Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The emergence of Political parties in the 1790s

Better Essays
1043 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The emergence of Political parties in the 1790s
Political parties are organized for various reasons, such as: to support a particular political figure, to advance a particular policy or a general ideological stand, to aid politically certain groups or sections of society, or merely to combine for short-term political advantages. From the beginning of the United States, groups such as the Tories, Whigs, Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, have been active, supporting various ideas or plans. The Tories, who were pro-Britaish before the American Revolution, and the Whigs, those who were Pro-American before the American Revolution, were of the earliest groups organized to support a certain cause or idea. Next the Federalists and Anti-Federalists emerged, alternating supporting and obstructing the ratification of the Constitution. During Washington's presidency dominant political parties were unknown, but during his second term the emergence of the Hamilton Jefferson rivalry began to. Washington worked to maintain neutrality, but the coming of two dominant political parties appeared close on the horizon. The 1790s were a turbulent period both at home and abroad, and the conflicts that arose laid the foundation of the two-party system in the United States.

Domestically, the economic programs of Alexander Hamilton generated fervent opposition from Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican or "Jeffersonian". Through Jefferson and Hamilton's economic and political opposing views, the emergence of dominant political parties arose. Hamilton, a strong Federalist who was Washington's Secretary of Treasury, brought forth many proposals to solve the new nation's national debt problems. Subsequently, Thomas Jefferson strongly opposed Hamilton's resolutions and plans. First, Hamilton wanted the national debt to be funded at par, which would allow the infant national government to gain respectability and prove their validity and authority. Hamilton persuaded Jefferson to gather votes for his financial plan if "in return, Virginia would have the federal district on the Potomac" (Bailey 186). Next, Hamilton wanted to create a national bank. Jefferson, a strict constructionist, impetuously argued this to be unconstitutional. Through a loose interpretation of the Constitution, more specifically the "elastic clause", Washington signed a national bank to be chartered for only twenty years. When Hamilton placed an excise tax upon whiskey, the Whiskey Rebellion took place. The farmers, who were converting their grain into Whiskey because it was easier to transfer, decided to create a rebellion in protest to the Whiskey Rebellion. Despite eager opposition, Hamilton's programs were passed. From such arguments, the result was not only a split in the administration, but the advent of political parties.

Naturally, "Federalists" supported Hamilton and "Republicans" supported Jefferson. Under Adam's administration, the Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts as an assault on Republican power. The Alien Acts made it more difficult to become a citizen, provided for detention of aliens in time of war, and allowed the president to deport any alien. "Most European immigrants, lacking wealth, were scorned by the aristocratic Federalist Party. But they were welcomed as voters by the less prosperous and more democratic Jeffersonians" (Bailey 196). The Sedition Act outlawed criticism of the government of the president; "it was a direct slap at two priceless freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution by the Bill of Rights-freedom of speech and press" (Bailey 197). The provisions of these acts not only challenged the Constitution but caused Jefferson and Madison to pass the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions that proclaimed the right of states nullification thus being the first proposal allowing disobedience towards Congress if laws exceeded Constitutional authority. Controversial "Federalist" legislation, therefore, led to the creation of a strong opposition party, despite Washington's warnings of political parties in his Farewell Address.

In addition to domestic affairs, certain foreign affairs contributed to the rise of political parties in the United States. Federalists, many of whom were previous Loyalists, condemned the French Revolution, while Republicans praised its democratic ideals. The Federalists and Republicans expressed contradicting views on nearly every affair. When the British eagerly tried to cut off the French West Indies, they seized about three hundred American merchant ships and impressed many American soldiers. In an attempt to revive peace with Britain, John Jay, a Federalist, was sent to negotiate. The Republicans feared that Jay, being somewhat pro-British, would fail to draw a treaty favoring America. Jay's Treaty stated that the British agreed to evacuate their forts on the frontiers and pay their damage costs from their recent attacks on American ships. It forced the United States to pay the debts still owed to British merchants on pre-Revolutionary accounts. The American colonists, especially the Republicans, were disappointed, and felt like they were "cheated" in this treaty. Further, in the XYZ affairs, President Adams sent ambassadors to negotiate with Telleyrand in France in hope to avoid war. The French demanded bribes before the Americans could meet with Telleyrand and negotiate. This event was released in American newspapers and the three men who tried to push bribery over the Americans were known as X, Y, and Z. The American diplomats turned down the bribe and went back to America. "The Federalists were delighted at this unexpected turn of affairs, whereas all except the most rabid Jeffersonians hung their heads in shame over the misbehavior of their French friends" (Bailey 195).

The novel introduction of political parties in the United States provided more than two popular opposing political groups; they served a valid function. With two opposing bodies it allowed opposition to be equal. With the presence of political parties it helped to eliminate the chances of a dictatorship forming. Political parties helped to keep the government in the will of the people; members of each party must compete for offices, therefore to get an office the majority of the people must be pleased on the decisions. "The competition for power proved to be among the indispensable ingredients of a sound democracy" (Bailey 189). The presence of political parties helped to shape the new government into a stable democracy with the involvement of the United States people.

Furthermore, the United States' affairs and disputes helped to bring about important parties that proved to be crucial in the building of the new government's operations and authority. Because of Jefferson and Hamilton's contradicting views a crucial ingredient was emitted that allowed American to become a strong democracy that it is today. Domestic and foreign affairs therefore produced tensions that established the tradition of political parties in the United States.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two-party system was formed by the end of Jackson’s presidency. [1] Although both parties, Jacksonian Democrats and Whigs, grew out of the same roots of the Jeffersonian republicanism, each bore different political philosophy and policy. For example, the Whigs welcomed the involvement of government and favored protective tariffs. They believed in internal improvements, schools and black colonization with the federal finance. They also advocated the regulation of currency and credit based on the similar idea of the Bank of the United States. Furthermore, the party supported moral, intellectual, economic advance, and the state school systems as well as a soft approach to the Indian removal. The Whigs emphasized principles of system and disciplines…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America’s first two political parties began with Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. This established the three branches treasury, state, and war. Hamilton had the role of secretary of treasury which he was with the federalist while Jefferson had the role of relations with foreign countries and he was with Republicans. Jefferson believed that America would be more successful if it had agricultural traditions while on the other hand Hamilton beliefs were more economically planned through facilities. Hamilton’s ideas and the Federalists were having a stronger central government acting in interest of commerce and manufactured (like Britain).…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson vs Alexander Hamilton, one of the chief rivalries at the center of American politics through the first two decades, split the nation by ideology and purpose. Hamilton, a staunch Federalist, and Jefferson with his agrarian democracy, could not agree on much in regards to the structure and role of government. During the first term of the Washington administration, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were both serving on the Cabinet as the Treasurer and Secretary of State respectively. Their constant disagreements over fiscal policy, such as Hamilton's proposal for a central bank, led to Jefferson's resignation from the administration. President Washington would hold a grudge against Thomas Jefferson for the rest of his life after the latter formed an anti-administration party with James Madison. The factionalism caused by the Alexander Hamilton vs Thomas Jefferson rivalry would eventually lead to the formation of the country's first political parties. Hamilton's Federalists held the early advantage over Jefferson's Republicans, later known as the Democratic-Republicans.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was the sculptor who chiseled the rough edges of America’s economy away. He was the essential part in the plan to solve the massive war debt after the revolution. As a strong federalist, he had views that he and his party shared and were deemed fit for the refinement of America’s economy. Thomas Jefferson was his eternal rival in terms of views. Along with James Madison, Jefferson was the polar opposite to Hamilton. The two past presidents seemed to be rigid with their views concerning political strategies the United States was taking in its early decades. These men before their presidencies were rock solid anti-federalist. However, Jefferson and Madison…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were on opposing sides when Hamilton announced plans for a national bank. They both organized themselves into 2 political parties: Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, and the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. Alexander Hamilton stood for the interests of seaports, while Thomas Jefferson spoke for rural and southern interests. Primarily the debate between Jefferson and Hamilton was about concerns of power of the central government and power of states. Federalists were in favor of government power, while the Republicans favored states’ power.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were opposing forces during the 1790’s. Thomas Jefferson was one of the first democratic-republican politicians in American History. He protected the rights of individuals while many of Hamilton’s positions were centered around the federal government. Hamilton was a federalist so it was no secret that many of his stances supported a strong central government. Hamilton was more focused on order while Jefferson’s interests lied in the heart of freedom.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton sought to shape the fiscal policies of the administration, so that it would favor the wealthier groups, who would in return lend the government monetary and political support. He urged Congress to assume the entire national debt, justifying it as a proper national obligation since the debt was incurred in the war for independence. As the capstone of his financial system, Hamilton proposed the idea of a bank of the U.S; more specifically, he proposed a powerful private institution of which the government was the major stockholder.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton; a man that’s known mostly for being the main character of the musical of the same name, being on the ten dollar bill, and writing fifty-one of the eighty-five Federalist Papers. When one thinks of him, more often than not, one of these three things will come to mind, or some combination of the three. But, really, he did so much more than that in his surprisingly not-so-well known occupation; that being, being the first Secretary of the Treasury. In his time in office, he introduced a multitude of different ideas and plans, all of which formed many systems that still exist to this day. The Federal Reserve System, the two-party system… this, and so much more, was formed by Hamilton. At least, the basis of it for this country was; and yet… not many people know about it.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamilton sought a strong central government acting in the interests of commerce and industry. He brought to public life a love of efficiency, order and organization. In response to the call of the House of Representatives for a plan for the "adequate support of public credit," he laid down and supported principles not only of the public economy, but of effective government. Hamilton pointed out that America must have credit for industrial development, commercial activity and the operations of government. It must also have the complete faith and support of the people. There were many who wished to repudiate the national debt or pay only part of it. Hamilton, however insisted upon full payment and also upon a plan by which the federal government took over the unpaid debts of the states incurred during the Revolution.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."1 This view, expressed by John Adams, was not shared by all, namely Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. As the early American government began to form, so did the two major political parties. Alexander Hamilton was the founder of the Federalist Party, while Thomas Jefferson led the Anti-Federalists in response.2 Both men used their prominence in each party to their advantage to influence the public and their disputes created controversy and discordance between the parties and the American people. Hamilton and Jefferson had many disagreements throughout their careers and had radically different opinions on what their new country should be like.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because of this, parties naturally form. In the United States, the formation can be traced to before The Constitution and the dispute over strong versus weak government, and continued to develop through the early years of the new government. Once the Constitution was established debates arose on several fronts. Whether it was through financial planning, distribution of power, or potentially unlawful treaties, tensions between the ideals of the two groups were enflamed. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were often so polarized that coming to compromises could be difficult, much to the chagrin of others, including Washington. However, they cannot be completely credited with forming the two-party system. Other politicians contributed, and at times the division was just the natural product of the circumstance. Also, they are not entirely the reason the system has persevered over time. Instead, the nature of elections in the United States have caused the two-party system to be maintained. All this being said, whether Hamilton and Jefferson are entirely to blame, they also proved that dissension is not always bad. It allows for different ideas to be heard and compromises to be made. Through their disagreements they produced innovation that has shaped the nation. This party system, though it has shifted and swapped over the years, still stands. The effects of these men run so deep that…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans provided the U.S. with permanent political parties due to their interpretation of the Constitution, which would evolve and merge the beliefs of the two as time went on. When the political parties were created, people they might believed weaken the unity of the U.S., but they checked and balanced each other out to make sure there would be no tyrannical party ruler. As the Federalists interpreted the Constitution loosely, mainly using the elastic clause, they were able to create and pass laws that were not directly stated in the Constitution, which the Democratic-Republicans would then argue as invalid. During the period from 1800 to 1824, both the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans stayed true to their traditional principles; however, both parties evolved and compromised their ideals during the endless conflict of the strengthening of the governments powers and adaptation to the never-ending disagreements political parties, according to what was needed at the time.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Parties have been in the United States since 1796. A big question that has been asked many time is. Why did America form political parties? This is because a lot of the candidates have many different views as seen in document one which is a chart that shows the differences between Hamilton and Jefferson. When theses…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These political factions were predominantly notable within the Washington and Adams administrations. Washington’s administration consisted of Thomas Jefferson as Secretary of State, and Alexander Hamilton, who ran the treasury. Jefferson advocated for a Democratic Republican, in contrast, Hamilton advocated for a Federalist approach to government. Several times throughout Washington’s presidency, the contrasting political factions between Jefferson and Hamilton caused political divide and unrest. The farmworkers of the constitution envisioned a one party system. However, angla papilles, those who advocated for commercial interests, disagreed with francophiles, frontiersmen. Jay’s Treaty sparked an intense debate in 1795. Southerners, westerners, agrarians, and supporters of the French, opposed the treaty. The treaty was signed with Great Britain, and averted war over the British seizure of American ships. Washington agreed with Hamilton about this topic. Hamiltonian supporters were satisfied because it maintained the United States’s neutrality in foreign affairs. However, Jeffersonians were displeased due to the fact that the treaty did not mention compensation for the slaves who fled to the British side during The Revolution. Pinckney’s Treaty included Spain agreeing to a boundary with the United States, and opening shipping to the United States as well. This satisfied Jeffersonians. However, administration supporters demanded acquiescence of Jay’s Treaty first. These situations emphasize a great political divide, as well as unrest in the nation at this time. As a result, Washington became increasingly untrusting of political factions. Hamilton wanted to continue trade and relations with Britain and supported Washington when he signed the Proclamation of neutrality. In response, Jeffersonians organized democratic societies,…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays