Preview

Dr Zhivago Movie

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dr Zhivago Movie
Dr. Zhivago Movie
The 1965 movie, Dr. Zhivago, takes a slight diversion from the novel by Boris Pasternak. My initial reading of Pasternak’s Nobel Prize winning novel told me a story of war, identity, and morality. It took individuals under normal circumstances and threw them into the tribulations of war and tragedy. This is emphasized by Yuri’s relationship with Lara. Though there was a strong sub-plot of love and romance, the strongest theme, to me, was that of the individual struggles during the Russian revolution, Civil War, and both World Wars. In the movie however, these two plots seemed reversed. Indeed, there were only background scenes and references of the war. It was primarily a romance between two souls separated by political conflict. To some, this is a subtle difference. But to me, upon reflection of Soviet history, the movie obscured the impact of the war and instead emphasized a love affair.
Beyond the plot differences, there were a handful of variations among the characters. One particularly important one, and a potential (but wasted) improvement from the book, was that of Pasha Antipov (Strelnikov). In the novel, he was largely out of sight and spoken of only through reference. True, there were many scenes in which he was the focus, but his character was more balanced between lover and revolutionary. In the movie, he was portrayed as an aggressive military activist first and foremost. His character serves to enhance the drama behind the war and the destruction it has brought to the people. This is easily seen in his conversation with Yuri, “Your feelings, insights, affections. It’s suddenly trivial now. You don’t agree? You’re wrong. The personal life is dead in Russia. History has killed it.”1 While this is an opportunity for the movie to emphasize the war, the director, David Lean, ignores it. Instead he has Yuri respond with a statement showing Yuri’s humanity, “I hate everything you say, but not enough to kill you for it.”2Admittedly, in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Christmas Carol Themes

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many differences between the movie and play. Some of which are subtle, but there. However, not all will be mentioned. One of the differences is that in the movie, Past is a female and in the play, Past is a male. Another difference…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first noticeable major difference is how the story is told. In the novel, Jon Krakauer writes from his own point of view, providing his own input and opinions on McCandless, while the film is told in his sister’s point of view; she is scarcely mentioned in the novel, aside from the fact that Chris was very fond of her. The shift in narrators in a way limits the amount of information that can be delivered to the audience. Though the narration by Chris’s sister adds a more…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For several years, World War II had been raging in Europe. In 1945, German soldiers surrounded Russia and tried to choke off the train of supplies entering the country. Leningrad, Russia remained under constant bombing by German aircraft. Leningrad was a key location for Russia’s war efforts due to its manufacturing facilities and needed to stay functional. Lev Beniov was on the roof of his apartment building watching the anti-aircraft balloons above the city. It was on this night that a dead German paratrooper landed in front of Lev’s building. As the news reached all the boys and girls on the roof, they rushed down to examine and loot the dead soldier. Within minutes, Russian soldiers appeared. Lev’s friends deserted him and he was arrested and thrown into the Crosses. After spending the night, Colonel Grechko gave Lev a chance to redeem himself for his wrongs and save his life. Through…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the movie and the book share a basic concept of showing an understanding of a story being told. The book does a more in depth explanation and a better job of narrating the story. John Knowles novel, A Separate Peace, is a story about a destructive and corrupt relationship between Finny and Gene who both attend Devon School around World War ll where most boys went off to fight in the army not realizing there was already a war created within themselves, hence the title, A Separate Peace. The book does a much more effective job of telling the story compared to the movie. In the novel, the story is being told from Gene's perspective whereas in the movie, it is being told from a third persons point of view. Also, Cliff…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take the ending for example, in the movie she had a fight scene with the main bad character in the movie. In the book she didn’t, she ended up having to fight her boyfriend, but not the bad character. In the movie she forced the woman to shut off the bad simulation people were in. In the book she did it herself; this changed the ending in many ways.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book and the film have more juxtapositions. For instance, they both show various types of a solider. Examples would be them showing the solider who doesn’t really want to be there (Kiowa and Ace) but came there other purposes, and a soldier who dissociates himself by creating jokes (Azar and Ace).Another similarity within The Things They Carried and ‘Full Metal Jacket’ would be the portrayal of the war. The way in which is shown is similar. It is as though they want the viewers and readers to get more emotionally to the war. They present background information and insight into the characters’ lives, thoughts and feelings. So by giving more information, the viewers and readers are able to connect more and easily.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first clear point of interpretation is the setting of the play. Polanski chose to remain true to the play’s original setting, in 11th century Scotland. The costumes, behavior of the characters, and sets depict the time period accurately, but in doing so, can prove distracting for a modern audience from the story itself. Goold chose to shift the story into the 20th century, and so the sets and costumes were familiar enough to the audience to fade into the background, and allow them to focus on the story. While at very different points in history, both films were set in the past, which allows a modern audience to have a similar experience to that of theatre-goers in Shakespeare’s day, of an interesting historical drama.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the contrary, in the movie everyone arrives by a ski lift to a cold, snowy mountain. Many of the indictments are changed between the two works. In the book, General Macarthur put his wife’s new lover in the frontline of battle, but in the book General Mandrake sends 5 men to their death. Miss Emily Brent scolds a woman into suicide in the book, while in the movie Miss Burgan kills her husband. Vera Claythorne let’s a young child drown in the book, and in the movie Ann Clide said to be responsible for the death of her sister’s fiance. Philip Lombard from the book killed a whole tribe by depriving them of provisions, while in the movie he is said to of killed the mother of his unborn child.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why I think the moviemaker chose those difference between the book and the movie was because in the book there was a narrator to tell you specific things. The narrator is there to tell some background information and make sure you get a better grasp of what’s taking place. So I feel as if in the movie they wanted you to pay closer attention to what was happening. And you have to have some differences between the two. While in the movie you can see more action and can sometimes explain things better by acting out, rather than being written out.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With regards to the basic turns of the plot, the film is pretty faithful to the novel. However, when it comes to the complexities of the characters, the film sells the novel short. The film presents things in a very black and white manner, while the novel is all about the various shades of gray which exist in the relationships between the characters.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War 2 many lives were changed through destruction, and pain. Those who survived were strong, but that did not make them winners. Surviving requires more than simply being alive. The sacrifices, and offenses placed upon those who survived took something away from them, and although they survived, winning the game of life for now they must live with haunting memories for the rest of their life. In Spiegelman’s Maus, those who survived, such as Vladek were not necessarily because he lost his family, possessions, and some sanity. In war nobody is a complete winner, and there are only losers. Vladek, a survivor is constantly haunted by events in his past life. Survivors can be subjected to all types of mental stress, such as guilt, flashbacks and depression. It is not easy to survive a war, and often what determines who survives is random. Vladek was fortunate enough to survive, and have an audience for whom to tell his story.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another big difference is that in the book the character is dying throughout the whole story and in the movie the character is working and is well and active. Another difference is that in the book most of the story takes place inside somewhere and in the movie most of the story takes place outside. Some similarities are that the characters are mostly the same and also the ending to both the book and the movie are the same.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My Lifr

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are different types of characters. Some are protagonists, and some are antagonists. Two antagonists, General Zaroff from "The Most Dangerous Game" and the king from, "The Lady or the Tiger?", can both be compared.These two characters are similar yet different in their nature, or personality, actions, and attitudes. These characters are both similar and different at the same time.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were a few changes that were made to make a smooth transition from stage to film, but there were many things that stayed the same. The plot of both versions was basically the same. The play and film centers on Father Flynn, Sister James, and Sister Aloysius. Sister Aloysius is convinced that Father Flynn has acted inappropriately around the male students at the school, and Sister James is the naïve young teacher that wants to see the best in everyone and tries her hardest to believe that the allegations are not true. The plot of both stories shows how Sister Aloysius tries to find out whether or not Father Flynn has been inappropriate with one boy in particular, Donald Muller, who also happens to be the only black student at the school.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Vs Evil

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In both stories the authors focus on the main characters to interpret the theme of good vs. evil. Both of the main characters are seen in a positive light and come from strong family backgrounds. Although these two characters may share similarities, they also have their differences. The major difference is how they carry themselves once evil is presented. Although the two stories share similarities in what it means to be good, the differences between how evil is presented is…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays