Determinism and Moral Responsibility
Does it make sense to impose the death penalty? Reinstatement of the death penalty is a famous topic that has been argued across nations for many years. There is no right or wrong decision of whether or not to reinstate the death penalty because there are strong beliefs and opinions supporting either side. Even though there are strong beliefs and opinions supporting both sides, I still believe that death penalty should be imposed. The reason is that I believe everybody is responsible for their own actions and the person that committed a crime must be severely punished. I am also a believer of the current justice system. When our justice system found a person is guilty, there will be good amounts evidence that supports the finding. Therefore, when our justice system found a person is guilty, it is not likely that the person is innocent. One of the major beliefs in philosophy that support the reinstatement of death penalty is Moral Responsibility. In contrast, one of the major beliefs that do not support the reinstatement of death penalty is Determinism. According to Wikipedia, Moral Responsibility is the “status of morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission, in accordance with one’s moral obligations.” In other words, Moral Responsibility is a belief in philosophy that indicates a person should get the corresponding reward, punishment, praise, or blame in connection to person’s right or wrong action. Of course, in Moral Responsibility, the person should get praise or reward when the person did something good and the person should get blame or punishment when the person did something bad or omission of doing something good (“Moral Responsibility”). For instance, a person did not serve his or her Moral Responsibility if the person runs away instead of trying to save a child inside the burning car or calling the police for help after witnessing a huge car accident. Omission of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document