Preview

Changes Brought by the Obama Administration

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Changes Brought by the Obama Administration
Cody Saben
0963439
POLS 321 – AF

“Easier Said Than Done”

Researching foreign policy comparisons between George W. Bush and Barack Obama turns out to be quite the depressing venture for someone who fell in love with our current president during his first race for president. From Iraq to Afghanistan to nuclear proliferation, Obama’s 2008 campaign took every opportunity to distance his policies with those of Bush due to public displeasure and ideological differences. After seeing Obama’s first term and the various foreign policy issues he has faced, there are ways Obama has kept his promise and distance from the Bush administration, but he has also continued several key components of the “Bush Doctrine,” being unable to ‘walk his talk.’ I argue that in the case of drone usage as a form of imminent threat defense, Obama is using legal defense started by the Bush administration and continuing to arm Unmanned Aerial Vehicle’s (UAV’s) in order to wage war on terrorism. However, the current president has moved away from Bush’s reliance on unilateralism to solve world conflict, especially in Libya. I will first introduce the legality of the use of drones and how Obama has built off Bush-era arguments, and then move to Libya and highlight the current administrations push for multilateralism in a post-Bush world. In order to provide a short roadmap of the essay to follow, I’ll provide a short summary of the necessary points. First, I will discuss Obama’s continuation of Bush’s use of drones in war. The continuation is based on the legal principle Bush created which enabled this use, a principle Obama has stood behind. Second, I will detail a divergence Obama’s administration took from Bush’s policies in the form of multilateralist approaches to foreign conflict. The definition I have used for multilateralism is a campaign or intervention is a campaign or intervention with shared responsibility amongst several different parties or nations. In the case of Bush, his



Cited: 1. Byers, Dylan. "Obama 's Drones, Eisenhower 's Poison." Politico. N.p., 29 Apr. 2013. Web. 2. Jackson, David. "Bush Lawyer Defends Obama on Drones." USA Today. Gannett, 8 Mar. 2013. Web. 07 May 2013. 3. "Covert War on Terror - the Datasets." The Bureau of Investigative Journalism RSS. N.p., 10 Aug. 2011. Web. 07 May 2013. 4. "Covert War on Terror - the Datasets." The Bureau of Investigative Journalism RSS. N.p., 3 Jan. 2013. Web. 07 May 2013. 5. Krauthammer, Charles. "In Defense of Obama 's Drone War." Washington Post. N.p., 14 Feb. 2013. Web. 07 May 2013. 6. Patrick, Stewart M. "Council on Foreign Relations." Council on Foreign Relations. N.p., 29 Mar. 2011. Web. 07 May 2013. 7. Lyman, John. "President Obama’s Multilateralism: Its Effectiveness and Weaknesses." International Policy Digest. N.p., 27 Mar. 2011. Web. 07 May 2013. 8. Cortright, David. "A Major Win for Obama 's Libya Policy." CNN. Cable News Network, 22 Aug. 2011. Web. 07 May 2013. 10. AP Staff. "Al-Awlaki Killed in Yemen." Washington Post. N.p., 30 Sept. 2011. Web. 6 May 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    6.) Steinhauser, Paul. "A day after Libya attack, Obama described it as 'acts of terror '." CNN 17 Oct. 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. .…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jenkins, G. (2006). From Kennedy 's cold war to the war on terror. History Today, 56(6), 39-41.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Looming Tower

    • 4335 Words
    • 18 Pages

    References: Bergen. P., (2010). The Longest War: The Enduring Conflict Between America and Al-Qaeda. New York: Simon and Schuster…

    • 4335 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    If there is one word that suits the fact that a president, who won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, adheres the usage of drones to kill US citizens affiliated with Al-Qaeda, it would be nothing less than ironic. In the Maclean’s article “When Dick and Barack agree, watch out,” Paul Wells discusses an ongoing conflict within US politics, specifically their drone policies. The article starts us off by introducing the readers with comments made by Dick Cheney on CBS. Mr. Cheney felt Obama “wanted to reduce U.S influence in the world, he wanted to take us down a peg” (Wells 2). After announcing a few more disagreements with Obama’s policies, Cheney surprised the audience by actually agreeing with one single policy. Remote-controlled drones. “I think it’s a good program. I don’t disagree with the basic policy that the Obama administration is pursuing” (Wells 2). Dick Cheney agreeing with Obama, has left the public feeling uneasy about Obama as “Cheney single-handedly steered America from being a nation among nations (albeit superior), operating (roughly) in accordance with the rule of law, and toward its present manifestation as the new Rome, a decadent imperial power bent on global domination whatever the cost”(Ritters).Drones in the hands of the United States have only caused more bad than good, doing harm not only to financial assets and human lives, but exposing the true militaristic nature of their country.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jones, D. Bruce, Forman, Shepard, Gowan, Richard, 2011, “Cooperating for Peace and Security, Evolving Institutions and Arrangements in a Context of Changing US Security Policy”, European Journal of International Law Vol. 22 no. 3, http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/3/912.extract…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lieber, Robert. "Examining America 's Role in Global Affairs." VOA. Voice of America, 31 Oct. 2009. Web. 14 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    _____, 2005b. "The Hidden Hand of the C.I.A. and the 9/11 Propaganda of Popular Mechanics," American Free Press, March 19 (http://www.rense.com/general63/brutalpurgeofPMstaff.htm).…

    • 4084 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fahrenheit 451

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Matusek, Matt. “Purpose of Iraq war murky to Americans.” 17 September 2004. The Online Rocket. 1 April 2008.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Papp, Daniel S., Loch K. Johnson, and John E. Endicott. American Foreign Policy: History, Politics, and Policy. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005. Print.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Byman, Dan. "Fighting the War on Terrorism: A Better Approach." Www.tobinproject.org. N.p., 2006. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Peterson, Paul. 1994. The President, the Congress, and the Making of Foreign Policy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.…

    • 3315 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    McDermott, Rose. Journal of Cold War Studies. Fall2002, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p29-59. 31p. DOI:…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays