Preview

Essay in Chemistry: Nuclear Power Plant

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay in Chemistry: Nuclear Power Plant
Before I express my side if I’m in favor of nuclear power and nuclear power plant here in the Philippines, let us first be aware of what is a nuclear power plant. Nuclear power is the use of sustained nuclear fission to generate heat and electricity. Nuclear power plants provided about 5.7% of the world's energy and 13% of the world's electricity, in 2012. In 2013, the IAEA report that there are 437 operational nuclear power reactors (although not all are producing electricity, some are idle for maintenance or long term shutdown due to safety concerns), in 31 countries. With more than 150 naval vessels using nuclear propulsion having been constructed. Now that you know all about nuclear power, next is why am I anti with the nuclear power plant in the Philippines. The following are my reasons why I won’t agree.
First of all, the most important thing is nuclear power is a not clean energy, why is it not clean energy, because in this power plant there is a difficulty of waste disposal. Whenever pictures of nuclear power plant we commonly see dirty smoke coming out from the plant and it’s indeed can harm the environment contributing to the global warming. We all know that Philippines is composed of 7,107 beautiful and paradise-a-like islands, a sanctuary of the natural gifts that God gave. Just think of the effect of nuclear power plant to the nature here in our country.
Second reason, nuclear power plant is one of the most devastating accidents a place could have; these plants cannot guarantee us safeness that we needed. Just like Chernobyl, it all began with an accident, but what its effect, the misery of the people living in Chernobyl. Now, the place is like a ghost town, lifeless. Danger of exposing to radioisotopes or harmful rays that are emitted from the exploded reactor 4of the plant; people leave the place for safety. If this plant would be here in our country and have also, not hoping, an accident, maybe, just maybe, Philippines will be dead in all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear power plants are much safer for people and the environment. Between 1971 and 2009, nuclear power prevented an average of over 1.8 million net deaths. It has also reduced carbon emissions by 64 gigatonnes over the same period, generated by coal power worldwide. (Kharecha) So many deaths occur due to coal power because of the mining process, on top of all the wastes produced after combustion. Along with being the main contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, coal combustion wastes also result in acid rain. (Olive) The popula…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power plants do not release harmful carbon dioxide into the environment like the fossil fuels that are mostly used. Therefore, it can actually help with the problem of global warming around the world and even here. Nuclear power plants are also considered more reliable since they do not depend on the wind or the sun in order to produce energy. This means that nuclear energy can provide a more reliable base load of energy even when the demand for energy is very high like during the summer months when everyone is using their air conditioners.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First off all, what is the nuclear? Many countries use nuclear energy to generate electricity. “Unclear is the energy stored in the center or the nucleus of an atom. After we bombard the nucleus into two parts, two different elements are formed along with the emission of high energy. The process generally followed is called fission. Fission is the chain reaction which needs uranium-235.”(“Fission and fusion”)The nuclear energy is considered as the worthiest alternative resource of energy after fossil fuels, but it also has a lot of potential problems.”(“Nuclear Energy”)…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which is why the earth’s temperatures are rising. Nuclear power plants release steam vapour which is better for the environment, because as it cools and condenses, it turns back into water. When the water is being turned to steam within the power plant, it doesn’t become radioactive. The power plant is designed so that the water doesn’t become poisoned, and that the water returns to the environment, more of less how it was before. Port Augusta has an abundance of water, and a power plant will draw people to the region, so why shouldn’t Port Augusta have a nuclear power…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power’s bad reputation has come about due to the accident at nuclear plants such as Chernobyl in Ukraine, Fukushima in Japan and Three Mile Island in the USA. Chernobyl was one of the only ones out of three that has been classified as a “major accident” by The International Atomic Energy Agency; the other was the accident at Fukushima. The reason the Chernobyl accident was considered a “major accident”, was due to the emergency shutdown failing, with a full melt down being achieved. This area is not able to be populated ever again due to the extreme…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Though we have had worries and issues on how to handle our power situation in the future, nuclear power has always been a sparkling prospect. It has been gleaming there just waiting to be tapped. After the bombs and destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the world started to explore other avenues to use the science and power of atoms and came to discover nuclear power. Although this technology seemed like a god sent, there are inherent problems with the use and deployment of nuclear power. These problems have the potential to cause significant loss of life. In fact they have caused the loss of life before. Due to these issues, nuclear policy has always been a hotbed of debate. In actuality only several of the hundreds of reactors in existence have had problems. The first noteworthy accident and the one that will be discussed today was the accident at the Three Mile Island complex, here in the USA. Another accident occurred several years after at the Chernobyl compound. This accident which took place in the former USSR is the worse reactor accident to date and massive casualties were incurred. In addition to these; the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, which occurred earlier this month has put several reactors there in potentially an even worse place than Chernobyl. Focusing on Three Mile Island, this almost horrific accident occurred in the late seventies and was very close to going super critical (i.e. that is melting down). This accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear complex has greatly affected the United States of America and international nuclear policy. In the USA no reactors have been built since this accident. The accident reignited people’s fears of nuclear power. Stepping back for a minute, nuclear power first started evolving in the 1950’s. While research in this area had been done well before the fifties it was all for the purpose of academic and military use. This…

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, nuclear power is too expensive. For instance “Many supporters and critics say nuclear power biggest impediment is economic.”(8,8) Even people who agree with nuclear power agree that the cost is too high the amount of workers and materials that will be needed and how long the process is too much money for the economy. Like this quote states “But in reality is wasting yet more time and money pursuing the nuclear nightmare would be, too expensive, too risky.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with the advantages of nuclear power, there are also some disadvantages, which we must consider. These may have a very negative effect on our future and other generations to come.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear power does have its downfalls but it also has its assets . One major benefit while using nuclear energy is that is pollutes the air far less than fossil fuels do. As you may have heard there have…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paper 1

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2012 nuclear power was the source of 12.3% of the worlds energy demand in electricity (NEI) produced by 436 nuclear power plants in 30 countries world wide. For fourteen countries the supply in nuclear power surplused one fourth of the country's demand in energy. They are currently 73 nuclear power plants under construction in 15 different countries. Projections for the source of energy vary from parts of the world, from East Asia (South Korea) who is expected to have the largest growth by 2030, compared to Western Europe which is expected to decline in their dependance of nuclear energy as a main source of power by 2030. A couple of facts that make Nuclear power a viable alternative to more traditional power production such as coal or gas are that, nuclear power generates more energy for less money, compared to solar of wind plants. The nuclear power plants are more safer compared to natural gas or coal production plants. There are sufficient reserves of uranium for the forceable future of humans kind. There is less radioactive waste then people think of, last year the US got ride of a 1000 times more EPA-registerd waste like mercury and PCB's etc. All in all there is a deeply rooted notion in the mind of the every day person that nuclear power is the main lead to human made catastrophes, when it…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Nuclear power today is a developing and important technology, and despite its environmental setbacks, it remains a source a strong source of power.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear science

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The nuclear energy plants uses five steps of energy transfer; Nuclear energy, heat energy, steam energy, kinetic energy and electrical energy. While the Nuclear energy works it powers the nuclear plant creating nuclear energy, transferring to heat energy in the coolant, potential energy from steam moves the turbine with kinetic energy from the turbine then produces electrical energy by spinning the turbine using steam. This process produces less environmental pollution than coal energy; which is a popular energy that is cheap and easy to use but also dangerous because of the amount of pollution it could produce along with the energy, but it does create chemical waste that needs to be stored with caution underground, it also doesn’t create green house or acid rain effect. Using Nuclear energy not only deducts the chance of global warming, but also could generate a…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays