The comments of the article.
Earth Hour is one of annual event that tries to raise awareness of energy issues by convincing people to shut off the lights in their houses, businesses, and public buildings for an hour on one specific night. Based on the article “Does Earth Hour Do More Harm than Good?” published by Huff Post Science. I have been evaluating, there some of fallacies that defect the weaken arguments in this article such as Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc, Appeal to Ignorance, Begging the Question and Ad Populum. Firstly, the fallacy that had in this article which is Hasty Generalization. Hasty Generalization is making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is a typical or just too small). Stereotypes about people are a common example of the principle underlying hasty generalization. For example, based on this article (paragraph 3 line 11); (P1) In fact, I think Earth Hour is exactly the wrong way to go about educating the public on energy issues. (P2) When I look at how people respond to Earth Hour, I see as much confusion being spread as awareness. (C) Earth Hour event perpetuates myths about environmentalism and given people the wrong idea about what it will actually take to solve our energy problems. In my opinion, the author should not making assumption that Earth Hour perpetuates myths about environmentalism and given people the wrong idea to solve energy problem based on how the people respond to Earth Hour. It is because the author only sees the people respond in certain area not the whole world. Secondly, I have been evaluating that there are some of the argument in this article had fallacy such as Post Hoc. Post Hoc (also called false cause) is assuming that because B comes after A, A caused B. Of course, sometimes one event really does cause another one that comes later. But sometimes two events that seem related in time are not really related as cause and event. That is,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document