Preview

Echr

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Echr
The Right to Freedom of Expression and Religion
This chapter includes two rights: a) the freedom of opinion and expression and b) the freedom of conscience and religion. Although these are two distinctive rights, they are in the same group as they both entail essential conditions for individual personal development. These rights are juxtaposed because freedom of expression is a quintessential aspect of the freedom to hold, practice and share one’s religious beliefs. It is important to note, however, that the freedom of expression is subject to more restrictions than the freedom of religion. A. The right to freedom of opinion and expression
The freedom of expression is a right without which other rights are difficult to acquire and defend. The right to freedom of expression is rooted in the 17th century struggle of European legislators for freedom of speech. The world has seen a continuing struggle for the freedom of expression, including the freedom of speech and freedom of the press, often going hand in hand with the endeavour to limit the power of governments. The freedom of expression can be considered an essential aspect of the individual’s defence against government, just as the suppression of the freedom of expression is essential to tyranny. Human rights defenders also rely heavily on this right to challenge government indifference to or infliction of human rights abuses. As freedom of expression is a foundation for religious and political activities, it is often exercised in concert with the right to freedom of thought and assembly.
Under present international Conventions, state obligations in relation to freedom of expression are absolute and immediate. At the same time, as with other forms of liberty, completely unrestricted freedom of expression may lead to the infringement on the rights of others. The freedom of expression has been hedged in by a number of limitations and restrictions, often more extensively than other rights. Historically, most

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, Kenyon examines the belief that the public media requires free speech. The author claims that free speech is not all about what is trying to be conveyed but the concept of free speech is also about content that are debatable in order to generate the diversity of ideas amongst the people.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In an idealistic world we would use our negative liberty and given right, to speak freely without consequence; yet, the right to speak freely should be imposed on by positive liberties and considered in terms of the potential to elicit harm or offence to others in society. Restricting individuals on their speech based on their level of social influence is practicable, as the more influence they have, the greater the potential for harm and offence to others. There is a need to not just preserve society, but also to protect those not yet matured; at the same time, individuals, of any level of influence, have the right to express their own opinion. Expression of opinion is important in the growth of both individuals and society; as in effect,…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalism Key Terms

    • 3635 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Freedom of Expression- The political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them.…

    • 3635 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What does freedom of expression really mean? Why is it important to our democratic society? In the landmark case of R. v. Keegstra (1990), the issues of freedom of expression and hate speech is brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada. The case also deals with issues of whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) and section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The courts view that the objectives of having freedom of speech are correlated with democracy in the sense that for members of society to have their voices heard, they must be free to speak on matters that provide value back to society. This case has served as precedence for other freedom of expression cases. R. v. Keegstra can be looked at through many of the legal principles, but for the purposes of this essay, I will focus on the Offense Principle. This principle, brought forward by Joel Feinberg, is a tangent of John Mill’s Harm Principle, which deals with non-physical harm, such as hate speech. This is evident when looking at R. v. Keegstra, as the Offense Principle is the best principle to articulate why the dissenting judges ruled the way they did. I believe that the lead dissenting judge, Beverly McLachlin, ruled accurately in her judgement and I intend to support this ruling throughout this essay. As well, I will provide a summery of R. V. Keegstra, look at Philosophical principles as…

    • 2805 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The First Amendment to the constitution guaranties freedom of expression. The framers of the Constitution believed this freedom was essential to a strong democracy. The intent and value that the founders saw as one important principal is the freedom of expression though speech because it allowed people the freedom to communicate freely in different ways. This essay will explain how freedom of expression has influenced the court system, media, and assembly.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charter Of Rights Essay

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though, in the Charter of Rights, it is stated that the freedom of speech and expression can be limited or denied, depending if certain conditions are met, of which on is when the reputation or right of others is being tainted,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Speech Be Limited

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment is not just a right, which can be declared or abolished. According to the “Liberty Theory”, proposed by some legal scholars, freedom of speech is an essential part of the liberty of every person, who pursues an individual self-determination and…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 2318 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Free speech as an integral aspect of each individual’s right to self-development and fulfilment. Restrictions on expression will inhibit the growth of personality (by formulating their own beliefs and political attitudes through public discussions). This argument asserts individual right to free speech even if it is inimical to welfare and development of society. It treats speech as a special value apart from other liberties.…

    • 2318 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order for the United States to form a more stable and perfect union, to establish justice, and to make a stronger government for the people and by the people a constitution is needed. This Constitution will make the courts better for all states, to have good living conditions, promote general welfare, and for us to have freedom along with all the next generations. All three branches of government will be directly responsible and obligated to carry out and serve the Will of the People (Bradburn 4-5).…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Vouchers

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Freedom of speech is defined as the right to voice one’s opinion publicly without fear or censorship. In nations with authoritarian forms of government, blatant government censorship is enforced. The right to free speech is what separates democracy from authoritarian governments. Even if all people don’t agree with certain statements a person may make, they along with all people have the right to make such statements. The right to voice one’s opinion publicly without fear is very important to the concept of…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the United States we have many freedoms that we as citizens possess. Freedom of speech is one of the freedoms we enjoy. But what is the meaning of the word “freedom”, and how free is our speech? The word free, according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary means: having the legal and political rights of a citizen. With this in mind, it does not mean that we have the right to do and say as we please. The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (The Constitution of The United States). The Citizens of the United States misinterpret the phase “Freedom of Speech” to suit their own needs and wants. In this essay we will discuss how our interpretation of our freedom is only a myth brought on by our selfish ways and thoughts and interpreted according to what we feel it means in the situations that fit best. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Supreme Courts to only protect citizens in certain applications and situations and, not protect some companies and corporations nor does it offer to protect citizens of the United States from speaking against the government. Governmental agencies have twisted the first amendment to fit what the individuals of that particular agencies likes or dislikes, and their view of certain speakers.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the right to equality is important to Canadian citizenship. Every person deserves equal respect in society. One most not be discriminated based on colour of skin, gender, religion or physical disability. All people should be treated fairly without discrimination. In Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms it states that “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex,…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Freedom of Speech?

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Living in America means that we as citizens of the country have many rights according to the laws stated in the United States Constitution, which stands for our principles and make up the rights that American 's deserve. One major freedom we have is stated in The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This amendment shows that our government should not be allowed to put limitations on the people 's right to express themselves through free speech and religion. We as citizens have the right to voice our opinions as long as we do not cause harm while doing so. This is a reason why many people from around the world choose to come to America, for their right to freedom. The first amendment should apply to everyone who lives in the United States, but in some cases it does not.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This reveals the unfortunate fact that even though almost everyone claims to support freedom of speech, their definition of freedom of speech is quite restricted. This is of course something that not only Muslims do, but almost everyone. In this text I will define the framework to achieve what I like to call absolute freedom of speech. Even it will have a limited restriction, but only because of the current technological level of our society. I believe with sufficient technology absolute freedom of speech will be possible indeed. As far as I concern, there is not a single nation that does not guarantee “freedom of speech” in their constitution. It is included in pretty much any EU country, in the US, Malaysia, in China and even in North Korea. This shows that the word itself is pretty meaningless, since the custom is to claim to have freedom of speech and still have a widespread censorship system in place. This applies to Western nations too, not only to countries like North Korea where the situation is abhorrent.…

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays