Preview

Deliberative Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
640 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deliberative Democracy
Deliberative democracy is a relatively new concept, having been first introduced by Bessette in 1980. This makes it somewhat more relevant in today’s society than some of the other models of democracy. As stated before, a deliberative model is one which can be described as a ‘discursive democracy’. To be discursive is to “proceed to a conclusion through reason rather than intuition’, therefore here, the publics opinions and views is an integral part of the law making process. As with deliberative democracy being all about the people’s opinion, this places emphasis on the fact that there can be no fixed opinion. Both parties must therefore convince the other that there view is correct.
Deliberative democracy can be seen in practise on a daily basis in the UK, when the Government and the opposition engage in debates where they take the opportunity to try and convince the other side that they are the correct party. What is apparent in this model is that both representative and direct models of democracy are used here. As we elect M.P’s on their mandate, they are therefore our chosen representative and make decisions on our behave. On the opposite end of the scale, the UK can participate in a referendum, which is a direct method of democracy in which the people either reject or accept a proposal. Although this is a rarity in the UK, as it tends to undermine the power of Parliament.
As with anything, there are aspects which are considered beneficial in comparison with other models of democracy. Particularly the view that deliberative democracy meets the needs of many as opposed to just a few. People can therefore see the bigger picture and this inevitably enables them to make an informed decision about what society needs as a whole, instead of what the individual needs. To consider the wider opinions will give the public a much better knowledge and understanding of the issues and this ultimately means the decisions reached in the end up are for the best for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    But, moreover, referendums do not strengthen the democracy. At best it substitutes direct democracy for parliamentary democracy. This means that decisions are not made on the basis of careful deliberation and debate.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an argument that the government has the power and right to change laws and represent people without necessarily having to be elected. This can also be known as ‘Democratic deficit’. An example of democratic deficit is the House of Lords. The members in the House of Lords aren’t elected but they get to make laws and represent the people. The members in House of Lords are usually given their seats hereditarily so many people found it unfair that they’re not elected into the Parliament but they can make decisions and laws on our behalf.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate how democratic in practice, initiatives and referendums are in making public policy. (30 marks)…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Direct democracy: a form of democracy in which people decide (e.g. vote on, form…

    • 3675 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wider use of referendums in the UK could potentially help improve democracy. A wider use of referendums would improve democracy in the UK because of the bigger chance that the people are given to cast their vote on issues that will affect them directly, and the country. There has been use of referendums in the past, such as Northern Ireland and the Good Friday vote, and the 2011 AV referendum, although they have been limited. If referendums were more widely used voters would be given a greater opportunity for involvement, and give the government a much more accurate and representative opinions and beliefs from the public.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it seems like direct democracy would give an accurate representation of the population, a representative democracy provides more fair and equal decisions. This is because representatives can make decisions while keeping the minority in mind. In a direct democracy, the majority will always come out on top, simply because there are more people. Also, representatives are not emotionally invested in every issue, so they can make more logical and rational decisions. People often prioritize their values and beliefs over the welfare of others when voting on representatives, and they will do the same when they vote on important issues.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The booklet tries to establish an overall picture of some of the main historian’s views/interpretations of the British topic. This booklet has the advantage of focusing your attention on relevant material and ensures efficient reading, and use of your time.…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Founding Fathers began designing America’s government in 1787, one of their greatest fears was the possibility of the dumb majority using their power to pass uneducated and disastrous legislature. They feared “the mob”, the everyday citizens that had little schooling and knew almost nothing about politics. To avoid giving the voters too much power, a Representative-Democracy style government was created, a system where citizens would vote for a person or group to represent them in making legislature. Referendum votes bypass the politicians and ask for the people’s opinion directly- they are direct votes where the entire country is invited to vote on an issue, which give the people a chance for their voices to be heard. While a good…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public reason, in this set up, functions as the ultimate source and barometer of legitimacy in any democratic society. For maximalists, the legitimate use of coercion by agents of the democratic state requires a more substantive commitment to the core values of democracy that regard individual citizens as free and equal members of society. Deliberative democracy is premised on the “fact of reasonable pluralism,”20 which speaks to the observable reality of multiple commitments, obligations, and beliefs that condition the behavior and reasoning of individuals in society (Thompson, 2008). As such, whereas in the minimalist conception the ultimate objective is the formation of government through democratic procedures, the maximalist view strives for the observance and practice of democratic values in society as a whole. Moreover, since it is conceivable that a government elected through free and fair democratic procedures may enact unjust laws or even infringe upon the rights of their citizens due to certain beliefs or under special circumstances, there must exist a deliberative framework through which opposing views are represented and the meaning of dominant values challenged regardless of who is in power (Rawls, 2009).…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dispute over direct or representational democracy has been a heated discussion for several years. There are some persuasive arguments on either side of the table.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referendums are devices for obtaining extra legitimacy for policy proposals or for reducing internal party disputes over party alternatives. They tend to replace the normal role of parliament and are a form of direct democracy, although initiation comes from the government and not the governed. There is an indication of the growing frequency of the use of referendums as a way of legitimising policies or appealing to the public beyond divided party structures. What was seen as non-British, inconsistent with parliamentary sovereignty, has quickly established itself as a central part of the British political process. Referendums have been called as a result of political expediency when the survival of the government depends upon it calling a referendum…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory behind direct democracy seems to fit what the American people want exactly. The people have a direct say on things that will affect their government, such as amendments and laws (Reilly 6). In America, people use initiatives, recalls, and referenda to make their opinions heard by the government. This is a good thing in the eyes of many Americans because it means the people have more of a voice in the government then they usually would have. It also means that the government has…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Representative democracy is a form of government where elected officials are voted on the behalf of the people to represent them in government processes; it is a corrupt system due to the lack of accomplishment for the common good. This is demonstrated throughout numerous ways such as flaws in education, illusions of freedom, the voting influencing on the democratic environment, and ultimately the absence of the greater good. School is the main resource that teaches people what they need to know in order to succeed in the “real world”.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Daahl, R. A. (2000). On Democrcy. New Heaven: Yale University . Heywood, A. (2007). Political Ideologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Heywood, A. (2007). Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillian. Zorach, A. (2010, September 12). . Retrieved 12 11, 2010, from Cazor: cazor…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, I will show that democracy is best thought of as a process rather than some static ideal. By thinking of it in this way, we can better assess potential changes to our governments and societies by looking at the changes individually and see whether each will make our government and societies more democratic. I will also show that some level of deliberation is one of the dimensions of change necessary to make for a more democratic government because it better serves the self-interest of everyone. Third, I argue that only certain forms of deliberation are democratic, namely, ones that allow for participants to interact effectively (non-coercively, with supported beliefs, and with a likelihood of understanding). Finally, I will show that what I will call “dialogic deliberation” provides the conditions for a democratic form of deliberation because it delivers a way for participants to interact effectively.…

    • 4599 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics