Drinking Age

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 113
  • Published : December 11, 2012
Open Document
Text Preview
Drinking Age Should Be Lower To18

Drinking Age Should Be Lower To18
As we know, the national drinking age is 21, but more and more people doubt if this age is rational and beneficial. When young people turn to 18, they have the right to vote. Also, they can serve in the military. Moreover, they can make a decision for their future, that is they can decide if they want to drop out from school. But is drink alcohol an act that have more responsibility than vote a president. On Dec 5,1993, the stats repealed the alcohol prohibition by the 21st Amendment and allowed each state to set its own alcohol consumption laws. At that time, most states set the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) of 21 for men and 18 for women, except Illinois and Oklahoma. On July 1, 1971 passage of the 26th Amendment, which lowered the legal voting age from 21 to 18 years of age. Then, 30 U.S. states lowered their MLDA to 18, 19, or 20; by 1982, only 14 states still had an MLDA of 21. Scientists began studying the effects of the lowered MLDA. The scientists pay more attention on the incidence of motor vehicle accidents, the leading cause of death among teenagers. Several studies in the 1970s found that motor vehicle crashes increased significantly among teens when the MLDA was lowered. With evidence that a lower drinking age resulted could cause more traffic injuries among youth, citizen advocacy groups pressured states to restore the MLDA to 21. Then 16 states increased their MLDA between September 1976 and January 1983. In 1984, the National Minimum Drinking Age Act required all states to raise Yangli2

their minimum purchase and public possession of alcohol age to 21, and the U.S. Department of Transportation has determined that all states are in compliance with this act. Among alcohol control policies, the MLDA has been the most studied: since the 1970s, at least 70 studies have examined the effects of either increasing or decreasing the MLDA. While nowadays, the national law does not require prohibition of persons under 21 (also called youth or minors) from drinking or purchase alcoholic beverages (Hanson). Drinking age should be lower to 18 or 19, because when people turn to 18, they are recognized as an adult, they have the voting right, they can go to military, they can even get a plan-drive license. Young people are gave many rights when they are 18, except drink a cup of beer. Young people usually have the more exploring spirit, they are curious about the thing they never tried before. The policy of alcohol forbidden for the 18 adults is a way to cover a mystery coat for even a cup of light beer. Obviously, the young adults curious about the feeling of drinking alcohol. As a matter of fact, drinking age is quite a sensitive issue and very discursive at the same time. On the one hand, everything banned is doomed to be desired and reached by all means. On the other hand, young people do need regulations, at least in terms of their psychological and physiological immaturity. The danger of giving too much freedom is evident. However, freedom requires much responsibility and this behavioral pattern might and should be learned. The minimum legal drinking age is a matter of long-lasting debates and doubts. However, there are exact reasons for changing the Yangli3

appropriate law towards the lowering the drinking age. Indeed, there are always contrary facts but, facing the truth, the society should choose the option, which requires the least misery consequences parallel to the most effective ones. Obviously, young people will definitely drink alcohol, whether it will be prohibited or not. Lowering the drinking age and providing reasonable control might decrease the tension and the tendency to antilogous actions. In the area of domestic policy, the president uses the State of the Union address, the federal budget, the power to make executive appointments, the bully pulpit,...
tracking img