Preview

Do you agree the first cause argument proves God's existence?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do you agree the first cause argument proves God's existence?
Do you agree that the first cause argument proves that God exists?
The first cause argument takes the existence of the universe to entail the existence of a being that created it. It does so based on the fact that the universe had a beginning. There must, the first cause argument says, be something that caused that beginning, a first cause of the universe.
I do believe that the first cause argument proves God’s existence.
This is because the universe consists of a series of events stretched across time in a long causal chain. Each one of these events is the cause of the event that comes after it, and the effect of the event that comes before it. As a result something must have been at the top of the chain that caused everything which I believe is God. In addition the first cause argument tells us that the past cannot stretch back into infinity but rather must have a beginning. The argument then proceeds by suggesting that if the universe has a beginning then there must be something outside it that brought it into existence. This being outside the universe, this Creator, the first cause argument tells us, is God.
However some people may disagree with my idea that the first cause argument proves that God exists. One reason for this is because of the big bang theory (not the T.V series). This theory tells us that matter was once concentrated in a really small point. This began to enlarge rapidly in a hot explosion and it’s still expanding today. Unlike the first-cause argument, this argument is not self-refuting because it does not imply that god has a cause. If god had no beginning in time, he need not have a cause. Moreover, this argument doesn't deny the possibility of an infinite causal chain. It simply denies that the actual chain of causes is infinite. Another reason could be that not everything has a cause. As scientists have observed some events that have no apparent cause, that appear to be entirely random. Subatomic particles behave very strangely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Does the universe exist? If the universe exists, what caused it to exist? The universe itself could not have created or caused itself. If the cause or explanation for the universe is something other than itself, what is that cause. If the universe is a contingent being, did other contingent beings cause it or did a non-contingent being cause the universe? Something caused the universe to exist. There was a First Cause. This First Cause has no beginning and no end, it is eternal. What could possibly be powerful enough to create the universe with all of its complexity and depth if not God? To say that contingent things just exist with no cause does not explain why they exist. Can a contingent being give an explanation for how or why it exists? If not, it follows that the only explanation is a non-contingent being began the process. The Cosmological Argument is not meant to give exhaustive proof for the existence of God. It is just a piece of the pie that encourages a…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The key idea in cosmological arguments is that the world, the universe, and everything in them are dependent on something other than themselves for their existence. In other words, cosmological arguments attempt to justify God's existence on the assumption that nothing can come from nothing, and that God must exist in order for anything to be here.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas was a very important man to the cosmological argument; it was him who came up with some of the strongest theories to support the argument. He came up with his five proofs which to him proved the cosmological argument to be true. One of his proof was the ‘cause’ proof, this goes as follows; nothing can change by itself therefore everything is caused and as Aquinas didn’t believe in infinite regress he said that there couldn’t be a series of infinite causes. So there must be a first cause, a cause that isn’t itself caused by another, and Aquinas would say this is God. But if infinite regress was proved to be true or even possible it would completely undermine this argument and prove it invalid, this is the same case as many of the other theories of the cosmological argument.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The premises of the argument, can be restructured to say that premise one claimes that “There exists an order of causes. The second premise states that “This order of causes can not go in a circle”. The third premise asserts that “This order cannot go on forever” The fourth premise infers that if the first three premises are true, then that concludes that “There must be a first cause in the order of causes. This cause is what “everyone calls God”. Consequently “There is a first cause in the order of causes, which everyone calls God.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological Argument is a posteriori argument (knowledge gained after experience) which attempts to prove that there is a rational basis for the belief in God. This argument is synthetic as it uses senses and is distinctive as it uses evidence of the universe to prove that God exists. The argument attempts to prove that God exists by evaluating the scale and nature of the cosmos. In order for this argument to succeed it has to be inductive and produce overwhelming evidence to show Gods existence. Arguments, like this one, can be interpreted in various ways so there will be different conclusions about God, in other words religious ambiguity. Furthermore most supporters of the Cosmological Argument argue that the universe could only have come into existence if it were caused by an uncaused cause. Thomas Aquinas, a Dominican friar, adapted the argument. He stated that everything must have a cause, nothing is its own cause, and a chain of causes cannot be infinite and that there must be a first cause. This first cause must be an infinite, necessary being.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes casts everything into doubt in the first meditation, including God Himself. He then comes to this disproval of this theory therefore concluding that God exists. This is brought about through the causal argument.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is one of the most famous of all philosophical arguments that address the existence of a supernatural being who created the material universe. The supernatural being whom created the material universe is the logical core of what is commonly meant by the word God within the classic theistic religious traditions of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity with reasoning that constitutes a philosophical argument for the existence of God. Many cosmological questions on religion have intrigued human beings across all cultures since the beginning of recorded history and continue to interest us today. The Cosmological Argument is also known as the First Cause Proof that addresses that something must require a first cause to be brought into existence. Although many philosophers and people are skeptics of this theory based on the unbelief of God existence and logically thinking that God would need a cause to existence. The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is not the strongest argument for religious groups to prove reason for the existence of God.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological argument is an argument that attempts to prove the existence of God, it is also known as the causation argument which argues that as all events require a cause, if the universe is an event it must have a cause and that cause is God.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was propounded by St Thomas Aquinas, and the ideas to this argument are found in his book Summa Theologica. He takes the universe as his starting point, because he knows for definite, that exists. However, he also says the universe is the end of his chain. Aquinas describes this chain as a ‘domino effect’ because once a causer causes something to happen; this then causes something else to happen, and so on. The causer here is God, and he is the Uncaused Cause, because God has always existed. Aquinas argued that the universe was created by a series of causes and effects, hence why he uses it as his end point in his theory. If you traced all of these causes back to the creation of the Universe, you would result in God; the First Motion (Unmoved Mover), First Cause (Uncaused Cause) and the First Being…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting off, the atheistic view of the beginning of the universe occurring by chance is irrational and irreverent in many ways. The thought of the universe just existing from no cause, let alone not a personal cause is just illogical. This universe has a contingency for God and the Kalam cosmological argument proves this. The Kalam cosmological argument is a well-organized argument for God that has been developed from Muslim philosophers al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, and has been reinvented by philosopher William Lane Craig. The Kalam argument is very simple and straightforward. It is dealt with as a series of dilemmas. Those dilemmas starts with since the universe exists, is there a beginning or no beginning, is that beginning caused or uncaused, and is that cause personal or impersonal. The first premise states that whatever begins to exist as a cause. This premise if very logical and denying it is only possible to have things come from a cause is counterintuitive. The second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument states that universe began…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different forms of arguments for the existence of God. It starts with the philosophers theories which goes way back in time and they believe that there is a God by what people has drawn through history and some personal experiences. The primary focus is the philosophical arguments which are the ontological argument, the first cause argument, the argument from design and the moral argument. When we as people look at each of these arguments it will give us more knowledge in the way that we think about them rationally that there is a god. The first two supporters that used the ontological argument were St. Anselm an eleventh century philosopher theologian and archbishop of Canterbury and French philosopher Rene…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument looks to the world to prove God’s existence rather than pure definitions. The proponent of the cosmological argument was St. Thomas Aquinas, a theologian in the eleventh century CE (Solomon). He proposed that everything that exists must have a cause, and that the cause was God (Aquinas). Aquinas’ first point was based off of motion, that nothing can be both the mover and moved. An item sitting in place has the potential to be moving, but cannot move unless something that is already moving imparts motion to it…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays