Preview

Democracy in Germany

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2445 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democracy in Germany
What is "The German Question"?
What is "The German Question"? This is a question that has been posed by many analysts over the years, each having their own views on what fulfills this question. However, each agrees that it is a question of high complexity. According to Constantin Frantz, "The German Question is the most obscure, most involved and most comprehensive problem in the whole of modern history". What makes Germanys ' question so difficult to pinpoint is the fact that for all of its existence, until 1871 and again in 1990, it has struggled to unify a nation into a single state. As history shows, the German nation has struggled to create its own nation-state. Unlike France and Britain, Germany was a nation before it was a state. That is, its people had a strong sense of nationalism and common identity as a social entity but they were lacking a strong state, or a form of political organization that claims the exclusive right to govern a specific piece of territory. As Dahrendorf states; "We want to find out what it is in German society that may account for Germany 's persistent failure to give a home to democracy in its liberal sense". But can we really analyze the problem in this way? It has not always been the same "persistent failure" hindering Germany from giving a home for democracy, but rather the problems faced by Germany throughout history.
To truly understand the German situation and its multiple struggles for unification, it is important to know the history of the present day Germany. This history is a very unique one, one very different from other European nations such as France and Britain. Therefore one can draw sharp contrasts between the process of national unification in Germany as compared to France or Britain. However, once established; "Compared with its historical precursors in England and France, industrialization in Germany occurred late, quickly, and thoroughly". Early German history can be traced back to the House of the



Bibliography: Conradt, David P. The German Polity, Longman Publishing. New York, 2001. Upper Saddle River. 2003 Microsoft Encarta Premium Online; Germany Germany. 2004. Niewyk, Donald. Lecture Notes; Inside Nazi Germany. 2004 Rosinus, Franz Sax, Benjamin. Inside Hitler 's Germany. Heath and Company, Lexington Massachusetts. 1992.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Germany was not a unified country until 1871; before that, industry developed predominantly in the powerful states such as Prussia.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nationalism was an important and integral factor in the downfall of the Weimar Republic and in turn, the ensuing failure of democracy in Germany in the period 1918-1934. The sense of loyalty and devotion to ones nation, which the German citizens had felt in their militaristic past, was ultimately devastated by WWI and its consequences. Although nationalism was a major cause of the failure of democracy in Germany, there were many other factors adding to the stress upon the countrys government at this time. This included the Treaty of Versailles, the Reparations Bill, the occupation of the Ruhr and hyperinflation. Several attempts to install nationalistic beliefs back in the government occurred, the most important of these being the Kapp Putsch by the right-wing nationalists and the Beer Hall Putsch by the right-wing Nazi party. The disillusionment felt by the people and their need to restore pride in their nation influenced many factors that led to the failure of democracy, and to the rise of the Nazi political party and its leader Adolf Hitler.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany before WW1 had a climate that possible could have led them to follow democracy. After all the biggest party in Reichstag was a democratic party and there was a constitution. Along with this the voting system was fairly progressed giving votes to most men and turnouts for these elections had increased showing political participation to be increasing along with general interest in politics. It is for these reasons that one may argue that Germany was moving towards a democracy before WW1. However despite there being democratic elements within the German government, these features actually posed a threat democracy through counteracting the changes that would have led to it. For example although a constitution existed in Germany, this constitution made it possible for the Kaiser to rule Germany in an almost authoritarian manner and therefore stop any change in it’s path. Furthermore whether or not the SDP was the most supported party in Germany is also debatable due to the Hottentot election. Rigidity of the Kaiser’s powers, the inability for those in authority to suppress those power and urge for change and the fact that the SDP may not have been as supported as was once thought are all reason that has led to the conclusion that Germany was in a state of political stalemate before the war and the layout of the government was n such a way that a democratic Germany seemed an almost impossible achievement.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The transformation of germany socially economically and geographically depended on turning points. from 1789 when nationalism only idea, to anti french feeling encouraging nationalism to the aggressive welpolitik,…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite elements of democracy, with the Kaiser at the Head of the Constitution and holding such significant powers, Wilhelminian Germany was clearly structured to maintain authority and keep the power concentrated at the top. The issue is whether or not in practice the state was totally authoritarian and how far Germany was stuck in authoritarianism, or in other words; how much potential for advancement towards democracy there was. It also needs to be established what is meant by an 'authoritarian state' as the Kaiser's power can be seen in the reflection of other powers; the Kaiser was the head of the army & appointed the Chancellor, therefore the authoritarianism & power of these two can be seen to reflect the authoritarianism & power of the Kaiser.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imperial Germany was replaced by the Weimar Republic on the 9th of November 1918 opening the door for the democracy which subsequently lead to political instability and a contrastingly new liberal society. This new republic adopted the Weimar constitution which created the first parliamentary democracy in Germany. The change in society from a previously autocratic society is highlighted by a passage in the Constitution saying “The German Commonwealth is a Republic. Political authority is derived from the People”. Electors were now all men and women above the age of 20 compared to before where it was men only above the age of 25. It also guaranteed personal freedoms such as religious freedom and freedom of speech. This new highly liberal and democratic society highlighted a change in society from the previous autocratic one controlled by the Kaiser. However the Weimar constitution had flaws in it which were used ultimately in its fall such as Article 48 and proportional representation in the Reichstag. Historian Eric Weitz said “The flaws…were to do [more] with…the fact that German society was so fragmented” highlighting that although there were flaws, they could have worked under a society more committed to democratic…

    • 1649 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bizmarck

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Certain motivating political and economic factors enabled Germany to gain its unification in the late nineteenth century. Its economic prosperity from the zollverein, technological advances, and political moves in terms of actions allowed it to ultimately acquire a solid unification by 1871.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Website “German Unification Timeline” (2010). Purbeck School Humanities. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from http://purbeckhumanities.co.uk/2010/11/17/german.unification-timeline/ Website “German Unification” (2013). Wikipedia. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unification_of_Germany Work Cited…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historiographical debate of Bismarck’s impact upon Germany began almost immediately following his rise to prominence, as the primary initial historiography within Germany demanded a “strong man”[1], “who would cut the Gordian knot of nationalistic aspirations”.[2] Thus, German historians and the public throughout the 1850s and 1860s desired Bismarck to be portrayed as a benefactor to the German society; however Bismarck was also criticised as being detrimental to the development of Germany. The differing interpretations of Bismarck throughout the 1980s were “between the kleindeutsche and groβdeutshe historians”.[3] As the kleindeutsche historians argued that the unification was a “natural birth”, the groβdeutshe viewed it as a “caesarean section”.[4] The kleindeutshe school of though was largely composed of nationalist historians Heinrich von Sybel and Treitschke. Treitschke argued that the…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand what Germany is today, one must understand the generational effect that the Third Reich not only had but continues to have. As Kempe says, “A historian would be hard-pressed to find a country where a mere dozen years of history, between 1933 and 1945, has cast such a long shadow.” Even though the Third Reich lost its power more than half a century ago, its effects on German culture and politics still stand firm. The effects can be seen in Germany’s idea of national pride and identity, race relations between Germans and German Jews, and Germany’s relationship with the international community of Europe that it fought a horrific, long, and bloody war against.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was longing for a united nation with a stable economy. The Nazi party, lead by Adolf Hitler, came to power. "And then there is another fundamental error: they have never got it clear in their own minds that there is a difference or how great a difference there is between the conception 'national' and the word 'dynastic' or 'monarchistic.' They do not understand that today it is more than ever necessary in our thoughts as Nationalists to avoid anything which might perhaps cause the individual to think that the National Idea was identical with petty everyday political views. They ought day by day to din into the ears of the masses: 'We want to bury all the petty differences and to bring out into…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nazi Preparation for War

    • 2878 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Nazis came to power in 1933. They began introducing a set of ideas into German society. These ideas were based on the Nazi ideology, outlined by Hitler’s book “Mein Kampf”. This essay will examine how the Nazis ' attempted to ‘educate’ German society to integrate their ideological beliefs, and whether these were all designed as a preparation for war. There were a number of different aims for the youth in Nazi Germany and therefore their education needed to be suitable. Education methods created a loyal following for Hitler and the Nazis. The Nazis were aware that education to the German youth would create loyal Nazis by the time they reached adulthood. Their overall aim was to create a generation of racially pure Germans who were ready to do what Hitler asked of them and most importantly; serve their country. Therefore it was necessary to mould young boys into being prepared for war.…

    • 2878 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political system. The Federal Republic of Germany is a federal state created by the German Federal Constitution (Grundgesetz, Art. 20 (1)). Germany consists of 16 states (L„nder) each with their own constitution.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays