In the beginning Martin Dysart is portrayed to fit the ‘comfortable view’ of what is normal. He is illustrated as a honourable man who rarely strays from the confines set by society. However we discover through conversations with Hesther and personal reflections that he is deeply troubled. Suddenly our view of Dysart is compromised as both us, as an audience, and Dysart question his normality. Along with this our perception of normality is skewed as we wonder whether there is such a quality. Dysart feels that by removing one’s uniqueness he is destroying part of their personality, simply so they can fit the comfortable view of what is normal. As children we care little for the normality set by society. ‘The normal is the good smile in a child's eyes. There's also the dead stare in a million adults. It both... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2008, 06). How Does Peter Shaffer Use Themes as Devices in Equus to Validate the Unpleasant.. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 06, 2008, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Does-Peter-Shaffer-Use-Themes-Devices-151886.html
"How Does Peter Shaffer Use Themes as Devices in Equus to Validate the Unpleasant." StudyMode.com. 06 2008. 06 2008 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Does-Peter-Shaffer-Use-Themes-Devices-151886.html>.
"How Does Peter Shaffer Use Themes as Devices in Equus to Validate the Unpleasant.." StudyMode.com. 06, 2008. Accessed 06, 2008. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Does-Peter-Shaffer-Use-Themes-Devices-151886.html.