Preview

DELIMA SIAP

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DELIMA SIAP
2.0 INTRODUCTION

In 1981, Delima Enterprise was founded by Encik Zayed in conducted trading and supplying related product including manpower supplies to oil and gas industries. In 2004, Delima Enterprise incorporated as Delima Enterprise Sdn Bhd. It has two principal shareholders and controlling director who is Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah. Both of them are husband and wife. In 2006, the company submitted application to get a loan since the company gets several contract. The director of Delima Enterprise Sdn Bhd tries to get a loan from MAYBANK and CIMB BANK. However, both bank required company’s Audited Financial Statements for the last two years.

3.0 CASE SUMMARY

This case is about an enterprise founded by family members and later was incorporated as Sdn Bhd. The shareholders are mainly the directors of husband and wife who involved in the management of the company. It was July, 2006 when Encik Zayed engaged the external auditor Aziz & Co(Chartered Accountant) introduced by his friend to perform the statutory audit for the period of 2003 to 2006. That was the first audit experience for Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah and it was a difficult learning experience. The Auditors expressed their intention to qualify the Financial Statements due to several unresolved issues. However, Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah tried to negotiate with the Auditor to not qualify the Financial Statements, failing which Encik Zayed planned to terminate the auditor’s appointment and appoint a new “friendly party” auditor. Encik Zayed and Puan Hashimah were not familiar with Accounting Standards and the provisions of the Companies Act 1965, including their roles and duties as Company Directors. The company had maintained a very lean organization and had employed their owned family members as its employees and some did not have the necessary job experiences. Time was the essence and the Audited Financial Statements had to be issued to the bank at least by September, 2006, as Encik

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    It depend upon the approach of the legal duties of the administrators which were framework in the Corporation Act. The court has noticed that the appellant provide the legal duties approaching the suer and the duties which were performed was not for the benefit of himself although it was not for the benefit of other partner too. It was only for the benefit of the company. It was noticed by the court that there has been contravention of legal duties performed by the offender discarding the prosecutor out of the building for profit and loss account and also regarding the goodwill of the company.The court held that the offender has to paid a premium for the losses which has been incurred. Although the court told them that in order for compensation they can buy shares from offender for their losses incurred.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wedtech Scandal

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Auditing failure is also a key factor contributing to the Wedtech scandal. It is presented as a result of independence of auditing reporting and confirmation.On the one hand, even if auditors complied with auditing process on the surface (Berg and barbanel, 1987), they are not independent since they were bribed to forge auditing reports.In 1982, Wedtech employed the Main Hurdman to financially audit its financial statementswhen it went to Initial Public Offerings. One of the auditing partners, Richard Bluestinefound a serious fact in auditing that two directors had transiting company’s money to their private accounts. However, he accepted a bribe from the two directors, which includes 9% of company’s shares and $900,000 low interest loans. Furthermore, Anthony Guariglia , the other auditing partner,was also bribed with 1.5% shares and a job position in Wedtech with high payment. In return, both of them covered up their financial crimes in the report and reported to SBA that the invoice falsification was only a minor infringe to the law and had been corrected by the managers.On the other hand, the legal confirmation of the auditing statement lacked independence,as the law firm named Ellenoff, Plesent& Lehrer, who issued this confirmation letter, was bribed by Wedtech (Deleon, 1993). Hence it is highly probable that the letter of confirmation was not reliable.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarity Project Paper

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Second, the Audit Planning standards provide audit planning requirements for audit practitioners and firms; the auditor is required to device an appropriate mechanism for audit strategy and audit planning. Third, the Audit Engagement Supervision requirements have also been placed on the auditor that ensures the supervision of the audit work assigned to engagement teams. Fourth, auditors are also required to consider the materiality audit planning and performance. Fifth, auditors are also required to identify and assess any potential risks of material misstatement noted in financial statements, and include information gathering and assessment of risks through analysis of the gathered information, based on AS 12. Sixth, on the basis of AS 13, auditors are required to respond to any risks of potential material misstatement in financial statements via the general performance of the audit and conducting audit processes…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finn’s willingness to go along with the actions of Monus made an already bad situation worse. Finn as the CFO should not have allowed himself to be involved in financial frauds of any sort just to show a profit. Finn should taken control of the situation right then and told Monus what he was doing was wrong and he wouldn’t take part in any of it. Shapir was just as wrong because he was aware of what Monus and Finn were doing and he just ignored it until it the fraud got out of hand. Coopers & Lybrand as the auditors did not exercise due professional care in performing the audit. I don’t feel they obtained sufficient competent evidential matter and they did not use professional judgment when they informed Phar-Mor in advance which stores…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jamaica Water Properties

    • 21349 Words
    • 86 Pages

    The case is about an accounting fraud that involves the Jamaica Water Properties, Inc. The fraud was characterized by misapplication of purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, recording fictitious assets, improper accounting for NOLCO, non-recording of appropriate allowances for uncollectible receivables, and misapplication of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for long-term contracts. Ernest Grendi made the fraud possible, company CFO as helped by three senior accountants. These were aimed to inflate the price of the company stocks because of overstated earnings that caused them to receive sizable bonuses. However, JWP internal auditors just tolerated all of these because of their fear of being fired. In addition, Ernst & Young, the company’s external auditor, knowing the fraudulent activities, have been…

    • 21349 Words
    • 86 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Waste Management fraud

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What was the relationship between management and the auditors? Why didn’t the auditors prevent the fraud?…

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conservative Recognition

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Amelia hired her nephew Nick to start working with her couple months after his graduation. He does not have any on hand accounting experience, but finds something in the financial statement with which he is not comfortable with. He believes that there may be an error or that maybe it should be check to ensure that everything is being done to standards. He thought to himself that maybe he was overlooking at the issues because he knew Aunt Amelia was honest and Aunt Amelia trusted Lee and saw him as an honest person. Nick also knew that his aunt was not an accounting savvy and therefore wouldn’t know if something was being done incorrectly. He also took into account the fact that they their accounting controls were effective and the audit committee was composed of five business community members. Although the company was mainly owned by his family any decision regarding material aspect was always discussed with the audit committee. Finally, outside auditors had given a clean opinion.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lincoln Case

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page

    3.) The auditor’s examination is affected since the related party transactions were not done legally. They showed that the company had significantly more assets than in reality. The auditor should check the cash balances with the bank this would help identify what the total balance is with the accounts. You would then be able to identify whether the amount recorded is higher or lower than the actual amount.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Operation Broken Gate

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The accounting firm was charged $8.2 million by the SEC because the firm violated the independence principles of the SEC. While providing the audit service, KPMG provided accounting services like bookkeeping, payroll for the audit client. That creates the self-review threat and impairs auditor’s independence which is stated in the second principle of the general standard of independence of the SEC “places an accountant in the position of auditing her own work.” KPMG also provided management service through sending the staff to work on senior position for its client affiliate. Moreover, the staff was a senior management of the client’s affiliate before and just retired. The accounting firm created the management participation and advocacy threats to independence and violated the third and fourth principle of the SEC independence standards which states “place the accountant acting like the client’s management or employees and being an advocate for the client.” Moreover, KPMG let some employees own the client’s stocks that impairs the auditor’s independence as pointed out by the first independence principle “creating reciprocal interest between the two parties.” Through the case, we can see that KPMG violated all independence principles of the SEC even there are many rules established by the SEC, AICPA, and PCAOB to help them maintain…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper explores the ZZZZ Best Company which was begun by a 16 year old individual who was able to pull the wool over the eyes of many customers, investors and auditors. This paper will define the difference between review and audit when it comes to financial reports, comments on the procedures provided with regard to the management assertion of occurrence, verification of payments for jobs and how they can lead auditors to improper conclusion, the purpose of predecessor-successor auditor communications, as well as whom needs to initiate the communication and information that needs to be obtained. The paper also addresses the limitations of the confidentiality agreement and how and when client-imposed audit scope limitations affect the type of audit opinion used as well what procedures professional standards require auditors to perform when reviewing a client's pre-audit report and post-year-end earnings press release. Accuracy, honesty and integrity are both keys to the success in auditing and following the rules of GAAP are a must for all those involved.…

    • 3666 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Auditing

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The following are independent situations and you should refer to APES (Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards 110 “Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants”) and the Corporations Act 2001 as a minimum for each situation. You need to identify any breaches (under what section) and why. You should also consider any remedy or alternative course of action that should have been considered for each where appropriate.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the roles of professional accountants in relation to their compliance to the By-Laws of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants as in this Chicken Run case is integrity. Integrity means members of accountants shall at all time be straightforward, honest and sincere. They must perform their work with diligence, responsibility, and complete sincere truthfulness. Auditor should not involve in any illegal activities that could bring down their reputation. Based on this case, the professional accountants should always check the financial statement of the company so that the information in the financial statement has fairly presented. This can be seen where Encik Munir, one of the former staff at the finance department, did not do his work honestly. He may have taken the money paid by the customer to him as he is the only person in charge in receiving payment from customer. This is said so because the confirmation letters from the creditors figures did not tie up with the balances in the accounts.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    satyam

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mahindra Satyam is an IT company in India that recently perpetrated a large accounting scandal.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Flat Cargo Bhd

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The protagonist or decision-maker in this case is Mr Chuah Mun Soong, auditor from Kencana & Associates which responsible to make a financial audit for Flat Cargo Berhad (FCB). In 2006, while prepare audit work for Flat Cargo Berhad, the auditors discover several suspicious result which lead to delay a decision in finalizing the auditor’s report. Mr Chuah had been informed by his subordinates that there had been inconsistencies in the accounts of Flat Cargo Berhad. Mr Chuah needs to gain more information from the company in order to inform his boss, Mr Keong Chee Wah about the situation occur in the client’s company. Mr Chuah was in dilemma because he wants to keep good the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chicken Run

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Objectivity means that an auditor must be independent in appearance and in fact, and also to be unbiased and impartial. For an auditor to be independent, they should not have any financial nor managerial relationship with anyone or anything that has to do with the company being audited. In this case, the professional accountants have to be objectivity in evaluating the going concern issue. They have to investigate the relationship between Encik Selamat and Encik Azman. They should ask Encik Selamat to proceed to the legal suits against Cold Gold Sdn. Bhd.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays