Preview

Descartes 4th Meditation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes 4th Meditation
After Descartes goes over what he has previously covered, including his proving that God exists and that God is perfect, he begins his fourth meditation. In this meditation, titled Truth and falsity, Descartes contemplates how he, Descartes makes mistakes if he is a product of this perfect being. First, he knows that God would not deceive him, since the will to deceive is a sign of weakness or hatred, and God's perfection would not allow it. Second, if God created him, God is responsible for his judgment, and so his sense of judgment must be flawless as long as he uses it correctly. The question at hand is, why does Descartes make mistakes if he is the product of God, who is a perfect being. In Descartes fourth meditation he gives some plausible reasons on why we are not perfect beings like our creator. One thought that Descartes gives is free will. Descartes explains that our will tends to come into play before we think things over. Due to this fact, we often pass judgment on things before we clearly know the right answer and also because of indifference. Along with free will comes the problem of arrogance. Free will allows us to make our own choices; therefore we think that we know best. Usually the choices we make only benefit ourselves because we are altruistic beings. This in itself makes us imperfect beings. God does not only think about Himself, if that was the case, there would not even be a population. By thinking only about ourselves, we are pulling ourselves further away from the perfection of our Creator by making ourselves less like him.

Furthermore, the next question that arises is, does God even exist? During Descartes first meditation, titled What can be called into doubt, he discusses the Dream Argument. In the Dream Argument Descartes explains that he can doubt what he sees. Therefore, if we can not see God, how can we prove His existence? This proposition beings skepticism in to play. Skepticism is the thesis that knowledge is not



Cited: 1. Feinberg, Joel, and Shafer-Laundau, Russ. Reason and Responsibility. 12th. Belmont, CA, USA: Thomson and Wadsworth, 2005.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. Why is it important to Descartes to determine as early as possible whether God exists and is a deceiver?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To begin with, Descartes asserts that because (P1) “I know that everything which I clearly and distinctly understand is capable of being created by God so as to correspond exactly with my understanding of it” (p. 16), and…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes conclusion on premise 6 about God’s existence argues that the clear and distinct perceptions provide the foundation or basis for the truth of our beliefs and that is so because God, who is not a deceiver would not allow Descartes to be mistaken about that which he clearlyl and distinctly perceives. His notion of clear and distinct perceptions and their truth requires God’s existence.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He then makes a claim that states effects aren’t ever realer than their causes, which means something ‘perfect’ must exist to be able to have the idea of ‘perfection’. Descartes goes on to say that he knows he isn’t ‘perfect’ and since he isn’t ‘perfect’, who could have put this idea in his head? His answer is something ‘perfect’, and that something ‘perfect’ must be…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes sets out on a mission to guarantee that every one of his beliefs is certain without any doubt. He considers that he should free himself of all false learning keeping in mind the end goal is to acquire any genuine information. Descartes chooses to question all that he has learned from truth in the past. He will depend on his thinking capacity to reconstruct his own particular knowledge, starting with a foundation of things which he is most sure about. Descartes declines to acknowledge anything that has any hint of doubt. His purpose behind doing such is because he genuinely trusts this is the best way to find the practical presence of something that cannot be questioned. Descartes uses a strategy in his endeavor to obtain information.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum 112

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rene Descartes in his Discourse of the Method begins with the problem of showing and proving his own existence, but later in the reading changes the problem and it is concentrating on proving the existence of God. The first time that I thought to myself that this reading is probably about something else than proving his own existence was where the author started talking about perfection. The author defined God as “something that truly was more perfect than I was, something indeed having perfections of which I could have any idea” (Descartes, 2010, p.16).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes is trying to find where his thoughts of God are coming from. He knows they couldn’t come from himself because for one he doubts, he has desires and he lacks stuff. Now, he is calling into question whether they are from his parents, but there is a problem with that interpretation too because, then the question of where his parents got it from would be arise and it would be going back like a chain all the way to his ancestors or who knows. Considering the fact that he is a thinking thing, he also argue that the thought of God cannot be…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes also states that this argument isn’t strong enough to prove that God exists. Because he has been constantly revising his believes he says that at this point he can easily tell the difference between essence and existence. After he points that out he explains that he believes that God could be separated from the existence but not from his essence. Then he contradicts himself saying that not existing would be prove of him not being perfect thus he had to exist. After that Descartes starts lacking of confidence that God exists. He thinks that he is giving some attributions, being perfect; to a creature that he doesn’t even know if exists. He thinks that he is just matching two things that he knows to make something new, something that…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Meditations, Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information, however, his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately, Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by the Evil Demon doubt.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He starts with the idea of a God who is eternal, infinite, and perfect. In the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, He explains that “we must believe that there is a God, because we are so taught in the Holy Scriptures, and, on the other hand, that we must believe the Holy Scriptures because they come from God “(Descartes 1). He then doubts himself if god does really exist. Through examining his thoughts, he ends up believing that the idea of God exists because of his innate idea of God which has to be God who “is the cause of this idea”(Descartes 25). Descartes then explains more in depth saying, “I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing is and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists” (34). Another reason is how in his further mediations, he explains how if God does not exist, then he is not a supremely perfect being. Saying that God does not exist, we can imagine a being that is more perfect than God. But this is a contradiction because since the idea of God is the idea of the most perfect being of all. Therefore, God must exist because you cannot image a more perfect being than god, who he is the almighty and perfect of…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Beliefs

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most important part of Descartes’ knowledge was that he understood that God should not be to blame for the mistakes that we make in our lives. According to Descartes’, God has a plan for us, but he gave us freewill so that we have the ability to do whatever it is that we want to do. However, this can be a disadvantage to us at times because, unlike God, we don’t understand everything and make mistakes. Descartes knows that God would not deceive him, because Descartes defines that will to deceive as a sign of weakness, and God’s perfection would not allow him to be weak or act maliciously towards another. He also believes that if God created him, then God is responsible for him, which means that Descartes’ judgment would be perfect if only he used it correctly.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the beginning of the third meditation, Descartes seeks to establish the existence of God using his initial concept of self awareness. Descartes argued that because he thought, then he lived. Thinking ability at this time was linked to being alive and thought that there must be a god who puts the thoughts in his mind. In his quest for indubitable truth, Descartes came up with the theory of ideas, which classified those things that he considered distinct and clear to be true. Descartes argued that the idea of god should be coming from within him since he cannot experience god himself directly or find any perfection in himself.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Exam 2

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Earnestly, Descartes ponders over the course of Meditation IV how an all-powerful and seemingly benevolent God could allow man to believe errors and falsehoods. In Meditation IV, Descartes compared God to a master craftsman, so wouldn’t it seem that his craft would be without mistake. Undoubtedly, Descartes is befuddled by the concept of sometimes believing in falsehoods although he was created by an infinitely perfect being, isn’t believing in falsehoods supposed to be a bad thing? If that is the case then who is to blame? However, Descartes perceives that it would be impossible for God to deceive him and would neither desire too because God is simply perfect in all ways. God had given a faculty that would not lead man to error as long as it was used correctly, thus it is the fault of man for believing in falsehoods. In my notes, the understanding is summarized as when one chooses to believe a claim that does not have sufficient evidence then one is to blame for rushing to judgment. In a perfect world, it would seem that man should never fall to error because of the faculty given by God, but continuously we give rise to an infinitude of imperfections. Descartes further presses on to understand why God allows falsehoods or flaws innately within man that lead to error; he attributes it to two things: faculty of understanding and faculty of free will. Because we can choose to question, seek answers, believe in what we want to believe, that is the reason for error. Descartes says that he does not question the mysterious ways of God, although he does seem to ponder his actions for these faculties alone testify to the tenacious and insatiable curiosity of man. At the end of Meditation IV, Descartes comes into an understanding about his perceptions since he had discovered the source of falsity and error that for as long as he is diligent of will and restraint within the bounds of his own knowledge, he will never be deceived. I do…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays