Product Innovation Best Practices Series
DEVELOPING A PRODUCT INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY FOR YOUR BUSINESS
Reference Paper #39
By Dr. Robert G. Cooper and Dr. Scott J. Edgett
Stage-Gate International and Product Development Institute
For information call +1-905-304-8797
This article first appeared in Research Technology Management May-June 2010, Vol53, No3, pgs. 33-40
Stage-Gate is a registered trademark. Logo for Product Development Institute Inc. used under license by Stage-Gate International. Logo for Stage-Gate used under license where appropriate.
© 2000-201 Product Development Institute Inc.
DEVELOPING A PRODUCT INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY FOR YOUR BUSINESS A framework for developing a product innovation strategy includes deﬁning innovation goals and objectives, selecting strategic arenas, developing a strategic map, and allocating resources.
Robert G. Cooper and Scott J. Edgett
OVERVIEW: Many companies lack a clearly articulated and well-communicated product innovation and technology strategy. Such a strategy is essential and is strongly linked to positive performance in product innovation. A framework for developing a product innovation strategy is presented, and the various steps of strategy development are described, from best-practice ways to deﬁne innovation goals and objectives through to the selection of strategic arenas and the development of the strategic map. Deﬁning attack plans and entry strategies are also described. Finally, methods for resource allocation and deployment using strategic buckets and strategic roadmaps are outlined. KEY CONCEPTS: innovation strategy, product development strategy, strategic arenas, strategic buckets, roadmaps, entry strategies In the late 1990s, two large ﬁrms were growing by leaps and bounds, driven by the boom in ﬁber-optic communications. They were Corning Glass, which manufactured ﬁber-optic cable, and Nortel Networks, which produced the boxes at each end of the cable to convert the light signal into an electronic signal. Then came the crash of 2000; overnight, both ﬁrms’ sales plummeted, and their share prices plunged from over $100 to about $1. Dr. Robert G. Cooper is Emeritus Professor, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; ISBM Distinguished Research Scholar at Penn State’s Smeal College of Business Administration; and President of the Product Development Institute. Cooper is an acknowledged global expert in the ﬁeld of innovation management, a Fellow of the PDMA, and creator of the Stage-Gate® new-product process used by many ﬁrms to drive new products to market. He is a proliﬁc researcher and publisher in the ﬁeld of innovation management, with over 100 articles and six books. firstname.lastname@example.org; www.stage-gate.com May—June 2010
0895-6308/10/$5.00 © 2010 Industrial Research Institute, Inc.
Ten years later, Corning is thriving, whereas Nortel is in Chapter 11 and being broken up. Why? How did two great and innovative companies, facing the same crisis, end up so differently a short decade later? One reason for Nortel’s demise is that the company lacked direction and an innovation strategy after the crash; instead, it limped along from one ad hoc decision to the next. By contrast, Corning’s senior management took charge, developed a strong product innovation and technology strategy for the ﬁrm, and provided leadership and direction to see that strategy through (1). Corning’s management took a hard look at the company’s previous 100 years of successes in innovation and what drove them. They concluded that the “repeatable keys” to success—the elements in Corning’s culture and history that they could draw on to face this new challenge—were a leadership commitment, a clear understanding of the company’s capabilities, a strong connection to the customer and a deep understanding of major customer problems, and a willingness to take big but...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document