Dracula: A better read, or a better movie?
Since the beginning of the moving picture, directors have been recreating books into movie. More often than not, the directors will change the original plot line of the book. In Bram Stoker’s Dracula the director changes the plot in a few different instances but for the most part, the director keeps the same plotline. Some similarities between the book and the movie are: the genre and setting, loss of personal power, and the gothic features. Francis Ford Coppola, director of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, changed a few minor parts of the plot from the book. Even though the movie and book differ slightly, they both are great works.
One of the most obvious similarities between Dracula the book and Bram Stoker’s Dracula the movie, is the setting and genre. Both the book and the movie take place in Transylvania sometime during the late 1700s. During the 1700s, most writings were considered to be written with the gothic style of writing. The gothic style of writing Another similarity that Dracula and Bram Stoker’s Dracula share is the genre they fall into. They both fall into the horror genre, but they use different techniques to achieve the spooky atmosphere. In the book, Bram Stoker does a tremendous job of using certain words help paint a mental picture of a given scene. “And then there was silence, deep, awful silence, which chilled me. With a beating heart, I tried the door, but I was locked in my prison, and could do nothing. I sat down and simply cried”(Stoker). Stoker also instills a sense of hopelessness into the readers mind when Harker is held prisoner in Dracula’s castle. “I start at my own shadow, and am full of all sorts of horrible imaginings. God knows that there is ground for my terrible fear in this accursed place!” (Stoker). These quotes are examples of how Stoker creates the setting. Even Coppola does a wonderful job of creating a dark, ominous setting....