Preview

dr. pepper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
dr. pepper
Introduction to Problem
Dr. Pepper Snapple, Inc. is a leading producer of flavored beverages in North America and Caribbean. The success of the company is characterized by more than 50 different brands that are synonymous with the refreshment, fun and flavor. Some of these brands include: Dr. Pepper, 7UP, Sunkist; A&W. Some of the leading brands are number one in the market. The issue Dr. Pepper faces is related to whether or not the company should enter into the energy beverage market. In 2007, Dr. Pepper Snapple, Inc. was the only major domestic carbonated soft drink company (CSD), which did not introduce a line of energy drinks. Dr. Pepper Snapple, Inc. needs to determine the most effective and efficient way to enter the market.

Alternatives
The alternatives Dr. Pepper Snapple, Inc. faces are whether or not to enter into the energy drink market. It seems that launching a new product with the energy beverage market would be a good idea for Dr. Pepper Snapple because their strengths are strategically aligned with what makes a competitor successful within this market. The major challenges within the energy beverage market are identifying the target market, distribution, and advertising. If these challenges are approached correctly they can lead to a competitive advantage within the industry. This could be true in the following ways for Dr. Pepper Snapple, Inc.:
• Customer Relationships – Dr. Pepper Snapple, Inc. has strong relationships with their long-standing customers who can provide them with a likely advantage to gain shelf space within all different types of channels including convenience stores, retailers, and restaurants. This is an advantage to the company since the energy beverage market is dominant within the convenience stores and supermarkets channels.
• Advertising - Since the company is stable and well know within the beverage industry, the option to offer promotional items to market their product will be possible.
• Diverse Portfolio and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Study Snapple

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Snapple’s brand is a customer-based brand. Snapple is the first company to produce a complete line of all-natural beverages and they were “made from the best stuff on earth.” In 1980, Snapple created the non-carbonated ready-to-drink beverages with fruit juices and iced teas.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Dr Pepper Snapple Group became a publicly-traded and stand-alone company on the New York Stock Exchange on May 7, 2008. This was the result of Cadbury, plc spin off in which Americas Beverages group of business entities was held by Cadbury Schweppes. DPS integrated business model enables them to market more than 50 brands of premium beverages consisting of teas and juices; waters and mixers, and carbonated soft drinks as they manage the entire value chain from innovation to the shelves of stores (Drpeppersnapplegroup.com, 2014).…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snapples drinks are divided up into the following: Diet, Regular, Tea, Juice drink, and Additional flavors. Snapple’s equity comes from it’s “quirky, everyman vibe” and it’s “differentiation and new taste experiences”. The drink is viewed as somewhat of a luxury good, including natural ingredients, and claiming it’s “the best stuff on earth”. Not being associated with big corporations is good for Snapple’s brand and after its sale to Cadbury, Snapple proved to have brand equity again. Snapple is a fresher and healthier choice as compared to sodas and energy drinks. The product variety is large as each category of Snapple has numerous flavors and sweetness…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Icore Strategy Report

    • 4994 Words
    • 20 Pages

    At the Mountain View Beverage Company, we strive to be an industry leader in the soft-drink market, including fruit drinks, soda pop, ready-to-drink teas, and organic high-energy drinks. Our corporate image of being a friendly and sensible player in American business is made possible by our strong marketing program and our own bottling plants and distribution fleet. We are always attuned to the needs of local eateries, cafés, and coffee shops, as this is where we developed such a loyal customer base. As our customer base continues to grow and support us, we will be able to move our products into grocery and convenience stores. We will continue to expand our business so that our stockholders can remain pleased with our product quality and the company’s managerial vision, marketing plans, and operating efficiency. We will continue to supply our customers with beverages that are a healthy, vibrant source of drinking pleasure because at the Mountain View Beverage Company, we want to be “On Your Side” in today’s complex world.…

    • 4994 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They operate with 21 manufacturing facilities, 115 distribution centers employing around 19,000 people across North America but continue to utilize a larger work force with hundreds of third party bottling companies (Dr Pepper Snapple Group). Headquartered in Plano, Texas their President and CEO Larry Young made $9,616,891 in 2014, $5,999,932 in equity, $3,206,582 in cash and a remaining $410,395 in an unspecified “other” category of earnings. In 2014 (“Larry Young”) said that the Dr Pepper Snapple Group owes much of its past success to their many mergers working to make the company bigger and stronger than ever, but some failures have been in their advertisements. When they launched their Dr Pepper 10 campaign their slogan was “not for women” because of the 10 manly calories in it (Carville). Despite this slightly anti-feminist slip in their marketing the behemoth company has continued to be successful and will continue to distribute fizzy fruity sweet drinks to the people for a very long…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our competitors will be large producers of soft drinks such as Coca-Cola with Minute Maid products and PepsiCo with Tropicana products. The Coca-Cola Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc hold respectively 13.1% and 6.4% of the fruits juices market. Coca-Cola is the world’s biggest soft drink company with more than 500 brands, including 17 brands that produce more than a billion dollars in income (Slcher, 2015). PepsiCo cl has 22 brands that create more than a billion dollars in income. Both organizations spend tremendous measures of cash on advancement, publicizing and advertising, and on fortifying their transportation system. According to Grewal and Levy, since 2010 Coca-Cola and its packaging partners have put more than $50 billion in new offices, dispersion framework, gear, and retail client enactments. PepsiCo spent in 2013 about 5.9% of its net income on promoting and showcasing (Grewal & Levy, 2010). Both organizations have wide geographic visibility around the country and internationally. Thus, LaMarquise will be threatening companies such as Sunmet, Tree Top, etc. which are our direct competitors in the market of concentrated fruit juices. So, through our strategy, we show our product as unique and different from other companies’ product (Bailey,…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Pepper Snapple is a smaller competitor to Coca-Cola. However, Pepsico is Coca-Cola’s rival competitor due to its relative size. Both have global recognized brands that compete in product differentiation instead of pricing. For instance, a 12-ounce can of Coke is usually priced similar to a 12-ounce can of Pepsi. Nonetheless, Coke attempted to change the taste of its product in the 1980s (i.e., product differentiation). Unfortunately, the New Coke was rejected by the public and reintroduced the original Coke as Coke Classic. Finally, due to the recent decrease in buyer demand, there has been an increase in competitive rivalry between the two brands. As a result, rivalry among competing sellers has…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dr. Pepper

    • 4939 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Dr Pepper has a very loyal market. The majority of sales go to a small portion of the total target population. Dr Pepper tries to maintain consumers and gets its message out to its audience in a variety of ways to help…

    • 4939 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What quacker failed to realize is what realy made the success of Snapple.The company ,didn’t operate like most beverage producers.Instead of having a company owned plant that handled the…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr Pepper Snapple Group

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    WikiWealth.com Find information anyw here; get answ ers here. Research & analysis for every investment.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marketing and Snapple

    • 3408 Words
    • 14 Pages

    From 1972-1993 Snapple Fruit Juice Company flourished while many startup premium fruit drinks struggled and, in many cases, failed. In fact, most of Snapple's successful competitors during this time were sold to larger distribution companies allowing Snapple to create a Brand image and distribution alliance for the "smaller guy." They were a cult classic, promoted by loud, brash promoters like Howard Stern and Rush Limbaugh who had huge followings of independent, "stick-it-to-the-man" listeners. Snapple also created the legend of Wendy Kaufman, a former truck dispatcher and employee of Snapple. She was an instant success with the kind of style and attitude that matched Snapple's independent image. As the product began to grow so did distribution, product line, and understanding of what made the product great. Snapple and the original owners, however, sold control of the company to the Thomas H. Lee Company in 1992 for $27.9 million who then sold to Quaker in 1993 for $1.7 billion. The high-priced opportunity for Quaker was full of potential, yet after three disappointing years, Snapple was sold again. Some suggest that the purchase of Snapple was a bad move for Quaker, and the declining sales may have proved that point. However, Quaker did not understand what led to the original success of the product and tried to change the four P's. Eventually, Quaker sold the product to Triarc and it would be Mike Weinstein's responsibility to improve the declining sales and brand name success of Snapple. This paper will first analyze the success of Snapple from 1972-1993 under original ownership. Secondly, it will investigate Quaker from 1994-1997 determining if they made an error in purchasing the company, or if the owners managed it poorly. Third, how the Snapple brand compared to the competition will be addressed. Finally, three high priority initiatives Mike Weinstein and Triarc should implement to save Snapple will be identified.…

    • 3408 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr Pepper 4Ps

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (Details to convince): In the United States, Dr Pepper Snapple Group does not have a complete network of bottlers and distributors, so the drink is sometimes bottled under contract by Coca-Cola or Pepsi bottlers. Currently, the majority of Pepsi and Coke bottlers bottling Dr Pepper are owned by PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company after their buyouts of their major bottlers.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As described in the case study, Snapple flourished throughout 1972 and 1993 due to various reasons. Firstly, as the owners of Snapple realized that the popularity of no preservative fruit juices was increasing, they ceased the opportunity and decided to make a business out of it. As they were the first ones in this business, they got a chance to charge high prices and experiment products.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Favorite Brand Paper

    • 1366 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Coca-Cola Company is an exceptional brand because they have built loyal customer relationships through the added value of their various community efforts, successful execution of the marketing concept, and established an effective marketing mix. The company’s competitor’s, PepsiCo and Dr Pepper Snapple Group, lack the commitment to improve their carbonated soft drink market share rating by meeting their customer wants and needs.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For competitive success in the alternative beverage industry, PepsiCo’s key success factors are product innovation and differentiation.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays