Preview

Differences in Triel and Grand Jury

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences in Triel and Grand Jury
"List and explain the differences between a trial jury and a grand jury." With every person convicted they have a right to trial and jury. There is a grand jury. Second kind of jury is a trial or petite jury. If the paragraphs below I will try to explain the differences between the two . A grand jury is a group of jurors who hear testimony for the prosecution's witnesses as well as a statement about the crime from the prosecutor. A grand jury is run mostly by the prosecutor, and although the suspect does have a right to speak at a grand jury hearing, he or she can only be cross-examined by the prosecutor, and the defense attorney plays no role.Most grand juries contain between sixteen and twenty-three jurors.A grand jury is closed to the public.Most grand jury hearings consist only of the witnesses, the jurors and the prosecutor.A grand jury consists of jurors who serve for the period of a court term, which can be up to eighteen months. A petit or trial jury is a group of jurors who hear testimony from both sides during a criminal trial proceeding. The petit jury's purpose is either to convict or acquit a defendant of criminal charges. A petit jury consists of six-to-twelve jurors. The petit jury must convict or acquit. A petit jury trial is open to the public. A petit jury trial can have as many attendees as the court room can hold. Most petit juries consist of jurors who are selected to participate in one single trial, which often lasts less than ten days. Even high-profile cases last a few months at most, and after that, the jurors have completed their service. In a trial overseen by a petit jury, the jurors must be unanimous in their decision to convict or acquit. If the jury is split one way or another, the judge will declare either a hung jury or a mistrial, and the prosecution can try the case again if the people wish. However, a grand jury does not have to be unanimous. The exact number or jurors varies from state-to-state, but in federal grand

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A jury trial is a trial with 12 people from different background that get to choose if you are guilty or not. The vote has to be unanimous. A bench trial is a trial where the judge is deciding whether you are guilty or not. You get to choose but they both have their ups and downs. The defendant might choose a bench trial because their case might be complicated and confuse a jury. The defendant might choose a jury trial because the verdict is harder to agree upon. When it come to both of the ways to have a trial, none of them is 100% sure if their verdict is…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Selection

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The selection of a jury is the process that occurs right before the actual trial, and after the trial initiation and the arraignment and plea. Only about 10 percent of actual arraignments see an actual trial, because 90 percent of cases that are preparing for trial end up accepting a plea bargain (Schmalleher, 2009).…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Selection

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury selection are various methods used to decide who will be on the jury. The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been empanaled.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many say that the trial by jury is one of our sacred cows – meaning something that people don’t like to criticize- but many state that if we’d long had trial by judge in criminal cases and were to suggest that his reasoned and professional judgment as to facts and inferences should be replaced by the blanket verdict of pretty well any twelve men and women cramped together for a period of time the one would rightfully find this unjust. The role of the jury service is to encourage self-governance and civil participation, the ones who benefit from the jury service are ordinary citizens. What is important about the jury system is that it ensures the people ultimate control in the legislative and executive branch. Citizens can participate in the legislative and executive branches by exercising their right to vote, the only way that they can participate in the judicial branch of government is because the jury service has special role. The jury system allows ordinary citizens to participate in a government judicial process. They have the ultimate control in the legislative and executive branches.…

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unless a defendant waives the Fifth Amendment right to a grand jury indictment, in a federal prosecution the prosecutor must initiate a serious criminal case through a grand jury indictment. Federal grand juries consist of between sixteen and twenty-three grand jurors with a foreperson appointed by the court to overseeing the grand jury. For an indictment at least twelve grand jurors must vote to indict, or not indictment can be issued. A federal prosecutor presents witnesses in front of the grand jury and asks questions of the…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, we are given the right to a jury trial, one of the most important freedoms that out judicial system has to offer us. A jury consists of anywhere between 6 and 12 registered voters who determine whether a person is guilty or innocent in the act of crime that they are being accused of. Not only do they possess this power in a trial, but they may also judge the laws themselves and whether or not is perhaps unconstitutional, unfair, or cumbersome, in which case they can declare the defendant, the person accused of the crime, not-guilty. Their responsibility is heavy and their power enormous in the outcome of a trial. It is a way of distributing the power so that not just one person has total power, and also allowing society to be involved with their government because the jury acts as the conscience of our society.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judge chooses who will serve on the jury and will consider the recommendation of the jury in a bench trial.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grand jury paper

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Grand Jury determines whether there is enough evidence for the trial. Grand juries carry out this duty by examining evidence presented to them by the prosecution, and issuing indictments, or by investigating alleged crimes and issuing, presentments. A grand jury is traditionally larger and more distinguishable from a petit jury, which is used during trial. Both of these are good for both parties because it gives a chance for both parties to see what evidence and figure out how the state is going to proceed. The DA must only present enough evidence to convince a judge that he has enough evidence to go to court. The Defense may not know if the DA has much more damning evidence in the future, so it can be unknown to the Defense and be a guessing game. It offers a chance for a judge or jury to decide if the case merits going to trial, and if it doen't then the defendant is released. But if there is very good evidence, and the Defense realizes that they…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition of Evidence

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jury members have an obligation to resolve the conflicts that exist in the evidence and determine the truth based on the facts that both parties have presented in the courtroom. Juries are responsible for determining if the amount of evidence presented is sufficient to find someone guilty or not of the accused crime.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of a jury is the traditional method within the common law for deciding the facts in any dispute between parties. The role of a jury is to determine question of fact. The jury is in a powerful method because ultimately, it determines whether a person is guilty or innocent. In civil cases, the main function of the jury is to find the facts having regard to the evidence, and assess damages. The number of jurors used in a civil trial is less than that used in a criminal trial. Another important difference is that the verdict does not have to be unanimous, meaning that a judge will accept a majority decision of a civil jury.…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The judge tells them that if they have reasonable doubt, they must declare the defendant not guilty. All twelve must vote unanimously; otherwise, there will be no verdict, and the result will be a hung jury, which means there would be another trial.…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The jury system has been used in the criminal trial since the Constitution stated “the trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury.” The jury system has since been used in Australian courts with the aim of effectively achieving justice in the criminal trial by allowing peers to judge the accused. The jury system is effective in upholding the rights of the defendant and society. Recent reforms have also led to a more time and cost-effective way of using a jury as the third party in the adversary system. The Jury Act 1977(NSW) states “in any criminal proceedings in the Supreme Court or the District Court that are to be tried by jury, the jury is to consist of 12 persons.” The jury system that was formalised by the act has created an effective means of achieving justice in the criminal trial process. 12 persons randomly selected from society represent the communities’ standards and values as well as bringing a diversity of life experience to the judgment. By using people from society, the jury system effectively upholds society’s right to keep a check on the on-goings of court and prevents the legal system becoming distinct from society – this in turn, increases the public confidence with the criminal trial process. Also, the responsibility of the judgment of guilty or not guilty is made by twelve of the accused peers instead of one, reducing the impact of…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    grand jury

    • 1530 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The grand jury plays an important role in the criminal process, but not one that involves a finding of guilt or punishment of a party. Instead, a prosecutor will work with a grand jury to decide whether to bring criminal charges or an indictment against a potential defendant -- usually reserved for serious felonies. Grand jury members may be called for jury duty for months at a time, but need only appear in court for a few days out of every month. Regular court trial juries are usually 6 or 12 people, but in the federal system, a grand jury can be 16 to 23 people. The grand jury is one of the first procedures in a criminal trial. Courts often use preliminary hearings prior to criminal trials, instead of grand juries, which are adversarial in nature. As with grand juries, preliminary hearings are meant to determine whether there is enough evidence, or probable cause, to indict a criminal suspect. Unlike a grand jury, a preliminary hearing is usually open to the public and involves lawyers and a judge (not so with grand juries, other than the prosecutor). Sometimes, a preliminary hearing proceeds a grand jury. One of the biggest differences between the two is the requirement that a defendant request a preliminary hearing, although the court may decline a request.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the trial, both the prosecutor and the defense attorney will present evidence and testimony. The jury containing 12 members of society chosen to reach a verdict will listen to and evaluate evidence and testimony to determine an outcome. When the trial takes place, the courtroom is generally open to any citizen wishing to visit. Friends, family and members of the press cannot be barred from a courtroom trial.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fifth Amendment Clauses

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Profoundly established in the Anglo-American custom, the grand jury initially served to secure the denounced from excessively enthusiastic indictments by the English government. Congressional statutes diagram the methods by which a grand jury should impanel. Commonly, the grand attendants are chosen from the pool of prospective members of the jury who possibly could serve on a given day in any hearer limit. at normal law, a grand jury comprises of between 12 and 23 parts. Since the grand jury was determined from the regular law, courts employ the basic law as a method for deciphering the grand jury clause. While state councils may set the statutory number of grand legal hearers anywhere inside the basic law prerequisite of 12 to 23, statutes setting the number outside of this reach damage the Fifth Amendment. Elected law has set the elected grand jury number as falling between 16 and 23.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics