Assume you are an experienced judge who is delivering a lecture to first-year judges. Take a position for or against this claim: Criminal justice would be far more effective it focused primarily on restorative justice. Support your position with examples. I feel that it would be more beneficial if the victim and the offender be able to meet. This gives the victim an opportunity to ask the offender question to why they did that to them. It also helps with the healing process for the victim as well as the victim. Assume you are a lawyer for a man accused of assault on his domestic partner. Take a position on this statement: Empathy should be part of the criminal justice system. Explain your position. No, because many times, when we used empathy we set ourselves up for disappointment within the community. We need to make sure that every situation is done the same way so no one will be confused out the decision the courts make. Rights are moral principles that define man’s freedom of action within society. I think that individuals’ right are granted by the government and include life, liberty, and property, freedom of speech, religion, and press. Every person has individual rights. No one should be threaten the public due to individual rights. It’s kind of hard to balance them because some countries have where their citizens so not have rights at all and the government may not care. I believe that everyone should be given the indivuals right but shouldn’t have endangered or threaten public protection because that it falls under the bill of rights and it wouldn’t be rights. My approach is that if citizens have rights then they should have public protection because they are the public they should be protected. All people should be respects and well treated as individuals concerning the constitution and the bill of rights.
I think that there is an argument whether rewards should be used in the criminal justice field of if just to use punishment. When a criminal...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document