Preview

Democratic Features of Uk

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
333 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democratic Features of Uk
Democracy in the UK has many features, each one having positives and negatives points. The first feature is democratic elections. Elections in the UK are democratic to the point they are based on universal suffrage, free and fair, provide electoral choice these are the advantages of Democratic Elections. Disadvantages are that there might not be a good selection to choose from, choices are very limited. If the people are not happy with the result then they can re open nominations (RON), this process also has both advantages and disadvantages, this gives people a chance to once again try and change something that they are not happy with however it does cost the government a lot to have people re vote. The UK is a parliamentary government. This is the main institution that links the government and the people. Parliament ensures representative because the dominant chamber of parliament, the House of Commons is elected. It also maintains deliberative democracy; this is when the public interest is decided through argument, debate and discussion. Additionally Parliament ensures responsible government. In contrast The House of Lords is completely unelected as a result this weakens the representative role of Parliament. Party system prevents MPs from using their own judgement due to discipline. It also restricts freedom of debate and voting in the House of Commons.
Another feature of the Democracy in the UK is pressure groups, this gives a political voice to minorities an example of a pressure group is POWER 2010. It also provides a way in which citizens can apply influence between elections. Lastly it gets people more politically involved rather than just voting. Disadvantages of pressure groups are that it may concentrate political power rather than distributing it more extensively. Also financially powerful pressure groups may be able to “buy” influence through political parties. Furthermore pressure groups undermine the representative process. This weakens the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Firstly, Britain, amongst many other countries, claims to be a democracy. This would suggest that UK citizens, have effective influence over government, and over decisions that affect them. However, there has been much controversy over this claim, some arguing that power lies in the hands of just a few, and others standing by the allegation that power in the UK is widely distributed.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (c) Is pressure group politics in the UK better described as pluralist or as elitist?…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To what extent does democracy in the UK suffer from a participation crisis? (25 marks)…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second way in which the UK democracy participation can be strengthened is making voting compulsory. Compulsory voting is very self-explanatory and basically means that the government will enforce voting upon those eligible and will only accept the vote if the turnout is 90%+. The main advantage of making voting compulsory is that there would obviously be greater participation and interest in politics. The more people that vote the better because then everyone would have had their say in what way the country should be ran and it will create a fairer result. Also an interest in politics would develop as people would want to know what they were voting for.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are considerations that pressure groups strengthen pluralist democracy. An argument for this encompasses that the existence of varied numerous pressure groups support the theory of pluralism. The modern political culture in the UK can be referred to as being one of pluralism in nature. This means that we expect a wide range of groups, interests, beliefs and ideologies to flourish together, all competing for attention and influence. The UK is a fundamentally free society, tolerant of different cultures, ideas and demands. As long as a group does not break the law, threaten the security of the state or incite others to commit crime or adopt racist ideas, it will be tolerated and protected from discrimination. Thus, pressure groups are able to operate in an extremely free and tolerant environment. In short, they are a key element in a pluralist society.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the time period, 1850, Britain was not democratic. There was not a lot of choice concerning the political parties, there were only two parties: The Liberals and the Conservatives. Woman did not have any right to vote and were considered second class citizens. In England and Wales only one million and five men could vote and some men could vote twice. The distribution of seats did not take into account the migration of Britain. The House of Lords (HOL) were aristocracy that were their because of their ancestry. MP’s were unpaid and had to own property so the poorer classes could not be MP’s and therefore opinions not heard. A democracy is one which has universal suffrage, equal distribution of seats, wide range of choice of parties that cover a wide range of issues, everyone has the right to be an MP and the HOL should be trusted members of the public. By the end of the time period, 1918, the majority of these had been overcome, lots of people had the right to vote, redistribution of seats made it more equal, there were now more than two parties, the property qualification in becoming an MP was abolished and they were paid salaries and the HOL lost the right to veto laws and hold them for two years, they could only hold them for one year.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most telling indicator of there being a democratic deficit in the UK today is the continuing decline of voter turnout at all elections for the past 60 years. There is a growing level of general apathy towards political issues in the UK which is not just damaging to the health of a democracy but fatal. The government requires a mandate to govern, if they do not achieve popular consent then how are they representative of the people?…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an argument that the government has the power and right to change laws and represent people without necessarily having to be elected. This can also be known as ‘Democratic deficit’. An example of democratic deficit is the House of Lords. The members in the House of Lords aren’t elected but they get to make laws and represent the people. The members in House of Lords are usually given their seats hereditarily so many people found it unfair that they’re not elected into the Parliament but they can make decisions and laws on our behalf.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the moment we have a mixed use of democratic systems in the UK, however we are mainly based on a representative democracy, and a participatory democracy. This is because like a representative democracy, we do elect people to represent us and to be held accountable for their decisions. Also, like a participatory democracy, there are many pressure groups and ways in which people can get involved in politics, without directly voting like in a direct democracy. The UK does hold some features from the direct democracy system. For example, there are referendums and initiatives which enable’s everyone to vote on matters, just like in a direct democracy.…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pressure groups have many features about them that determine whether they are democratic or undemocratic. If we have to determine whether Pressure Groups benefit democracy or not, we have to know what part they play in our society. As we know, pluralists have a very positive view on pressure group politics; believing that they promote healthy debate and discussion. This is true in some aspects of society and our democracy, but pressure groups also have many undemocratic features about them.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Direct democracy should be used more widely in the UK because it avoids decisions made by representatives in their own interest. This is because the people are making the decisions. This will be beneficial because people’s voices will be heard and represented as a society. This makes it that decisions are made through societies interest. However this can be critiqued because some societies may make very stupid and unfair decisions also this ruins the purpose of having a government and other type of politicians.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the pluralist model of democracy, pressure groups play an essential role. Political parties cannot provide adequate representation for the full range of diverse interests and opinions in a modern democracy because their key function is to aggregate interests into a coherent political entity capable of governing the country. Pressure groups enable particular interests and causes to be heard and to exert influence in public decision and decision-making. Yet it is precisely the representation of specialist interests and of single issues which may give…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the pluralist model of democracy, pressure groups play an essential role. Political parties cannot provide adequate representation for the full range of diverse interests and opinions in a modern democracy because their key function is to aggregate interests into a coherent political entity capable of governing the country. Pressure groups enable particular interests and causes to be heard and to exert influence in public decision and decision-making. Yet it is precisely the representation of specialist interests and of single issues which may give cause for concern, both in terms of the methods used to achieve objectives and of the undue power and influence which particular lobbies can exert.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays