Essentially, Euthanasia is “the right die”. Many people argue for Euthanasia being legalized stating things such as “whose life is it anyway?” and “my body, my decision.” Typically, Euthanasia is a subject brought up in accordance to terminal illness or being in a vegetable state. The argument for legislation of Euthanasia include that no one should have to suffer through the pain and deterioration of a terminal illness if they prefer to end their lives beforehand. Many believe that Euthanasia the humane solution to an irreversible declining health condition. On the other hand, you have many people arguing that Euthanasia is unethical and morally wrong. The argument over Euthanasia is complex; particularly when including the level of responsibility needed for the act. Many people against Euthanasia believe that if legalized, physicians would abuse of it. Many believe insurance companies would put extra pressure to Euthanasia than to pay for the more costly alternatives. Some even go as far as to classify euthanasia as ‘murder’.
Because patients select to die, their deaths end suffering, and there is no intention to cause harm, therefore, physician assisted euthanasia cannot be considered murder. Defined, murder is an act of violence which is perpetrated against a victim. A man being shot five times and dumped into a river would be an accurate example of a murder victim. The individual dies at a time which is forced by the killer who has intent to harm him or her. Frequently murder is painful and the person who is dying has not voluntarily decided to participate in his or her death. By its nature, murder is death by violence at the choice of the killer's rather than nature. Unlike murder, euthanasia is not an act of violence. Additionally, doctor assisted euthanasia is performed with the full consent of the patient. Murder steals life, while euthanasia gives the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document