Preview

Ethical Issues in Pharmacy Research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Issues in Pharmacy Research
Ethical Issues in Pharmacy Research Reflection
There is abundant evidence showing how easy it is to exploit individuals in the history of medical research in the twentieth century. It was not until the early 1960s when the public began to take notice of the ethical neglect that researchers had for their subjects. The exposure of gross abuses in medical research generated a public furor that was finally noticed by those who administered research funding which enabled changes to policy to begin to take place such as the Declaration of Helsinki which addressed the issue of independent review of research protocols by a committee not associated with the project.
It is enough to make one sick when you look at the unethical medical research that has taken place in the United States alone. In the name of “research” there has taken place many clinical experiments that have been done unethically. In the 1940s several “research” studies where done using either patients from state insane asylums or from prisons. These studies ranged from injecting patients with experimental flu vaccines to malaria and hepatitis. All of these studies were federally funded. The “Nuremberg Code” was established as a set of international rules to protect human test subjects after the prosecution of Nazi doctors in 1947. However, many American doctors ignored them, arguing that they applied to Nazi atrocities, not to research they were doing. By the 1960s, more than half of the states allowed for prisoners to be used as human guinea pigs for medical research.
However, two studies would come to light in the 1960s which would turn public attitude about the use of humans in research. The first study was done at Brooklyn’s Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in New York.1 The researchers injected cancer cells into 19 old, debilitated patients to see if their bodies would reject them. The patients were not told what they were being injected with because the researchers believed the cells harmless.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is because a human life is valued more than any other subject used in clinical trials. In order to ensure the efficacy and legitimacy of treatment, human subjects are the most accurate compared to animals. Human subjects cultivate concrete information and data necessary for the improvement of medicine and health care as a whole. Baillie, McGeehan, T.M. Garrett, and R.M. Garrett (2013) stated, “…human experimentation is necessary for medical progress. Animal testing is useful, but it cannot provide the final word on either safety or efficacy” (p. 300). On the contrary, this does not excuse the researcher from disregarding a clinical participant’s life and safety. According to Baillie et al. (2013), humans are not objects that are used however the researcher desires (p. 293). Human experimentation, conversely, has a long history of abuse. Many rules and guidelines have been set in place to prevent researchers from taking advantage of human subjects all in the name of “science”. Due to these unfortunate events, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have been established to protect and oversee the organization and conduction of human experimentation (Baillie et al., 2013). One historical event that led to the development of stringent biomedical experimentation rules and guidelines was the Tuskegee syphilis research experiment (Head, 2012). This experiment was widely acknowledged and is known as…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, scientists have done very unwise and unimaginable experiments with humans as the test subject. Like in 1932, the public health service was working to find treatment for syphilis in the african american race.They had 600 black men, 399 with syphilis and 201 that did not have the disease. Without the patient's knowing that they were contracted with syphilis, scientists told the men that they were being treated for “bad blood”. But really they were not given the right treatment to cure their illness. Also in exchange the men received free medical exams, free meals, and burial insurance, which is like life insurance. But in 1968 this research raised concern for peter buxton and others, so they wrote a news article about what these…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics and Pharmacare

    • 2854 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this paper I will analyze and assess legal and ethical modifications on marketing relations as it relates to both consumers and organizations. This research will analyze three to five ethical issues that relates to marketing and advertising, intellectual property, and regulation of product safety. The discussion of arguing for or against Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) marketing by drug companies will also be analyze. This paper will also determine who regulates compounding pharmacies under the current regulatory scheme, what the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) could/should have done in the PharmaCARE scenario and whether the FDA should be granted more power over compounding pharmacies.…

    • 2854 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mkultra

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When looking at human experimentation during the twentieth century the nations that come to mind are Japan, where scientists amputated limbs from subjects only to reattach them to other parts of their bodies; Russia, where the Soviets tested odorless poisons on prisoners with the goal being not having it detected postmortem; or most infamously Nazi Germany and the heinous experimentation performed on the Jews. What most don’t realize however is the United States has its own history of unethical “studies”, “vaccines”, and “projects”. One such was the MKULTRA project, which has become notoriously known for carrying out some of the most unusual and sometimes inhumane experimentation financed by the American government.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the past, before the government regulated experimentation on humans and prior to patients’ having to give consent to be involved in studies that could potentially harm them, many doctors and researchers took advantage of these people. The poorest and most illiterate of populations were recruited for experimental medical studies that were invasive, harmful and could result in death. These were the people they believed would not object and would not realize that what was being done to them was wrong.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot mentions animal experimentation. Different kinds of animals are used in many different experiments. Most experiments are used to help humans more than to help animals. Animal experimentation should not happen because most of the time, experiments can lead to animal cruelty. Cloning is one example of an experiment.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rammy Mekhilef Mr. Drake H Lang and Comp April 20th, 2009 Animal Testing for Research ' Pro side The death of one dog vs. saving the life of many diabetic humans. Which would you pick? Diabetes caused many deaths before insulin was discovered from the pancreas of a dog. After insulin was discovered, it could be injected into the bloodstream to keep the insulin level high. Along with this, much of our medicinal discoveries are experimented on different types of animals. Many people support the banning of experimentation of animals but what they are really supporting is the hindering of scientific advancement. We would not be where we are today without futuristic discoveries without making few sacrifices. One of these sacrifices is the lives of animals. As long as the animal has the capabilities of providing new information, and is not an endangered species, it should have approved usage in science laboratories and departments. Scientific testing on animals should be legal because it provides valuable information, it is safer, and it develops medicinal discoveries. A lot of valuable information comes from testing medicine and other sciences on animals. “Testing drugs in animals before doing so in humans helps researchers find potential toxic side effects, as well as understand the metabolism of drug compounds and consequent effects seen throughout the body” (Cook). Scientists rather would have toxic side effects appear on animals rather than the drug appearing on the market with people unaware that the drug is actually harmful. Also, animal testing is surprisingly one of the most advanced types of research we have today. Other methods are not advanced enough because researchers do their best to keep the kill count low, while also being beneficial to science. Only 6% of animals who are used for research actually experience pain (Animal Testing Facts: Home). Science research should be tested on animals because it is much better than being tested on humans and…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While organ donation has increased with the development of brain death criteria the diligence need in order to protect the patient has as so grown. Following the organizations Policy and Procedures step by step in order to make the…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some have argued that money and time should be spent looking for alternatives to animal testing. The British association for the advancement of science said, “Much basic research on physiological, pathological and therapeutic processes still requires animal experimentation. Such research has and will continue to provide the essential foundation for improvements in medical knowledge, education and practice.” (Alhous 1)…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Dilemmas

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay will discuss the dilemmas of testing drugs on human beings, as well as the dilemmas once we shift testing drugs on animals. There are several ethical dilemmas when it comes to testing drugs on people in general. A number of the tests can be potentially life threatening. The new drugs may cause severe reactions which might not be treatable later on. For years, scientists have been experimenting on humans.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common for labels on the back of medication bottles to read “not tested on animals.” Animal testing has been proven to be cruel and unusual punishment. Some studies have suggested that the testing of products on animals had no relevance or solid reasoning behind it. Imagine humans taking the place of animals and being deemed a science project. In the early 1900’s medical research was still on the rise and resources for medical treatment and testing was limited. Studies were comprised of the actual subject. In many cases the subject was a human being that was under the microscope for a rare or unexplainable disease.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “One of the most important jobs the Cruelty Free International science team does is encourage regulators to accept and promote alternative methods to animal testing. Almost every type of human and animal cell can be grown in the laboratory.” Scientists have even managed to coax cells to grow into 3D structures, such as miniature human organs, which can provide a more realistic way to test new therapies. Human tissue can be donated from surgery (e.g. biopsies, cosmetic surgery and transplants). For example, skin and eye models made from reconstituted human skin and other tissues have been developed and are used to replace the cruel rabbit irritation tests. “Companies such as Episkin, Mattek and CellSystems GmbH now produce these tests in easy to use kits for companies to use to test their cosmetics and other substances.” Less high-tech studies for nutrition, drug addiction and pain can also be carried out on consenting humans in the interest of advancing medical science. These studies can help replace animal tests. We are told that insulin therapy would not have been discovered unless animal researchers had removed the pancreas from dogs in the 1920s. But like other areas of medical research, the important clues actually came much earlier from observations of human patients. Running experiments on animals may be less morally ambiguous than releasing…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, a much debated topic is whether animals should be used in medical experiments or not. Supporters, including professors, and research scientists in laboratory medicine, believe that using animals as experimental subjects is essential to drug research. In particular, they believe animal experiments help humans discover drugs that slow the progress of the human immunodeficiency virus. They think it is the most effective method to confirm the safety of the drugs, to avoid losing people’s lives, and to save the research funding. In their opinion, human lives would be jeopardized without animal experimentation. However, in fact, animal testing is not an exactly correct method to solve the medical problem, not only because it is ineffective and unnecessary but also because it is immoral and ignores animals’ rights. For these reasons, animals should not be used in medical experiments.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Human Body

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals have been used in research since as early as Aristotle’s time. Since a majority of information on toxicology is based on animal testing, it is difficult for scientists to find complete replacements that can adequately represent the human body and ensure the safety of those who use the products being tested. Those in favor of animal testing, argue that experiments on animals are necessary to advance medical and biological knowledge. Geoff Watts, a freelance science and medical writer and broadcaster, states, “Most non-animal methods have been developed within the scientific community and for scientific reasons, he adds. Many are complementary to existing animal tests rather than direct replacements. They may reduce rather than eliminate the need for animal procedures” (Watts 2). Watts, along with many other scientists conclude that although animal testing has yet to be eliminated, it can most definitely be reduced.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, scientific research is fallible; there can never be a full guarantee of success. If the results of the research fail to yield beneficial and accurate results, the high price at which the research was conducted – the sacrifice of human lives- would have been in vain. In 1915, a doctor working for the U.S. Public Health Office injected twelve Mississippi inmates with Pellagra in an attempt to discover a cure for the disease. Eventually failing at his experiment, the twelve inmates suffered through a slow and painful death during which approximately 132 methods of treatment were tested on them, none of which made any useful contribution to finding an effective cure for the disease. This also goes against articles 2, 5, 6 and 10 of the Nuremberg Code, which states that “Permissible medical experiments should yield fruitful results, and should not cause death or disabling injury. In the event that the experiment is likely to cause disabling injury or death, the process has to be halted immediately. Scientists should never value the importance of beneficial scientific results above risk.” Since there is always a margin of error in scientific research, there will always be a chance that human lives will be sacrificed in vain. Sacrificial acts, especially ones that involve something as sacred as human…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays