Preview

Enemy of the People

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enemy of the People
ESSAY: AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE
Harry Latirofian

07/SP_CORE_1006_22 The Global Challenge

An Enemy of the people is a drama filled with ethical dilemmas and issues that are largely were caused by the contrasts between the Stockmann brothers. Thomas Stockmann is jovial by nature and likes to be surrounded by people like him that are intelligent and hard working. His brother in other hand is a representative of the conservative world-order. Thomas Stockmann or as he referred in play as Dr. Stockmann is very conscious of his duty as a citizen and he isn’t afraid to go against the mob of arrogant people, which are the majority in that town, and to point out that they are in denial: “Dr. Stockmann: …The majority has might on its side--unfortunately; but right it has not. I am in the right--I and a few other scattered individuals. The minority is always in the right.” (pg. 71, Act IV), but Peter Stockmann, on the other hand, is the person who can sway the mob to his side, by saying what the mob wants to hear. We can see more clearly the difference between two brother if we would consider their’s personalities from the deontological point of view. One is a doctor, who would have to give a Hippocratic Oath in order to practice and it is well known that one of the key elements of the Hippocratic Oath is to help people with all your knowledge: “…. I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.”(Hippocratic Oath). And the other one is the politician, who had to step over many people in order to get the position that he has, such people as Morten Kiil: “Well, it wouldn't be a bad thing. It would just serve them right, and teach them a lesson. They think themselves so much cleverer than we old fellows. They hounded me out of the council; they did, I tell you--they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The topic which I have investigated is Saviour Siblings. The term ‘Saviour Siblings’ is given to process of someone having another child of the same genetic material to save another existing child’s life. The topic of Saviour Siblings is very conversational as it raises many ethical dilemmas and disagreements between different religious principles and viewpoints. In this essay I will explore wheather or not different religious/ moral principles are a hindrance to medical ethics.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many parallels that can be found between Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People and Steven Spielberg’s Jaws. Both follow respected men who go against authority and majority opinion to save the lives of the people around them. These productions are iconic in their field, but it is not because of their story but because of their message: Tyranny of the Majority and Dangers of Ignorance. In An Enemy of the People there is pollution in the water, in Jaws, Spielberg chooses to poison the water with sharks. Before the realization of the poisons in the water, both of their jobs had been relatively calm and nothing tragic had happened in either towns. In both of these works there is political satire that caused the immediate hatred of both productions, now they are regarded as ingenious pieces…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gilman Yellow Wallpaper

    • 6339 Words
    • 21 Pages

    If a physician of high standing, and one’s own husband, assures friends and relatives that there is really nothing the…

    • 6339 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enter here Envision a middle aged man that the night before had sat down with his family for dinner. This same man is now being told to do horrific things in the name of his country. Is this man a monster or is he just an ordinary man. This is what is up for debate in Bowing’s book Ordinary Man. Browning state that he believes that these are just ordinary men and throw a variety of different reasons they were forces and overall persuaded to commit awful acts against fellow human beings. There is proof that he was correct that these were just ordinary men. It also might be surprising that this book would show that most if not all men could ultimately come to do the awful actions described thought out the book.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosi Fan Tutte

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the group an individual is associated with doesn’t accept them, this may cause them to feel unwanted and unable to move forward in life. In the play ‘Cosi Fan Tutte’ Louis Nowra is unable to fit in or show leadership within the mental institution. This is displayed through the characters vulgar language “Couldn’t direct a poofter to a man’s dunny.” The use of inhibited directness in “poofter” shows the character of Doug doesn’t know how to act around ‘sane’ people and this directness of the word ‘poofter’ shows the groups’ truthful feelings toward Lewis. This is further emphasised by humour in “For killing an actor he’d get life, for killing a director he’d get eternal gratitude.” Roy’s criticism toward Lewis is evident throughout the entire play, and causes Lewis to feel degraded and put down. When an individual begins to come to terms with the cards they’ve been dealt, they may move forward in not only their career, but also their initial self.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Villains of All Nations

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Villains of All Nations is book written by Marcus Rediker that follows the origins of the pirate boom before and after the War of Spanish Succession. The book covers infamous pirates like Bartholomew Roberts, William Fly, and Edward Teach also known as Blackbeard.It discusses the grim environment of working the seas for the government, what lead many people to turn to piracy, the tale of the first women pirates Anne Bonny and Mary Read, how piracy impacted slavery, the pirates bonds of brotherhood under the Jolly Roger, and the events that lead to the death of the pirate era itself.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current oath was more of what I expected, being that there are more modern words and the piece is more fitting to this day in age, although the original is very similar. At one point the writing mentions, “I will not be ashamed to say "I know not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.” I think this is an important aspect in the Oath because people should feel they are able to ask for help, especially if it is for the benefit of the patient’s recovery. Not asking questions and not knowing how to handle situations, can result in life-threatening conditions for the patient. Another aspect that stood out to me says, “I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know.” Personally I think this is one of the most important principles of the medical practice. Patient confidentiality is not only moral respect for the patient, but also builds a bond of trust between the patient and doctor. Individuals can be reluctant about giving out their information, in fear that it will affect their reputation, relationships, lifestyle, etc.. Altogether, the modern Hippocratic Oath is a well written pledge that holds many significant reminders and principles to help someone be successful in the medical…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ethical dilemma for physicians begins with the Hippocratic Oath they take. The classical version of the Hippocratic Oath in medicine has various requirements for physicians. Among those, the physician is required to state that: "I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to that effect," (Hosseini, 2012).…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible the audience is supplied with an array of varying characters. Arthur Miller effectively categorizes the characters of the play into two juxtaposing categories; the accusers, and the accused. The accusers are led by the antagonist of the play, Abigail Williams, whereas the accused are led by the protagonist of the play, John Proctor. The audience sympathizes with John Proctor not only because he has been falsely accused, but also because he is a representation of the human condition. In contrast, Miller causes the audience to despise the accusers in order to exemplify the injustice of McCarthyism.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet Marxist Criticism

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout the entirety of Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, if one looks carefully, one can see many aspects of Marxist thought prevalent in the story. To effectively analyze a story through a Marxist critical lens, the reader needs to pay close attention to how characters of different classes interact with one another, especially in respect to class oppression and social inequity, particularly if the actions or words of a character talk of rebellion against the upper classes. “To Marxist critics, a society's economic base determines the interests and styles of its literature; it is this relationship between determining base and determined superstructure that is the main point of interest for Marxist critics” (Abele). The analyst must also recognize to what social class the author belongs and how that might affect the portrayals of certain characters. The way in which different classes in Hamlet interact, along with how the society is actually structured, are the driving forces behind the events in the play.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion Argument Analysis

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the first chapter Fineman poses the question “Who is a person?”. The answer seems to be something so simple, yet it is very complex. The topic deals with humans rights given in the constitution. The question has always been prominent in our society because the founding fathers wrote a constitution the did not fit all Americans. The constitution was written for the white male. African Americans and women did not have these rights until later on in history. The question also is apparent in the abortion argument, Gary Bauer a prominent figure in the Pro-life movement fights to say unborn fetuses are people. The meaning of a person and who deserve constitutional is expanding. In history it wasn't always so easy and people had to fight for their…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Ku Klux Klan people haven 't gotten out of the idea the black people…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two kind of the leaders in the world, one for the greater good and one for the greater evil. In this book the author portrays the evil Adolf Hitler during WWII in Jack Merridew. He was shown as the outcast , the one no one wanted. He took over with force and became chief just like how adolf Hitler did. Both of the characters resemble the evil and greed that's going on in our world. They both preyed on the weak and took over when no one paid attention.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The conflict created when the will of an individual opposes the will of the majority is a recurring feature of drama.”…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henery Essay

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry begins his speech assertively with “No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as the abilities of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; …I should speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve.” Immediately, Henry implements Pathos. Henry is aware that in order for a group of irritated colonist to believe him, he must first present himself as honorable. Henry beckons the audience more with, “Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, …the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.” Personality, seasoned with the refusal to wither the truth-despite others opinions- and enveloped in religious assertiveness, allows for the acceptance of ideas intertwined with the openness to change.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays