Bingo Bango Whisky Tango
Imagine what 3,297,500 teachers could do. They could do so much good for so many little kids, future lawyers, doctors, and politicians. A great teacher may even inspire of those children to be the next president of the United States. That giant number of 3 million plus teachers is what we could hire if the government wasn’t spending 131.9 billion dollars being spent on welfare that we could statistically be saving if we were drug testing welfare recipients. That number also doesn’t include people getting food stamps, or the people who qualify for unemployment. Or, we spent that money on the future we could send over 6 million students through public colleges to improve our economy, and stimulate innovation. All welfare recipients should have to undergo drug testing before receiving any sort of help financial from the government.
There is one big issue that brings up a lot of controversy on this topic and it is that the drug testing of welfare recipients is a violation of privacy and that it is unconstitutional. People are saying that the government shouldn’t be that intrusive on their lives, and that it is none of the governments business. People say that it is a violation of the fourth amendment that states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (US History) Which so this is saying is “which protects citizens against unreasonable government search and seizure, and requires a warrant for all searches that aren’t supported by probable cause.” People on the other side of this issue say, “If I have to pass a drug test to earn money at my job, why shouldn’t they have to pass one to receive taxpayer dollars from the government? That can just be simply rebutted by pointing out that some people work for a corporation, which is a privately owned company, and not subject to Fourth Amendment limitations. The government, however, is not a corporation, and does have to abide by the Fourth Amendment. But to me in this case the government could be considered a corporation in this sense because a corporation’s job is to make a profit. But the government is giving people money and their job is to turn themselves around and get a job. Which would be benefiting the government in the sense that they would have to pay taxes, plus that would stimulation the economy. One more person at work means that the government would be receiving more tax dollars.
There are also a lot of people who think that a drug testing welfare recipient promotes a stereotype when it doesn’t. Not many people just say that person is poor so they do drugs. I think the point of welfare is to give people money to live on. People should get the things they need for them and their families to survive, and not to spend money on things that aren’t necessities like drugs, and alcohol. But the fact is that if people get drug tested before working its not going to hurt someone who is basically being given free money. Members of our military are regularly drug tested. Drug testing does not promote a stereotype, it just help the government control what needs to happen to taxpayer dollars.
Drug testing will reveal recipients who are wasting taxpayers’ money on drugs. In Utah they are making drug testing mandatory. They believe that 5 to 10 percent of the people who are receiving welfare will fail the test. ( Mckitrick ) They have 21,800 people on welfare. (Statemaster) If only lets say 5 percent of those people fail that would be total of 1090 people who failed the test. The average amount of money a family receives a month is about $503 dollars. (Fredman) That would save $548,270 a month and $6,579,240 a year just alone in the state of Utah, and that is...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document