Persuasive Argument Draft
Euthanasia: The Right to Die or Forced to Live?
What if you were terminally ill and no matter what treatment or medicines were given to you, they were not going to work. You are told that even through all of that, you are still going to die. Keeping in mind these treatments are extremely painful and the side effects from the medicines and the treatments are worse than having no medicines or treatments at all. What if there was a way to end it all, by ending your life. Should you not be allowed the right to end your own life? Should you be forced to suffer and live in pain and forced to pay for all the treatments and medicines? In Li Yan’s case, a 28 year old terminal cancer patient, euthanasia is her way out. She’s suffered from motor neuron disease since she was an infant, making her unable to do anything unassisted. Li spends hours at her computer, using the mouse her mother places her hands on to make pictures or uses her voice to control it (Arguments). She posted on her blog, “I treasure life, but I don’t want to live.” Euthanasia should be a legal practice because one should not be withheld the right to end their own life, whatever the circumstances may be.
The definition of Euthanasia as given by the Oxford English Dictionary is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease or in an irreversible coma (Kastenbaum). Another definition is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human for his or her alleged benefit (Arguments). It comes from the Greek, literally translating as a good death. There are several different definitions of euthanasia, along with several types. Voluntary euthanasia is when the person who has died has requested to be killed. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed made no request and gave no consent. Involuntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed made an expressed wish to the contrary (Arguments). Assisted...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document