Preview

Deterrence Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deterrence Theory
Deterrence theory is a form of social control that is used to instill fear as a preventative measure to crime. This theory often makes an offender do a cost/benefits analysis prior to committing the crime: is doing this crime worth the time? An offender is “put on notice” that if they are caught there are certain things that society and the constitution mandates will happen as a result of non-conformity. I believe Deterrence can work, my issue is the varying degrees of non-conformity and the varying degrees of punishment are not the same across the board. An example of conformity/non-conformity is individual state gun laws. In the state of Louisiana, you are able to carry a loaded gun in your vehicle as long as it is in plain, open view. Once you cross the state line into Texas, the law changes, you cannot have a loaded weapon in your vehicle and the ammunition cannot be in the same space as the firearm. Unknowingly, many travelers become non-conformists as they travel from state to state. The laws were made to deter specific acts, however, many are ignorant of these laws, and they are the same laws that were made to protect them from events such as the Luby‘s Massacre in 1991. Often judges say “ignorance of the law is not an excuse,” but because we don’t live in that specific state or county and we don’t plan on moving or being there we often times don’t care what the law is because we feel it doesn’t apply to us and that is where the Deterrence theory fails. How can you deter a criminal act if the citizens aren’t aware that it is a criminal act.

The primary goal of deterrence is to discourage members of society from committing criminal acts out of fear of punishment and we have used this theory and had some success with it over time. Applying it as a singular theory could work better if there were more uniformity of laws across cities, counties, and states. It is hard to ban a substance in one city and in the one next to it, it is not banned or considered

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Making an individual afraid to commit the crime again by threat of the same punishment or a harsher punishment.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crime theories can vary greatly. A lot of people think that poverty or social status is a major factor on criminal behavior. Others believe that is embedded in human beings to be born with evil therefore we are attracted to crime. Bottom line is deterrence cannot be achieved unless the underlining cause for criminal behavior is found.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment Research Paper

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By definition, deterrence can mean society’s way of preventing criminal behavior through the act of punishing. Deterrence was noticed by the eighth century. At that time society thought that if anyone was able to think then they would not commit a single crime due to the fact that the punishment would overcome the benefit of the crime committed. With that in mind citizens wouldn’t even think about committing a crime because of the outcome of the punishment. Deterrence was put into place to drop the rise of the death penalty by scaring citizens from doing any crime at all. Today the rate of crime is still on a rise so there are some people that feel this type of punishment isn’t very effective. If criminals were at all afraid of the punishment…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    You have the specific deterrence which is should reduce repeat offenses. Then you have general deterrence is a goal of criminal sentencing who have not been arrested yet, this is an attempt to turn crime.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Parkinson, R. D. (2002). Specific Deterrence. Retrieved from Online Dictionary of the Social Science: http://bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl?term=SPECIFIC%20DETERRENCE…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The specific aims and purposes of criminal law is to punish criminals, and prevent people from becoming future criminals by using deterrence. “Having a criminal justice system that imposes liability and punishment for violations deter.” (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). Criminal law intimidates citizens because most people won’t want to be arrested or have a write up on their personal record. Criminal law controls behaviour but only outlines what a good citizen should be doing, by creating laws. “More precisely, the term refers to substantive criminal law - a body of law that prohibits certain kinds of conduct and imposes sanctions for unlawful behaviour.” (The Canadian Encyclopedia, Criminal Law, http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/criminal-law, para. 1.) Having laws and not enforcing them is pointless, so by creating a law you need to enforce it strictly so people stop committing the offence. Like in Alberta and other parts of Canada the Distracted Driving law was in full effect and anyone caught texting and driving or anything along those lines was given a major demerit dock, and a hefty ticket you need to pay. By doing this it enforces the law and creates that thought in the back of the citizens head that says “should I do that? What will happen if I text and drive and get caught?”. However, most criminals don’t have that subconscious thought and don’t care if they get caught breaking the law, that’s why so many criminals are re-offenders. Laws are either…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas and the Death Penalty

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Gibbs, J. (1975). Deterrence, Types of Deterrence, and Crime Rates. In Crime, Punishment and Deterrence (pp. 29-56). New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Inc.…

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Deterrence focuses on the possible future actions of an individual instead of present criminal behavior. Deterrence is a goal that is used to avoid impending crimes from occurring. It is believed that if punishments are rendered, it would prevent that individual from committing future crimes and it would deter others from engaging in illegal behavior. When the person who committed the crime…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deterrence is the first punishment philosophy. Deterrence is the philosophy that if fear of punishment for committing crimes is present, then crimes are less likely to be committed. Deterrence in today's society is more for police and their presence in the community to prevent or slow down crime. The idea of deterrence also can be helped through punishment of crimes to be carried out swiftly and being a punishment that will make others think twice before committing the same crime. With the philosophy of deterrence, people are going to be less likely to commit a crime if they are more than likely going to be caught committing the crime, and they will be punished for committing the crime. The adult court systems rely on deterrence to come from punishments people found guilty are sentenced to. Punishments should fit the crime and when punishments are severe, most people will reconsider committing the same crime in fear that incarceration will result. Juvenile courts use the threat of punishment as a deterrent for minors that commit crimes.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Barlow, general deterrence is the idea that, "people refrain from crime because they fear the punishment that others have received" (2000). This means that one might be deterred from committing a crime if he or she knows it carries a harsh punishment. This points out that many criminals do not take the time to consider punishment. Many of them do not believe they will be the one to get caught. Also, general deterrence…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before I proceed, I think it best to delve further into to the basics of criminal Deterrence, and what it is. Deterrence is based on the concept that if the consequence of committing a crime outweighs the benefits of the crime, then the perpetrator will be deterred from committing said crime. This is all in the idea that as humans we all know the difference between right and wrong and that with criminal behavior, a penalty is bound to follow, when an individual acts, they’re doing so out of free will and they know what they’re doing, be it right or wrong. Ironically the deterrence model is flawed to an extent with it’s thinking; criminals are rational, a murderer may be a murderer for the same reasons I choose to work as a salesman for the time being: because the profession makes him better off than anything else available to them. The model fails to realise that murderers, or anyone who commits crime for that matter, are constantly outweighing the benefits and repercussions of any actions they may commit, not thinking of what may be a rational and sound decision to others.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deterrence is a theory based on fear of consequences (MOJ 3.2, 1998). General deterrence is the belief that a harsh penalty for a particular crime will dissuade others in society from committing that crime. Specific deterrence is the belief that imposing a harsh sentence upon a particular individual will discourage him/her from every offending again.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Focused Deterrence Theory

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unlike the focused deterrence theory, the “regular” deterrence has a broader target rather than just drugs and gangs. Deterrence deters people from committing all types of crimes and is targeted to gain retribution of offenders committing crimes. The way it does punishment isn’t like the focused deterrence theory pulling all the legal levers and giving the biggest punishment, the way that plain deterrence works is matching the level of punishment to the level of crime committed.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deterrence Case Study

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maxine Charles,24, was accused of a crime and sentenced to 16 months for stealing a truck, oblivious to an infant who was inside at the time. The truck was stopped moments after due to an eye witness. Before the truck was stolen it was left running while the owner of the vehicle went into a business, leaving a baby in the back seat. Although, the infant was not harmed and returned back to the parents, Charles, the Saskatchewan women, was prohibited from driving for a year, she was also told she could not consume alcohol for 9 months due to alcohol being an addiction that filled a void which was caused by her recent “toxic relationship”. The substances drove Charles to steal the truck. The judge, Steven Schiefer, “ordered her to pay $800 victim surcharge and undergo treatment for her addiction”.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays