Some people are discussing the driving age for teenagers. How it should be raised or lowered. I am going to explore both sides and in the end choose one for my self. The different sides include; Keep the age the same, lowering it, and raising it, of just making it to where you can get your permit earlier but still drive at 16. The age for driving could change over the next couple of years, so there will be positive and negative consequences.
If we keep the age at 16 and not change it at all it will not have that many effects on people. I mean, people will still be in school and be able to take test and learn at school. More people will pay for insurance because they will have jobs. Why should we even change the age? It seems like it has been working for years why change something good. But it isn't exactly good is it. Many teens are not mature or capable enough to drive yet. And because of that the crash rate for teens is very high. Most of car accidents are involving teens, and two out of five teens killed in an accident are involved with cars crashes. One other thing is that many of these kids that are driving do not have jobs. There for the can not pay for their car and insurance by themselves.
Like I said before some people feel that the state should lower the age. Why the heck are the people saying that? 16 is low enough, anything lower is just suicide. Now if anything good about it would be this. Parent wouldn't have to drive there kids to work of friends houses. But really when you have a kid you know you are going to have to do that, its part of being a parent. Think about the parents would feel if their kids were driving earlier. They would be continently worrying about them. Kids would most likely start to drink and party, because they would be alone with friends a lot more. So many kids would also be drinking and driving. So even more kids would be dieing just from one law being changed. So lowering the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document