Bibliography: 45
Bibliography: 45
The legislation of ethics is not just a modern occurrence, but the feeling that an individual can do so is debatable. Just because an individual keeps the letter of the law, does not necessarily make him or her ethical. Graham (1995) argues that ethical decisions come not from those in authority (of which is the law), but are “independently arrived at principled beliefs that are used creatively in the analysis and resolution of moral dilemmas” (p. 47).…
My ethical perspective after taking the Ethics Awareness Inventory questionnaire is most closely aligned with obligation. The ‘Obligation’ perspective in the EAI, represented by the letter O, is most closely aligned with a deontological theory in which the focus is on an individual’s duty or obligation to do what is morally right. This theory looks to what we intend by our actions, rather than the consequences of our actions. Immanuel Kant is the philosopher most frequently associated with this moral theory. By appealing to ‘conscience’ and the notion that individuals are moved to action by moral reason, Kant seeks to justify that ordinary moral judgments, in the Judeo-Christian tradition, are legitimately true (Williams, 2008). I base my ethical perspective on one’s duty or obligation to do what is morally right. I believe we choose how we act and what rules we are willing to follow. The results show that from my perspective, ethical principles must be appropriate under any circumstances, be respectful of human dignity, and committed to promoting individual freedom and autonomy. The ethical profile is least closely aligned with (E) equity. The ‘Equity’ perspective in the EAI, represented by the letter E, is most closely aligned with a postmodern theory that emerged in the early 1970s and developed as a critique of the traditional principles associated with philosophical thinking in ‘modern’ times (generally considered as a part of the…
Shafer-Landau, R. (2012). The fundamentals of ethics. (2nd ed., p. G-6). New York: Oxford University Press.…
Emmanuel Levinas begins this excerpt by discussing the phenomenology of suffering. He has many definitions for the concept of suffering such as something that is passive or evil or a “senseless pain”; however he refuses to acknowledge at any point reasoning behind this concept. The title of the essay really begins to jump out at the reader during the first few paragraphs of his phenomenology. Under all the metaphorical rhetoric lies a reoccurring theme of this ethical struggle to acknowledge suffering as anything more than a reality without rationality. He goes on to discuss pain in a physical and psychological light. It is a suffering so powerful it has the ability to “absorb the rest of consciousness” but lacks the ability to cross exteriority and thus renders someone else’s pain immeasurable to me. It seems as if Levinas only gives suffering a meaning when the person contemplating the evil is personally experiencing it, making it subjectively real and “making spirituality closer than confidence in any kind of theodicy.”…
In our generation, living with principles define a person as having fundamental truth of beliefs. Some of the most crucial ones are justice, honesty and paternalism. Without justice, there will be no such thing as moral rightness. Having justice is significant since it protects the fairness of all individuals. Without it, nobody will have a firm view on the ideal concept of moral rightness that is based on ethics, law and equality. This can be related to…
Thiroux (1995) created his own set of principles of ethics, which can be applied to any situation. 1) The value of life, 2) Goodness or rightness, 3) Justice or fairness, 4) truth telling or honesty and 5) individual freedom. Ethical acts are executed in every day life even if we acknowledge it or not, the way we greet colleagues and clients even in the way in which we say ‘good morning. Tschudin (1999) p175.…
Paraphrase of “A Framework For Ethical Thinking Paraphrase” by Manuel Velasques. Dennis Moberg.Michael J Moberg. This essay is typed to help the reader understand ethics a little bit easier. We all have a dream of how we could make ourselves better both ethically and morally. Now I am going to try to help interpret another authors ideas a little bit easier to understand. Ethics are the ways human beings act when faced with certain situations. Ethics are not following the laws. The law sees things as black and white in a world full of gray decisions. The law is not always right but neither are ethics. This is how the law and ethics are similar now lets learn about feelings.…
Throughout history, many events around the global community have occurred that have successfully proven a main point made in Kaplan’s article, “The Return of Ancient Times.” The basic principle of said claim stated that any person who is insistent on doing only good deeds must learn to sacrifice their morality if a decision that goes against their moral code may in the long run benefit them more than the alternative option. It is necessary to show a sense of pragmatism in select situations to move in a forward facing direction.…
Substitution is another fundamental theme in Focus. Ethical relationship is an essential character of all human beings. Which is to say, it is our ethical relations that define us, make us individuals. Such relations stems from the face, the face of the other. “The face speaks to me and thereby invites me to a relation” (Totality and Infinity 198). Substitution as articulated by Levinas is related to “self-coincidence, self-possession, and sovereignty” (Basic Philosophical Writings 79). In this vein, Levinas redefines the Western philosophical concept of identity. Levinas states that, “my responsibility for the other is the for of the relationship, the signifyingness of signification, which signifies in saying before saying itself of the said”…
We have discussed three major ethical or systems of morality; Ethical Egoism, utilitarianism, and Kantianism. The three systems go to different degrees in respect to the two ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence. Although quite different from each other in many ways some of them do share some common principles between them. In this paper I will discuss the similarities and differences of the three systems. We also watched the video case study “The Old Person’s Friend” which I will relate one of the theories that I believe best deals with this case.…
The purpose of this paper is to discuss Ethical theories and their foundations from this week’s reading material. One is to describe the theories, discuss plus add one more that is not in the book. To understand l theories one needs to know understand that a theory is based on observation or testing, there is really no right or wrong answer to what a theory is.…
A person’s actions impacts their peers, communities, and the world. Many people aspire to be “good” people, and hope to put good out into the world. One can define “good” in many different ways, but depending on an individual's ethical code, they may or may not be considered good. The three major ethical theories which we addressed are Kantian Ethics, Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics. A strong argument could be made for each theory, but one sticks out as the best and most reasonable theory of ethics. Kantian Ethics is the best universal theory of ethics, as it allows for individual rights and is specific enough to follow.…
The life of an individual and society are based on and guided by certain fundamental ethical and moral principles. These principles are drawn basically from Divine Knowledge. Some of these principles are as follows…
Imagine that you’re walking down a crowded street and an old woman with bags in her hand is walking towards you. The handles on her bags break, and all of her belongings go tumbling to the ground. People walk by, look at her, and keep walking. Unlike them, you stop and help her pick everything up. She simply looks at you and says, “Thank you”. You smile at her and then continue on your way, feeling much better about yourself because you cared enough to stop and help. Some people think we ought to only do what is best for ourselves, but I will present evidence that this is a misunderstanding of ethics and the incorrect way of approaching ethics. Ethical egoism doesn’t say that we have no choice but to act in our self-interest like psychological egoism. Instead, it says that we ought to only do what is in our personal rational self-interest; this self-interest should be long term. For example, an ethical egoist realizes that I should go to the dentist to get a cavity removed even though it causes me pain because it can prevent even more pain in the future. In this paper, I will explain what ethical egoism is, give examples why ethical egoism is incorrect, provide examples that support ethical egoism, and clarify why those reasons are inaccurate.…
The question of ethics is one that is linked with the history of mankind. Ethics deals withthe character and conduct and morals of human beings. It deals with good or bad, right or wrong behaviour, it evaluates conduct against some absolute criteria and putsnegative or positive values on it (Hanekom, 1984:58).Guy (1990:06), agrees with Hanekom because he views ethics as the study of moral judgements and right and wrong conduct. Furthermore, he views ethics as different from law because it involves no formal sanctions. It is different from etiquette because it goesbeyond mere social convention. It is different from religion because it makes notheological assumptions. It is different from prudence because it goes beyond self-interests of others. Ethics is both a process of inquiry and code of conduct. As acode of conduct, it is like an inner eye that enables people to see the rightness orwrongness of their actions (Guy, 1990:06).…