I do agree with Kierkegaard’s father’s teaching technique, for one can has choices to make every day and it is all dependent on fate to believe what is morally best. This can compare to virtual reality because anything can happen; one can decide either/or and choose what direction/fate of the path one desires.
2. Whom do you think Kierkegaard indentifies most with: the friend who doesn’t want to choose or Williams? Or perhaps both?
Kierkegaard in my view indentifies mainly on the friend who can’t choose between marriage. From a mans perspective Kierkegaard says it perfectly on either/or getting married or not your going to regret it. This excerpt shows that life is full of either/or decisions some obviously have a bigger outcome than others, however moral fate will decide where ones path will lead.
3. Compare the second excerpt with Sartre’s theory of the existential choice.
The second excerpt with Sartre’s theory of existentialism has relevance to the excerpt of Either/Or from Kierkegaard. In Sartre’s excerpt he states, we exist in the world with freedom to choose our path (Rosenstand, 2013). Existentialism is actually said to have originated with Kierkegaard, making a point that ones moral attitude determines how their direction fate will go. Many also live without a path of direction, fearing what can happen leads to a wrong path. This is what I can the man wearing a blindfold and letting ones existential and moral fate decide where he shall go.
References
Rosenstand, N. (2013). The moral of the story: An introduction to ethics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
References: Rosenstand, N. (2013). The moral of the story: An introduction to ethics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS RS 300 Foundation of Ethics: Morality and Justice FALL SEMESTER Introductory information Mission Statement Letter to Juniors Resources Revision of two Creation of 2 Directions: What is an Ethical Question / Levels of Questions/IPN 5 Think-Pair-Share/Active Listening Directives 6 Classroom Activities: The Jigsaw/Fishbowl Directives 7 Accessing on-line resources 8-9…
- 671 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The writer Soren Kierkegaard’s presents us with “Either/ or” an intense argument between two very different ways of life, the aesthetic and the ethical. Part Two presents us with an ethical Judge William tries to persuade the writer of the first part A to surrender his empty aesthetic life in substitute it for a more meaningful life, the life of ethicist. The clear difference between living an aesthete and the ethicist life, according to the judge is the ability the one posse to make a choice. According to Kierkegaard the ability to choose is “decisive for a personality’s and when it does not choose it wastes consumptively away” (Kierkegaard 62). Kierkegaard continues by saying that it’s not about choosing between good and evil but rather it’s the choice of recognizing either good or evil or none (Kierkegaard 66).…
- 1835 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, is a story that shows how weak people can be in the sense of loyalty. This loyalty, defined as putting strong will and strength into a relationship in all cases is being put into a light of making choices. This means you have to make the decision between Loyalty and "Friends", which also can be described as people that are together but basically are lonely for themselves and that decision-making is important.…
- 995 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Waller, B. (2008). Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings, and Contemporary Issues. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.…
- 1775 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Ascher leads up to and supports her idea with three examples – the box man chooses loneliness, and in contrast the two women whose loneliness seems unchosen. She supports these choices with specific details from Ascher’s observations – here is where you give details.…
- 801 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The excerpt of Sartre’s which talks about the theory of existentialism and it has some applicability to the excerpt of Either/Or from Kierkegaard. Sartre’s states that we live in a world with the liberty to designate the path that we are going to take. Existentialism actually emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of the will and it is known to be begun with Kierkegaard, which he makes the point that one’s attitude determines in which direction…
- 384 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Polman, L.P., & Fieser, J. (2012). Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.…
- 998 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In his play, No Exit, Jean-Paul Sartre examines basic themes of existentialism through three characters. The first subject, Garcin, embraces existentialist ideas somewhat. The second character, Inez, seems to fully understand ideas deemed existential. Estelle is the third person, and does not seem to understand these ideas well, nor does she accept them when they are first presented to her. One similarity amongst the three is that they all at some point seem to accept that they are in Hell for a reason.…
- 705 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Do you approve of Kierkegaard’s father teaching technique? Explain. Are there similarities between his techniques and virtual reality? Are there differences?…
- 662 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In No Exit, the biggest theme is the importance of life, consciousness, and existence. Sartre believed that, as being who are conscious, we are born as blank slates that have the ability to create our own purpose and bring meaning into our own existence. This person we create is recreated by every conscious choice we make and our choices are then held against us inevitably, as it is our responsibility to answer for our actions. This connects to the plays recurring theme of freedom and responsibility as it lays the foundation for both the characters’ setting and backgrounds. According to Sartre, choices are not attributed to psychology2, god, destiny, or social milieu; choices are a result of a person’s values and morality shaped by his freedom. Unfortunately however, these actions come with responsibility because it will inevitably affect other people. And so, there are no excuses for mistakes because you must answers to the consequences of your freedom, as Sartre once said, “Everyone is damned to be free” (Sartre). To many people, the ultimate consequence for your actions is hell and it is here that you experience the next of the main themes in the play, torture and suffering. All characters in the play seemed to have, like many of us, a preconceived notion as to what hell would be like and what kind of torture…
- 944 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Basic Ethics, Second Edition, by Michael Boylan. Copyright © 2009 by Michael Boylan. Published by Prentice Hall.…
- 519 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Known as the “father of existentialism,” Kierkegaard’s works emphasize mankind’s despair. In his book The Sickness Unto Death, published in 1849, Kierkegaard attempts to show how one is lost without God, and how one’s separation from God leads to sin or despair. Though Kierkegaard did incorporate the notions of God and sin into his works, his philosophy is still existential and influenced later existentialists, such as Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre, who were atheists. Existentialism emphasizes mankind’s state of being, and their need to explain the world around them, while at the same time not understanding it. This idea led to absurdism which stresses the absurdity that exists between man and the world. The…
- 3675 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Sartre is the third existentialist in the piece of literature that had to be read and is what the last cartoon is based off of. His idea was the most true of the three that was read and drawn about. The summary of his belief is you can do whatever you would like but no matter what you do, you will always have some form of consequence. The cartoon drawn about Sartre is a drawing about Icarus and the flying incident. This shows how when Icarus flew…
- 485 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One major difference between the two is that Sartre is an atheist. This metaphysical position is the basis for many of Sartre's existentialist opinions on other aspects of philosophy. To further explain, the fact that there is no God, leads to the fact that there is no such thing as human nature, and no common ground on which we would all be able to relate. In other words, human nature cannot be defined in advance, because it has not been thought out in advance by some higher being who would have created mankind. The fact that human nature does not exist indicates that each person's meaning in life is discovered on his/her own, and each person forges his/her own destiny. With this active role in life, each person retains an individual burden which affects all others. Sartre wrote, "Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does," and "Our responsibility is much greater than we might have supposed, because it involves all mankind." Both of these quotes reflect this aspect of liberty and consequence which one faces.…
- 1060 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Ruggiero, Vincent Ryan. Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues. 6th Ed. New York : McGraw-Hill…
- 2107 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays