Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Does Government Intervention Help Promote Economic Stability and Growth?

Powerful Essays
1738 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Government Intervention Help Promote Economic Stability and Growth?
Does Government intervention help promote economic stability and growth?

Economic stability I will define as a phase of steady control for an economy. Growth is a rise in the productive capacity of an economy. Steady growth is arguably the main over-arching economic objective when looking at macroeconomics.
Government intervention is defined by actions on the part of government that affect any economic activity.

The question has implications; in a modern context a society without state intervention is almost non-existent. I wish to explore whether it is useful and if so to what extent.
Because the basic economic problem in deciding how to allocate scarce resources affects all economies, some vastly different approaches and perspectives have formed in order to find a solution. The question is highly contentious and has no definitive answer. Each perspective has its own advantages and disadvantages.

The first perspective is often classed as a ‘mixed economy’ approach, which encompasses state capitalism and other similar systems. There are different types of mixed economies.
China and Russia are both advocates of state capitalism – a form of capitalism that relies on the intervention of the state to boost and support certain industries. Over the past three decades, China’s GDP has grown at an average rate of “9.5%” according to the Economist in a special report. (1) Not only is it successful on a macroeconomic scale, it can also show success on a microeconomic scale: three Chinese state owned companies rank among the world’s ten biggest companies by revenue, and the top 129 Chinese state owned enterprises in 2010 had net profits of $151 billion, according to the same report. It is also argued that it makes it “easier for emerging countries to learn from the rest of the world.”
This system does also have issues, Josh Lerner, a professor at Harvard Business School, describes state-sponsored innovation as a “boulevard of broken dreams.” This is due to the problems with productivity and innovation within state owned enterprises and the general support of the state. As a source Mr. Lerner is both credible and unreliable, Harvard business school is ranked amongst the top business universities by many which gives him a reputation, at Harvard Mr. Lerner would have easier access to information and this makes him reliable, however, he may have a vested interest in opposing state capitalism because his US roots. As a capitalist country it would be expected that he’d oppose other systems. This is less likely amongst prestigious liberal universities like Harvard where differences in academic opinion are welcomed.
Government intervention particularly in state capitalism can lead to extremely competitive and contestable markets. It can result in private companies simply not being able to compete with state owned companies, as the Economist puts it: “China’s ability to make huge strategic investments, […] puts private companies at a severe disadvantage.” Because there is typically less internal regulation in state owned company’s, productivity is often lower, consumer satisfaction is less valued therefore risks to improve are rarer. Even in more capitalist economies if firms are bailed out and cushioned with state support then unsafe risks become more frequent. This has dire effects, as illustrated by the recent global recession in which credit was unwisely traded, which stunted growth and made the global economy volatile.
State capitalism seems to promote economic stability, and propel growth, but keep the economy too stable by choking innovation and productivity, and propelling growth too far to create monopolies.

The Economist as a source is generally reliable, however it must be noted that its alignment is against state capitalism; they are advocates of economic liberalism. According to a former editor Bill Emmot “the Economist's philosophy has always been liberal, not conservative,” (2). As a generally balanced paper they have well-documented and supported counter arguments, which makes more credible. They have a reputation for their strong minded but fair and well-researched articles that they would be keen to maintain, coupled with their extensive resources and contacts, which gives the paper easier access to information. They are a credible source.

The second perspective is one of pure capitalism, supported by very few. Adam Smith was a key proponent of the free-market system in the 1700s; he states that the individual is “led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his [selfish] intention.” (3) He discusses how it is more beneficial to society that our intentions are self-centred: “By pursuing his [the individual’s] own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.” Past economies are some of the only truly capitalist societies in the world; in nearly all-modern capitalist societies there is at least minimal regulation. The growth rates of England in the 1700s were extremely high and the economy was very stable. However, there was unknown and unrecognised poverty in England prior to the 1800s, which makes his statements about the welfare of society less credible. A problem with pure capitalism is that income is unjustly distributed to be more in favour of the middle class. John Maynard Keynes notes the unjust nature of profiteering, “To convert the business man into the profiteer is to strike a blow at capitalism.” He further explains that this is due to the lack of positive input profiteers have on society “The business man is only tolerable so long as his gains can be held to bear some relation to what, roughly and in some sense, his activities have contributed to society." (4)
Keynes was a key proponent of Interventionism and is one of the most respected and well-known economists of all time, and is particularly renowned for his work in the field of macroeconomics.
The Guardian supports this by claiming that “much business is now seen as no more than profiteering.” (4) Because the nature of pure capitalism is unequal, the gap between the poor and the rich is substantial. However this ordinarily would not mean GDP was low or the economy was volatile. In the same article the guardian mentions the impact this inequality has on society. “[Inequality] has corrosive effects: unequal societies are unhappier, less healthy, and have more crime.” Higher crime levels and unhappiness undoubtedly harms both the growth and stability of the economy. The Guardian is generally centre-left wing, this would mean that they may be expected to be critical of capitalist societies and favour political and economic systems that promote welfare over ones that promote economic stability and growth. They are generally, however, considered to be a more neutral paper. Although they may be credible in their research and the balancing of their arguments, their political orientation weakens their reliability significantly.

The Daily Mail comes to a similar conclusion regarding capitalism, when discussing the materialism of the last decade; they state in an article that “Nowhere was this selfishness more pronounced than at capitalism's epicentre.” (5) The Daily Mail is a right-wing paper. This makes their statement more reliable, as it is contrary to a pro-capitalist view that they would be expected to advocate.

The final perspective is one of total Government intervention; put into practice by the USSR and China in the mid 20th century. Russia and China’s application of communism had very different effects on economic growth and stability. The main criticism of communism is that it lends itself to corruption, due to the enormous amount of concentrated power it offers. It allows a “murderous dictator” such as Stalin the chance to implement a “regime of terror.” (5) The growth rates were enormous during Lenin and Stalin’s rule, and the economy was catapulted into industry. The economy was stable and Russia became a serious global competitor at the cost of the welfare of millions. China’s implementation of communism was less successful; although there was a rise in GDP it wasn’t until later that the economy really excelled. “It was not until the post-Mao period, and the end of the political instability of the Cultural revolution, that the economy really took off.” (7) This was arguably due to the odd disposition of Mao, and his attack on China’s culture. Mao’s China also saw the death of countless people and poor welfare across the country.

The reason the models differ could be due to historical and cultural factors rather than economic. The economies compared are from completely different contexts and cultures, consequently comparing them may hold little relevance.

Despite the difficulties in hindering productivity and innovation, I contend that a mixed economy promotes economic growth and stability the most, whilst still supporting welfare. I also contend that without regard for welfare, it is indisputable that full government control promotes economic stability and growth the most effectively, but its impact on welfare is so horrifying that it is not a realistic and practical solution.
There are recognisable limitations to my conclusion; because of the complexity and variation within interventionism and capitalism I cannot appropriately reach a conclusion, as I haven’t considered all models of capitalism and various economies. More research would be required to appropriately address the question.

(1) The Economist, Special Report ‘State Capitalism,’ taken from the January 21st 2012 issue.
(2) The Guardian newspaper, from the article ‘Time for a referendum on the Monarchy,’ published on December 8th 2000, last time the site was visited was on the 12th of April, http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/dec/08/monarchy.comment
(3) Adam Smith’s book called ‘The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776, on page 264.
(4) The Guardian newspaper, from the article ‘The Case for Moral Capitalism,’ published on the 25th December 2011, last time the site was visited was on the 12th of April, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/25/a-capitalist-revolution
(5) The Daily Mail newspaper, from the article ‘’Immoral Capitalism,’ dealt a blow.’ Published on the 21st November 2008, last time the site was visited was on the 14th of April, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/markets/article-1647804/Immoral-capitalism-dealt-a-blow.html (6) The British Broadcasting Company, from the information page ‘Joseph Stalin,’ last visited on the 14th of April, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/stalin_joseph.shtml (7) The British Broadcasting Company, from the article ‘the economy’s long march, ‘ last visited on the 14th of April,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/special_report/1999/09/99/china_50_years_of_communism/453330.stm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Government Intervention

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are some positive effects government intervention could produce. These pros are, in fact, few, and questionable, at that. Take for instance, the situation with Microsoft. The government is sticking its nose in where it doesn't belong. Let's try and get passed that point for a moment and examine the good that could come out of government intervention.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Potential Growth: This is how quickly the economy could grow. It is known as the percentage annual increase in the economies capacity to produce.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of the state-owned enterprises is like a big, broken-down truck that is blocking the road to development in China. Some traffic can find its way around the wreck but the difficulty that it creates grows with time. People are reluctant to destroy the truck because of the thought of how useful it would be if only it worked.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mixed Economy

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economy of a country is affected by economic fluctuations such as conditions of boom and depression. Such changes benefit some and harm others. In such a situation appropriate policy measures are required by the government to affect the levels of aggregate demand. Such measures are called stabilization measures. These measures aim at avoiding the situations of inflation and unemployment.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To increase productivity and living standards, governments can can: 1. Encourage saving and Investment: Goal: invest more current resources in the production of capital to increase physical capital (K). Trade-off: The opportunity cost of investment is that someone must forgo current : consumption in order to save and invest sumption Note that: because of diminishing returns, an increase in the saving rate leads to higher growth of productivity and income only for a while. In the long run, higher saving rate leads to a , higher level of productivity and income but not to a higher growth of productivity and ductivity income. Policies: - Saving incentives: lowering taxation on savings will increase saving The quantity of : saving. loanable funds (supply) will increase and the equilibrium interest rate will fall (see supply/demand for loanable funds). Result : higher saving and investment pply/demand - Investment incentives: lowering taxation for firms that build a new factory or buy new equipment for example will increase investment (demand for loanable funds) and the equilibrium interest rate will rise. Result: higher saving and investment. Result:…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Capitalism

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles mainly talk about rise of state capitalism, its growth and actions of the government, the variations of state capitalism, benefits and flaws and its future.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * An economic system may involve production, allocation of economic inputs, distribution of economic outputs, firms, and the government to answer the economic problem of resource allocation.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social regulations

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The problem of state presence in socio-economic life has always been and will be the subject of heated discussions among economists, sociologists and political scientists. This issue is not only an ideological one, but also of significant importance for the state functioning. It is undisputable that the implementation of particular tasks by the state turns out indispensable for the functioning of society, however, in terms of market existence the underlying advantages, to be discussed below, are much less favorable.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government intervention(1government intervention are Regulatory actions taken by a government in order to affect or interfere with decisions made by individuals, groups, or organizations regarding social and economic matters.)1, in the above case the government is influencing the milk powered industry by giving subsidy.…

    • 759 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Generally speaking governments intervene in the market for two main reasons: "social efficiency and equity". [1] One does not expect to see a government intervene in the economy to favor a firm, or because the government would profit from such an intervention in the way a firm sees profit (except maybe voters positive perception of the intervention).…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democratic Socialism

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Using all the benefits from both systems into one government that utilizes command system programs such as national health care and, market economy features including a free consumer market. While the producing market would be regulated by the government to prevent large monopolies from becoming established to highlight the success of small family owned business’s to create local employment. This combination of a command and market economic system allows the nations citizens to be worry free because they have social programs as insurance to sustain a comfortable life with the assurance that the economy will rise again with the stability of the government. However, in any democratic socialist mixed economy government overspending can be common if government leaders were elected without proper consideration of their possible actions in office. A study by Newsweek of…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    macroeconomic stability

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Keynesian theorists also have various ways of achieving this goals through both the government and the central banks which have the mandate to use such policies.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    High unemployment is bad for the economy. Unemployment means resources are not being utilized properly. Therefore governments take measures to increase employment.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Types of Economic Systems

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The last economic system is the mixed market system. The mixed market system can be associated with both the planned and the market economies. A mixed market shows traits from both systems. For example cigarettes can be sold legally but government restricts minors from purchasing the item. (Ebert/griffin, pg 12).…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic Growth

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Economic growth is the increase in the amount of the goods and services produced by an economy over time. It is conventionally measured as the percent rate of increase in real gross domestic product, or real GDP. Growth is usually calculated in real terms, i.e. inflation-adjusted terms, in order to obviate the distorting effect of inflation on the price of the goods produced. Economic growth typically refers to growth of potential output, i.e., production at "full employment". It talks about how countries can advance their economies. Economic growth is defined as a positive change in the level of production of goods and services by a country over a certain period of time. Economic growth is often desirable for a country as a whole.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays