Preview

Evaluation of Wikipedia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
636 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluation of Wikipedia
When students are assigned research papers, very commonly, professors will say, “Whatever you do, do not use Wikipedia.” Many who research find this website credible, others believe its information is completely false. This essay will evaluate the efficiency of Wikipedia as an online resource for researching purposes; it will discuss the freedom to alter material, the credibility of the website, as well as what good comes from the use of this website for research means.
Many people believe Wikipedia is not a good, or credible, source to be used for research. Much of this comes from the possibility it gives for people to alter the content of any material information offered by the website. Wikipedia “enables any visitor to a wiki site to edit, add to, and even delete the content of any page on the site.”(Miller) This is factual because Wikipedia gives the opportunity for any person to edit information on any topic. For protection it is recommended that we “remember to take a cautious view of what we think it tells us.”(Miller)
The credibility of this website has decreased through the years thanks to professionals who have proved information in this website to be erroneous. This has obligated instructors who assign research assignments to restrict students from using this website as a source for information retrieval. Most teachers who assign research papers have as a goal to make students college ready in the sense of restricting students from plagiarism. “While supporting the goal of openness and verifiability, the username structure of the site provides complete anonymity for its editors and administrators, which renders the site constantly vulnerable to vandalism and fraud.”(Miller)
We’ve discussed a variety of cons that Wikipedia has when used as a research resource, but there are also some good in this fast-growing website. One good that Wikipedia has is the numerous amount of information on many different topics that it provides; regardless of the lack of



Cited: Miller, Nora. "Wikipedia Revisited." ETC: A Review Of General Semantics 64.2 (2007): 147-150. Academic Search Complete. Web. 21 Feb. 2013. Yaacov R. Lawrence, et al. "Patient-Oriented Cancer Information On The Internet: A Comparison Of Wikipedia And A Professionally Maintained Database." Journal Of Oncology Practice 7.5 (2011): 319-323. Academic Search Complete. Web. 21 Feb. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this article Wilson reaches out to fellow scholars to part take in improving Wikipedia for the better good of academics. Knowing that Wikipedia is not considered a legitimate source of information, he provides a logical solution to persuade educators, with facts, logic, and personal experience. I feel that Wilson was effective in conveying his message to his peers.…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each person has their opinion on what they feel about the credibility and reliability of Wikipedia. Some believed that Wikipedia is not a reliable source because anyone can create an account and update information whereas others may think that to be a positive aspect. They feel because anyone can create an account, this gives the opportunity for groups to come together (especially those that are very knowledgeable) and this in turn will develop a common resource of knowledge to be credible. Some will argue that Wikipedia is not reliable because it is not peered reviewed, but then some would say that Wikipedia is backed up with references at the end of the page which links to reliable information. There is an agreement between both sides that Wikipedia can be used as a quick informational page to gain some insight…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia's mission was to share the entire world’s information with everyone everywhere, anytime. A quotation of Jimmy Wales (the founder of Wikipedia) taken from his personal website said, "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That’s what we’re doing" (2013). Because anyone can edit information on Wikipedia, many different fields of knowledge can become part of the encyclopedia; it is very useful for getting a quick review of information. "Wikipedia isn't a commercial website. It's a community creation" (Wales, 2009). I personally us Wikipedia as a…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Paper. Wikipedia

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Launched on 15 January 2001, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that uses the web platform for online users to access. Boasting with over 26 million pieces of writing in 285 languages, Wikipedia has transformed to be a giant in the field of search engines optimization technology. The open source concept that it rides have made it cheap to access and a better choice for many online users. This is especially among the users who find it cumbersome to follow prolonged registration processes to access information on the internet. Any search term queried on the Google™ home page search engine will definitely give a hit from the Wikipedia site, and if not present, a prompt will request the user to create a page for such a term. In this way, Wikipedia has extended the public space for an open system where the public can have their inputs to extend knowledge regardless of their academic backgrounds, race, religion, sex or any other biases. To achieve correct information dissemination, Wikipedia has endeavored to make sure the uploaded information is open to scrutiny and changes due to the emerging data and facts. This way, they achieve by subjecting the information to peer reviews and editing platform that is open to all users, with the exception of some website pages that require an initial formal request to edit changes.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the website Wikipedia, under the source entry “Wikipedia” goes into detail about all the attributes and information about Wikipedia and how it came about and why it is a reliable site to get information from. Wikipedia has become the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet. Wikipedia is a reliable source because of its vandalism program in which it is able to detect and remove vandalism within a few minutes. Also with Wikipedia being a free online encyclopedia it allows for open structure, which lets the public write and change anything about any topic. On the Wikipedia website under the topic “Wikipedia”, found that “a non-scientific report in the journal Nature in 2005 suggested that for some scientific articles Wikipedia came close to the level of accuracy of Encyclopedia Britannica…”(preface). With that being said, it justifies that Wikipedia’s reliability is just as effective as that of a profitable encyclopedia that is written by experts.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    analyzes the controversy of using wikipedia as a reliable source. He states how its great for using…

    • 435 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. It contains millions of articles and depends mainly on volunteers and contributors to ensure that information are up to date. This is an open source that anyone can add and edit articles; so information may not always be accurate. It is the quickest and easier way to gain general knowledge on a specific topic. An encyclopedia is generally not a good source of reference in a paper; rather it can be a starting point in research the topic. The issue of reliability and credibility arises because of lack of credentials of editors, including biased view in content, articles are not peer-reviewed before publishing, source cited may be invalid, style, and tone lacks purpose. Some advantages of Wikipedia are clarification on topics and information is in clear simple terms for easy understanding.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Validity of Wikipedia

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is a great deal of information available on the internet. Search engines like Google and Yahoo make the world seem smaller and provide information in the masses at the click of a button. When it comes to higher learning, the creditability of a site is essential to the student when he is gathering information for a report or research paper. All higher learning institutions provide specific course readings, academic journals online and onsite libraries and many other tools as a means of gathering information. These tools give the student accurate and concise information he needs to construct valid research. One of the most important processes in the equation is making sure the information provided is properly sited in the report or research paper.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A quotation of Jimmy Wales (the founder of Wikipedia) "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That’s what we’re doing" (2004). Because anyone can edit it, there are so many different fields of knowledge that can become part of the encyclopedia; it is very useful for getting a quick compendium of information. I personally us Wikipedia as a jump off point for research but I do not use it as a source because, while anyone can review and edit Wikipedia, any review only takes place after whatever changes one makes are published to Wikipedia. Overall, I think that the founder’s mission has been…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The new age of computers and Web 2.0 is not a threat to the learning and progression of the human race. The scholarly process has not yet been perfected yet on the internet, but it is close enough to say that it does have enormous amounts of valid information. The collective mind that is the internet is a great resource for finding and giving information. Not all information is cited, but there is still a good chance that with enough feedback from other people that the information is still correct. The idea that anyone can voice their opinions on the internet is a great way to push human development to new heights. Wikipedia is one of the websites that Gorman attacked directly in his article. It is based around the idea of “user contributed content”. (Collis 15) Although the site does allow anyone to edit any page on the site, the pages are monitored by moderators that correct mistakes made in page credibility. In truth, everyone can be a moderator on Wikipedia to correct mistakes made as well as make updates to needed articles. The cost for Web 2.0 “based texts are much cheaper to produce”, because they are virtually stored. (Collis 15)…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, just because it has a lot of information doesn’t mean that it is all good information. Academic writing is a very accurate type of writing that can require many unbiased, reliable, credible, and relevant sources. I do not think all Wikipedia articles are held to these standards and so, I do not believe Wikipedia is an acceptable source for academic writing. Wikipedia is largely supposed to be an unbiased source by their own standards. However, not all articles are monitored enough to keep people’s biases from sticking through their writing.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays