Professional Ethics, Values and Legal Context.
“Consciously or unconsciously, social work thinking is, for the most part, sympathetic with the utilitarian modes of thought in that the work of a policy or action is measured against its tendency to produce ‘good’ results.” (Wilkes 1981, p.63) In this essay I will be discussing the ethical dilemmas that may occur in a social work setting, as a student social worker. I will look at the implications they may hold with regards to deliverance of services, and co-working relationships. Social work is about direction it’s based on social care professionals being advocates for individuals or groups of whom they work with in society, whilst providing services and promoting independence. As with any job social work has strict policies, protocols, guidelines, and procedures that the worker has to adhere to. In theory this is a logical investment for ensuring good working practice, however in reality these procedures often go against the views, opinions and rights of the service user. This can cause conflict between the worker’s personal values and professional commitment, as a worker you are bound to your work by legal duties failure to comply with legal frameworks can have severe implications that can affect the service being provided. Whereas personally you will address duties on a morality level dictating or altering your decision because of reasons such as common ground furthermore creating restrictions or barriers for the service user and organisation.
During research for this case study I have identified numerous legislative documents that can be used within this scenario however I will mainly be referring to the Human Rights Act 1998 as this act it states that there should be no discrimination with regards to obtaining access to services on grounds of disability, the right to marry or have a family, and that cultural and linguistic differences should be taken into account in the provision and delivery of services. This could be used in conjunction with the safeguarding of vulnerable groups act 2006 and the children’s act 1989. Government guidelines suggest that individuals with disabilities should be given assistance to support their families and parental roles. In this case the service user is CS of a Black British nationality, 36 years old and has a young family with children aged 4, 10 and 14, her partner CB is 38.
CS has an illness known as hydrocephalus which is fluid on the brain, henceforth the cause for concern and possible need for intervention. Recently it has come to light that CS has been losing ability in her cognitive and physical functions, although she needs assistance she is refusing intervention due to fear of losing her children. The GSCC Personal Cultural Social model should be used to determine any external issues or contributing factors warranting further need. Personal factors identified are the loss of responsible duties to her children, loss of bodily functions and her overall physical, emotional and mental state. Options such Person Centred Planning or family mediation should be made available to CS as a means of treatment and recovery. Social differences will be an area that CS and her family may need support with as there is an inconsistency of social interaction.
Power dynamics between the dominant and dominated social groups within our communities might be influencing the children’s or even CS’s perception this may be why CS is becoming isolated. Research suggests the major causes for divisions area associated in terms of race, gender, class, sexual preference, disability and age. Within the family there are various obstacles that can be speculated as being the crucial factor in CS deterioration in health, since the illness on her brain has not been classified as a mental illness as yet further investigation is required to determine whether CS has any legal rights under the Mental Health Act 2007.
In respect to cultural...