Fantastic writers sometimes shake up the recipe and add some zest to their work for entertainment or even as a diversion to our audiences. What boggles my mind about this play is the fact that it became such a vital piece in the production of “Tragic Comedies.” Think about all the crazy thoughts you personally have, your reaction to this, and your thoughts after reading this classic play? Did you have erratic thoughts even for a moment about the crazy setting, the strange characters and their relationships? In this paper, I will be discussing some examples of the humor, the setting, and my thoughts on how Samuel Beckett came to write his thoughts on an “eternal master piece.” The characters in “The Endgame” are as listed below: CHARACTERS: Hamm - unable to stand.
Clov - servant of Hamm; unable to sit. Nagg - Hamm's father; has no legs and lives in a dustbin. Nell - Hamm's mother; has no legs and lives in a dustbin next to Nagg's.
Is it more “tragic” that the cast is all physically disabled or “funny” because three of the four characters have no lower extremities and reside in dustbins? It baffles me that someone can become famous and have an icon like status for writing “Tragic Comedies” such as “The Endgame.” I often wonder what people are thinking. We were taught in psychology to read one’s body language, but Samuel Beckett proved to the people in his world and now ours that we can never really tell what one is thinking. Take for instance the fact that Samuel Beckett was an avid chess player in his day and while I am only speculating now, but I always thought that chess was a “thinking game?” Tragic comedies such as “The Endgame” were written and performed to make the audience think. The comedy is placed in the play as a dramatic intention to get the audience involved.
The “period of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document