Preview

Descartes Dualism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Dualism
Cartesian dualism is a system of beliefs used to explain the nature of our existence and reality. However, there are many problems with dualism, the most significant being the mind/body interaction issue which was raised by Elizabeth in her correspondence to Descartes. My essay will firstly expound the key principles of Cartesian dualism. Then, I will analyse the problems that Elizabeth raises for dualism and critically evaluate its counter arguments. Ultimately, I have concluded that Elizabeth presents a strong argument against Cartesian dualism.

The foundation of Cartesian dualism is that there are two different types of substances: physical and mental.1 Physical substances have the fundamental property of extension while mental substances have the fundamental property of thought. Furthermore, they are entirely distinct from each other; a physical substance cannot think and a mental substance cannot have extension.2

Another key principle of Cartesian dualism is that humans have a body, in the physical state, and a mind, in the mental state, which interact with each other.3 Descartes compared this union of mind and body to a sailor and his ship in Meditation 6; like how a sailor steers his ship, we too have a thinking thing, existing independently of the body, which controls our body.4 Thus our mind can affect our bodies. Furthermore, Descartes reasoned that our bodies can affect our mind because when our bodies are damaged, our mind perceives this as pain.

However, this raises the issue of mind/body interaction; it seems impossible for a mental substance, with no physical properties, and a material object to affect each other.5

1

Binder, MD, Hirokawa, N & Windhorst, U 2009, Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin.
2

Lloyd, M 2013, Week 3 Descartes I, PowerPoint slides, University of Queensland, Brisbane.

3

McLeod, S 2007, Mind Body Debate, viewed 13th April 2013, .
4

Temple, C 2002, Meditations on First



Bibliography: Binder, MD, Hirokawa, N & Windhorst, U 2009, Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin. Bloom, P 2007, Lecture 2 Foundations: This is Your Brain, Transcript, Yale University, Connecticut. Calef, S 2005, Dualism and Mind, Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, viewed 12th April 2013, . Koksvik, O 2006, In Defense of Interactionism, Monash University, Melbourne, viewed 11th April 2013, . Lisa Shapiro (ed.) The Correspondence Between Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia and Rene Descartes, (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2007) 61-67. Lloyd, M 2013, Week 3 Descartes I, PowerPoint slides, University of Queensland, Brisbane. Lloyd, M 2013, Week 4 Descartes II, PowerPoint slides, University of Queensland, Brisbane. McLeod, S 2007, Mind Body Debate, viewed 13th April 2013, . Rene Descartes, The Passions of the Soul, trans. John Conttingham, Robert Stoothoff & Dougald Murdoch (Cambridge: CUP, 1985), 340. Temple, C 2002, Meditations on First Philosophy, Philosophy Index, viewed 14th April 2013, .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The mind and body problem can be divided into many different questions. We can consider or ask by ourselves that what is the mind? What is the body? And do both of them are co-existing, or does the mind only exist in the body? Or does the body only exist in the mind? Otherwise, we also will consider that if both the mind and body exist, and then there could be a number of types of relationships. Maybe the mind will affect our body. Or maybe the body will affect our mind, or maybe the mind and body will both affect each other.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes argues the mind is seperate from the physical body. With advances in nueroscience and the contious brain injuries gives strong evidence in supporting materialism. Defining what Cartesian dualists mean by the brain, mind, body and soul, an argument by Cartesians dualists may be reached. Responding to evidence confronting brain injuries from claims that the brain is only ‘an instrument of the soul’. Concluding there is a simultaneous support for materialism resulting from neuroscience and the Cartesian dualism argument, may be wrong.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PSYCH 102 Chapter Outline

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages

    René Descartes (1596–1650) was a dualist and proposed that mind and body interact at the pineal gland. He hypothesized that the cerebrospinal fluid of the brain’s cavities contained spirits which flowed from the brain through the nerves to the muscles, provoking movement.…

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes was a brilliant thinker, philosopher, scientist, physiologist, and early psychologist whose theory of mind-body connection has become an integral part of modern medicine (Goodwin, 2008). His dualist view, asserted the mind was ethereal and autonomous in relation to the physical and strictly material body, and to account for their interaction, he proposed the pineal gland was where the intersection of the two transpired (Goodwin, 2008). He theorized the mechanistic, reflexive nature of certain human behaviors, although his one caveat was that reasoning and thoughts were unique properties of the human soul (Wickens, 2005). Descartes 's work laid some of the fundamental parameters for modern thought in psychology, encouraged further research on the localization of brain function, and promoted further experimental research of the nervous system (Goodwin, 2008).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes concludes that we are distinct from our body, and can exist without it. Seen from a modern materialist’s perspective, Descartes’ view is quite obviously wrong. However, assuming no knowledge of modern science, we should still be able to disprove his conclusion by looking for flaws in his reasoning in the text. In this essay, I will examine three relevant arguments Descartes presents in his sixth meditation and point out their flaws respectively.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hartfield, G., (2002). Philosophy Guidebook to Descartes and The meditation. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook. New york, NY: Routledge.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that one can understand the mind to exist separately from the body. The middle term of the argument, as noted in the major premise is the separate understanding of two things, and he presents the idea of mind and body as the minor term. Descartes devotes a larger share of the argument to defending the minor premise, perhaps because the idea of body and mind as separate substances is more controversial than a general notion of separate substances as distinct. He goes on to expound not only the idea that the mind and body are separate, but that the essence of the human being lies in its nature as a thinking thing. As thought is the essence of the human being, and the principle attribute of the mind is thought, the mind can therefore be seen as more fundamental to humans than the body. Descartes acknowledges that it is likely for a body to be joined to the mind, however he maintains that one can still conceive of both body and mind as separate substances. And as the essence of the body is extension rather than thought, it is fundamentally less relevant to a thinking…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The mind, or ‘soul’ as it has come to be known to some, is classified as a ‘non-physical entity’ that is separate from the brain by Cartesian Dualists and linked to (but still different from) the brain by Property Dualists. These are perfectly reasonable ways to look at it as such concepts as qualia and privileged access and the fact that mental phenomena lack spatial features support these theories. While Materialists may doggedly reject Dualism, it can be noted that some of their arguments are by no means iron-clad, including their trump card, the ‘interaction problem’. Also, Materialistic arguments fail to address and explain our mental experiences taking…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mind-Body problem asks the question about the relationship between the mind and the body. We, as creatures have a brain, with several types of tissue and neurons and have we a mind because we have the ability to have emotions, sensations, beliefs and desires. The issue arises as we consider the brain as a physical object, but do we consider the mind as a physical entity too, and if the mind is a physical entity are our emotions, desires and sensations a product of our brain? Some argue that the mind is just like the brain and therefore it is a physical object. Some argue otherwise. Rene Descartes offered a solution for the Mind-Body problem, which he termed as Cartesian Dualism. According to Dualism, “brains and the bodies in which they are found are physical things; the mind, which is a non-physical…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Substance Dualism

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order to truly understand Descartes’ argument of substance dualism, it is important to understand the methodological, reductionist approach that he employs to build his theory. In the First Meditation, Descartes sets the basis for his ontological search for truth by rejecting all of his previous beliefs, experiences, and memories in order to begin from a clean, uninfluenced position. He says, “I have no senses. Body, shape, extension,…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes suggests the viewpoint that the human body and the human mind are two completely different things with different functions. The viewpoint is called Dualism, and holds that both the physical world and the immaterial world exist. Dualism is based on two substances, which are mind and matter. Descartes explained that these two does not necessarily need one another to exist.…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Substance dualism is often called ‘Cartesian dualism" ‎and is the assumption that mind and body are really distinct substances. Rene Descartes (1596 – 1650) was the first early modern philosopher to hold that a thinking-thing is entirely different form an extended thing and mind can exist without the body. Cartesian dualism, which started the famous mind-body problem of causal interaction, has been criticised by many, one of whom was a primary adherent, Baruch Spinoza (632-1677). This essay aims to explain and assess Spinoza’s criticism of Descartes substance dualism and see what Spinoza offers instead. I will begin by summarizing the views of Descartes on substance and distinctiveness of mind and body and how they interact. Then I will discuss Spinoza’s objections to Descartes views in general but give more details about the ones I believe are more important. I will finish by concluding what Spinoza actually wants out of it and what he really achieves.…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    She already knows that the body and the movement cannot happen without impulsion from another physical body. Therefore, Descartes’ answer is there are three concepts that she needs to understand it, the concept of the body, the concept of the mind and the connection between the mind and the body. He defines the association between the body and the mind by saying, “the force of the soul for moving the body, and of the body for acting upon the soul by causing its feeling and passion.”2 He means that the body’s effect on the soul by controls the emotions, and the soul controls the body movement. He tells Elisabeth that she needs to understand the concepts that the body is material, and the mind is immaterial. He tries to give Elisabeth example by using the physical concepts of the weight.3 He said that the weight is not separate from the body. However, Elisabeth did not satisfy with his answer and asked Descartes for more clarification of immaterial soul and its action with the body. He answers that he need to clarify more on the concepts he mentioned it in his first letter (the body, the soul, and the connection between them).…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays