Preview

discuss two errors in attribution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
discuss two errors in attribution
Discuss two errors in attributions.
Attribution, defined as assigning a quality or character to a person or an object, in the context of Psychology, refers to the classification of factors that affect behaviour. Behaviour is attributed to either or both dispositional factors and situational factors. Dispositional factors refer to the internal causes of an individual’s behaviour, whilst situational factors deal with the external causes of behaviour which can include the social setting and environment. Two common errors of attribution are the Fundamental attribution error (FAE) and Self-serving bias (SSB).
Fundamental attribution error is a term used to refer to a bias to attribute other people’s behaviour to internal causes rather than external circumstances. If people behave kindly towards us with a warm gesture we immediately assume and conclude that they have a kind personality whilst if they behave in ways that seem impolite to us (perhaps not greet us at all) we tend to think of them as rude. Instead of acknowledging the important role played by situational determinants of behaviour, we assume that other people’s behaviour reflects their dispositions.
A study that demonstrates the (FAE) is Jones and Harris (1967). These researchers asked their participants to read essays written by fellow students which were about Fidel Castro’s rule in Cuba and were either supportive or critical of Castro. There were two conditions- the choice condition and the no choice condition. The choice condition was that a group of the participants were told the essayists were given the choice whether to take a positive or negative view of Castro whilst in the no choice condition, another group of the participants were told that the essayist did not have any choice and that the experimenter had assigned them in the pro-Castro or anti-Castro role. As expected, participants in the choice condition assumed that the essays reflected the genuine attitudes of their writers. However,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biases assigned to a person without intention, awareness, effort, or control, often based on subliminal cues…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Attribution theory is concerned with how individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behaviour. Attribution theory assumes that people try to determine why people do what they do. When we (the observer) try to understand why another person (the actor) did something, we can either attribute one or more causes to that behaviour, internal/dispositional -the inference that a person is behaving in a certain way because of something about the person, such as attitude, character or personality. Or; external/situational - the inference that a person is…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error focuses generally on how people explain how and why things happen in a social setting. There is a strong tendency for people to explain their own behavior as a function of external situations, but attribute the behavior of others to internal factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error is when a person overestimates the influence of another person’s personality over a remark or behavior rather than giving credit to the influence the situation may have on the person. A famous experiment demonstrating this “error” was conducted by David Napolitan and George Goethals. In this experiment, they instructed a woman to act either rude and critical, or warm and friendly to each person individually. Half of the group was told that the woman would be acting spontaneously, and the other half was let in on the experiment. The result was that the assumptions about her personality did not change even though half the group had known that she was an actor. Each group assumed that because the woman behaved coldly, her personality was so. Even the group who was told that her behavior was situational had still believed that she was warm and friendly because of the way she was acting in the situation.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution in social behavior is the process of inferring the causes of events or behaviors. For example, in real life, attribution is something we all do every day, usually without any awareness of the underlying processes and biases that lead to…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power of Situations

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The “fundamental attribution error” is the biggest problem in what Ross and Nisbett conclude. The definition of the theory is clear-cut, but the author’s logic is based on empirical research that is not 100%. It could never be completely factual, as human personality traits, and emotion cannot be measured or removed from the equation. At first glance, their logic in presenting “evidence”…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error is the tendency for observers to underestimate situational influences and overestimate dispositional influences upon other's behavior. (Myers, 2008) In simple terms, when a person's behavior is unbecoming, we tend to automatically jump to a conclusion that the person has a bad behavior, they're rude, etc. Very seldom do we look at the situation that the person may be in, whether it's…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heider (1958) was the first to propose a theory on attribution known as the naïve psychologist (Culatta, 2013). Here he proposed that people try to make sense of our own and others’ behaviour by using their common sense (Cardwell, 1996). Heider initially discussed the distinction between situational and dispositional attribution (12Manage, 2014).…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Serving Bias

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fundamental attribution error and self-serving bias are similar in that they both are errors made using perception. Fundamental attribution error deals with wrongly explaining a behavior based on some factors that are internal. It can also be explained as over exaggerating a reason behind a person’s behavior or actions. For example, saying the reason that a person isn’t tying his or her shoe lace is because he or she is lazy. This is wrongly labelling a person with a particular characteristic trait based on limited information.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) principle states that man tends to ignore outside pressure and factors when judging the behavior of others. This means that people believe that a certain action or behavior was a cause of an internal motive rather than some influence from external pressure. In simple words, the FAE describes the inability to step inside other people’s shoes.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Normally people attribute positive occurrences to some internal factors or as a result of their actions while negative things are associated with external factors. According to Wood, people are somehow blind in perception of negative things that affect their lives. I have successfully, determined the existence of self-serving bias through a friends behavior and my own actions. In both cases, it is intrinsically hard to associate a negative occurrence with one’s own capacity. I normally find it easy to consider my poor performance in an examination to other factors rather than my own failure to prepare effectively for the exam. On closer look, I realize that…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Fundamental Attribution Error is the tendency for people to think that a person’s behavior and attitudes are due to their personal traits, while ignoring the significance of their situation on their behavior. The teacher Mr. Vernon makes this error when looking at John Bender. We learn as the kids are having lunch that Bender comes from an abusive home, and this would put him at risk for anti-social behavior. However it is evident from how Mr. Vernon treats…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locus of Control

    • 4438 Words
    • 18 Pages

    People vary in the way they attribute events, circumstances and certain happenings. It is somewhat puzzling to know why people differ in the way they view certain causes of events. Could this be something that is influenced by their different personalities? Some people may attribute a certain happening to their lives as consequences of their actions, but there are also some people who point towards external factors or situations to be the primary cause of the occurrence of certain events. The way people perceive or blame causes of certain happenings is called Attribution. In social psychology, attribution is referred as the way people perceive and interpret the causes of events and how this relates to their thinking and behavior. Attributions could range from dispositional to something which is uncontrollable and external. However, this paper does not intend to focus on attribution but on certain factors that influence attribution which is called Locus of Control.…

    • 4438 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social cognition explains the way people process knowledge relating to the social world. One way of judging the social world, is by attributing certain causes to particular behaviours. This is done through the use of attribution theories that use past stored information to come to the correct conclusions. Attribution theories help us understand what information we use and why we chose it, to assign a particular cause to an event. In 1958, Heider, (as cited in Buchanan, Anand, Joffe & Thomas, 2007) was the first to develop the idea that resulted in the creation of attribution theories. He said that people are like scientists who seek causes when evaluating people’s actions and categorise them as either internal/dispositional causes or external/situational causes. This essay will begin by describing the different types of attribution theories as well as some of their related research. It will then proceed to evaluate how useful attribution theories are in allowing us to understand how people make sense of social events. This will be done by highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of all the theories mentioned.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays