Name: Tran Hoang Minh
Student number: L9918889
Critical Response to Esperanto
With the considerable development of the globalization, there are an increasing number of cross-cultural communication breakdowns, which can lead to conflict and war easily and one of the main reasons is language barriers. To solve this problem, a Polish doctor created Esperanto to facilitate communication between people from different cultures. While some people believe that Esperanto is an ideal replacement of English, many others are against it. To clarify this problem, Yan Rado has written “Esperanto, The Hope Of The World” (Esperanto – The way Forward Conference, June 2011) to exhort people to learn Esperanto as the world’s second language. Nonetheless, in the article “What’s the point of Esperanto” (The Language Journal, 2011), Dr.Angla Sola argues that Esperanto will not be able to become a global language in the future. The aim of this essay is to critically response to the two authors’ arguments. In his article, Rado believes that Esperanto’s neutrality and simplicity can help unite the world. In Rado’s opinion, it is much easier to learn Esperanto than other national languages due to its simple grammatical rules. Furthermore, he also notes that another advantage of learning Esperanto is a lack of cultural identity. While English is a language of England, which used to be a colonial country, and the USA, which controls the global media and technology overwhelmingly, Esperanto does not belong to any cultures or countries. Thanks to that, Esperanto speakers can communicate equally. In Sola’s article, she claims that Esperanto cannot compete with English as the world’s lingua franca. Sola notes that Esperanto is not neutral because it is affected by European languages. Therefore, it is easier for European people to learn Esperanto than the Asian counterparts. Moreover, she states that learning Esperanto is a waste of time because it is not still...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document