1.)The Rationale that the authors gave for studying violent rap music videos was, because they wanted to observe the effects that "violent rap music videos" had on them. The experimental groups were exposed to "violent rap music videos", and or "non-violent rap music videos" whereas the control group was exposed to "no music videos". The results were as follows; A.) The experimental group conveyed a "greater acceptance of the use of violence". B.) The experimental group expressed a greater chance that they would "engage in violence.". C.) The experimental group showed a higher approval of the "use of violence toward the woman.". The experimental group was also more materialistic compared to the control group, they were less confident in achieving educational goals. 2.)The researchers chose to look at the effects of violent rap music videos on the perception of study to see if the genre of "violent rap" actually extended further then just rage, and violence. In fact, it was proven on the chart that the boys who watch the "violent rap videos" more frequently chose to be more materialistic, and would rather not go to school, as they perceived (according to the information given) that they would not succeed. 3.)The main hypothesis was to "assess the effects of exposure to violent rap videos on attitudes toward the use of violence.".
The secondary hypothesis was "verbal and visual imagery in rap music seems to question the value and utility of mainstream ideals and institution." 4.)The independent variable for the "non violent music videos" was the types of songs, or artists that they chose (as some rap artists are actually educational e.g. Andre 3000, Common, etc.) .
The dependant variable could have been completely different results.
The independent variable for the "violent music videos" were the kids chosen to be in that group. (They could have been more violent, younger(thus more impressionable to...