Discrimination between nests and non-nests is unjust.
This research paper is about investigating about the discriminations between native English speaker teachers and non-native English speaker teachers. To find the reasons and the effects of this discrimination and to explain it is the most priority of this paper. The data collection method contains interviews and important collections of study from various articles. The data proves the discrimination, which is mostly based on prejudice and false assumptions. Peoples view also comes into light by considering various surveys which shows negative attitude towards the non-native English speaking teachers; also it identifies a lot of differences between NESTs and non-NESTs in various aspects of teaching. Based on all the views, examples and facts it justifies that the discriminations are unfair and there is no easy way to choose a single best type of teacher because they are equally effective as a teacher considering their strengths and weakness.
Firstly I want give my gratitude to my instructor Dr. AQMA Rahman Bhuiyan for giving us this project and supporting us to complete it from the start to the end. I would also like to thank the former British Counsel teacher Kenrick Deen for his valuable interview which helped me achieve my research goals.
English is not just a language anymore; it has become almost a compulsory element for connecting the world together. As an international language it has an unavoidable significance in every country, thus it’s almost a necessity to learn English to cope with the modern world. Because of its demand new learners from all over the world showing deep interest to learn English and the road to the learner leads through the teachers. Just English has learners from all over the world; it also has teachers from all over the world teaching this language. Teachers who themselves learned English as a mother tongue and teachers who learned English as a foreign language (EFL). For this congenital distinction a division has been created among the teachers.
A division that separated the English teachers in two categories native English speaking teacher (NEST) and non-native English speaking teacher (non-NEST). Medgyes (1992) stated that a native speaker of English is an individual who was born in an English-speaking country. So the native English speaking teachers are basically English teachers who had learnt English as their mother tongue. On the other hand non-native English speaking teachers are the teachers, for whom English was not a first language, but a language which they learnt as a foreign language. Like almost always division contains a negative side, especially in this case, a negative side indeed appeared.
Many believe that for being born in an English speaking country NESTs are better than non-NESTs and consider the NESTs superior to the non-NESTs. Maum (2002) states that supporter of the NESTs believe “it is necessary to distinguish between native- and nonnative-English-speaking teachers because their differences are, in fact, their strengths and should be recognized.” Those who feel otherwise think that this difference gives dominance to NESTs in the English language teaching (ELT) profession and contributes to discrimination in hiring practice.
If one is bought up in an English speaking country does that make him a better teacher in ELT context? So is it also means that a native English speaker teacher without teaching training or a higher level degree is better than a non-native English speaker teacher? So it is never possible for the non-native English speakers to learn as much English as the native English speakers? Such questions may arise regarding this discrimination.
* Research questions
1. What are the people’s perceptive on the NESTs and the non-NESTs? 2. Is there a difference between a NEST and non-NEST?...