin as girls who were caught dancing in the forest pretend that they are under the influence of the devil. When the court is introduced in Salem many innocent people get accused of witchcraft so that the accusers can simply satisfy their own desires. Although both Parris and Hale are spiritual leaders, Hale shows integrity as he sticks for what his goal is, whereas Parris does not, showing his lack of integrity. Secondly, Parris’ selfishness takes his mind over as he consistently lies to get out of trouble, on the other hand Hale goes beyond his desires and attempts to do what is best for the society. Additionally, Parris does not establish truth nor justice as he never admits the girls are lying, but Hale tries everything to bring justice in Salem. It’s easier to commit sinful actions and blame someone else than to stand up and risk ones reputation to be a hero. Reverend Parris shows lack of integrity throughout the play as he is fearful to lose his reputation as a spiritual leader. As the court is in debate Parris says “Excellency, you surely cannot think to let so vile a lie to be spread in open court” (Miller 89). Here, Parris’ evil action is shown because he knows that there is no witchcraft but he is too fearful of losing his reputation by admitting that the girls are lying. His lack of integrity is shown as he is not being honest in the court. Furthermore, reverend Parris becomes more pathetic towards the end of the play as he continues to lack integrity and does not tell the truth even though he almost got killed by a dagger at his door step. While talking to Danforth, Parris explains