Preview

Definitions of Abnormal Behavior

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Definitions of Abnormal Behavior
Definitions of Abnormal Behavior

Through the years it has been understood that there exists a great deal of difficulty when attempting to define an individual case of abnormal behavior. Many pros and con’s must be described and studied in order to accurately define, decipher, or explain a particular aspect of the many behavioral abnormalities. Abnormalities as a legal concept can be defined most simply as the definition of insanity given by the judicial system, which makes it a legal term as opposed to a psychological one. Insanities definition differs from one state, city, or jurisdiction to another. In some situations insanity is deemed as whether or not the person fully or correctly understands the complete separation of right from wrong. Other entities may see insanity as whether or not the defendant clearly understands if his or her behavior was actually criminal, or non criminal, or if they were able to or not able to control themselves and their behavior leading up to, or at the time of the act. In some states insanity is not even a viable defense at all. Abnormality as the inability to function effectively deals with whether someone is able to live their life as a productive member of society. Meaning ones ability to hold gainful employment, interact well with other members of society, nourish their self properly or even maintain a normal level of hygiene. There are some who are not able to function accordingly within their particular society. Those who are found to not be able to properly adapt to their respective societies basic demands may be viewed as abnormal based on their inability to conform in these basic modes of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal definition of insanity stated by therapist Bryan Howes is “n. mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.” Which emphasizes the idea that if an individual is not in control of their actions, then they are to be considered insane. In some cases, this period of “unawareness” can compose dangerous situations depending on what actions are performed in his/her unconscious state of mind.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of abnormality is crucial to establish whether someone is diagnosed as mentally ill, and the treatment that the patient receives is primarily based on the diagnosis. To determine if someone bizarre behavior is an indicator of a psychological disorder, mental health professionals may use specific criteria such as context and persistence of the behavior, subjective distress, effect on functioning, to name a few.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is a controversial legal defense which states that a defendant should not be found culpable of a crime on the basis of insanity. The main factor that makes this defense so controversial is the difficulty in interpreting what exactly should be defined as insanity. To add the distortion, many different states also have completely different rules and attitudes towards the insanity defense. Many misconceptions about the insanity defense exist throughout society. For starters, the term insanity is strictly a legal term, not a psychological or medical term. Although various movies and television shows portray the insanity defense as a commonly used and successful defense, the opposite is true in reality. Even though statistics…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When someone claims insanity, they are not held responsible for their criminal actions. There are two pieces of evidence the first being the accused was unable to tell right from wrong and the second that the accused did not intend to act the way he or she did and/or could not control their behavior. The insanity defense should not be a valid excuse to free criminals. Insanity is a legal term, not a psychological one, and experts disagree whether it has valid psychological meaning. Critics of not guilty by reason of insanity have claimed that too many sane defendants use the insanity defense to escape justice; that the state of psychological knowledge encourages expensive "dueling expert" contests that juries are unlikely to understand; that, in practice, the defense unfairly excludes some defendants. Research on not guilty by reason of insanity fails to support most of these claims but some serious problems may exist with…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Law

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There was a case by the name of John Hinckley case that was re-popularized the tough rule of the M'Naghten creating an ambiguous relationship between law, psychiatry, and neuroscience. Insanity, at the end of the day is a legal determination. The fact that the legal system had the authority to form and terminate the various laws of defense shows that it is a very malleable system of practice.…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the science of psychology one’s behavior needs to follow a certain criteria in order to be deemed “normal”. If one’s behavior does not match the criteria, their behavior is seen as undesirable and wrong (requires change). For this physiologists need to be able to view a person’s behavior and be able to tell the difference between normal and abnormal. Whilst defining the “normality” of ones behavior physiologists need to be careful to remain objective and as free of any bias as possible, furthermore their experiment to determine ones behavior needs to be repeatable and reliable.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this case, Maria is showing severe symptoms of mania. While the person is asking her questions, she is answering them with rushed speech and she is stuttering as well. Not only is her speech affected, but also she is fidgeting a great deal throughout the video, which is known as hyperactivity.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To this day, only five states deny the defendant of the use of insanity defense. The insanity defense has such a firm historical and moral origin that provide fairness to defendants who suffer from mental disorders. It is important that the government and the public to treat them with consideration; provide them with the treatment that suitable for the individual’s illness to make them better in hope of release them back into the community when they are no longer a threat to the public rather than to confine them in prison and let them…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The principles include if they do not understand the consequences of their conduct, can not tell if their conduct is wrong, and is not able to control their conduct (Gaines & Miller p. 81). To prove insanity there are a series of test that can be done, in order to classify someone as insane. Those test include include the M’Naghten rule, the Substantial- Capacity test, and the Irresistible-impulse test. Criminals can also be found guilty, but mentally ill. The insanity defense is rarely used, because it is hard to prove that someone is actually insane. It also can come down to the jury, to decide whether or not the defendant is actually mentally ill(Gaines & Miller p. 82). There have been cases where people use the insanity defense, because of their mental illness. Some cases that used the insanity defense and were successful were Eddie Routh, and Andrea Yates. The insanity defense did not work for Andrew Goldstein, Jonathan…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abnormal behaviour violates moral or ideal standards or differs from commonly accepted beliefs or ways of thinking. It is a way to find a dispositional cause of disruptive behaviour instead of situational factors (fundamental attribution error). Instead of saying “evil”, “bad” or “crazy”, we say “anti-social personality disorder” or “schizophrenia”.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abnormal Personality Traits

    • 4139 Words
    • 17 Pages

    evolutionary sense were added as part of the definition of whether the personality was normal or…

    • 4139 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1998 Rosenhan & Seligman described the seven elements common to most definitions of abnormality. The seven elements they can up with are suffering, maladaptiveness, irrationality and incomprehensibility, unpredictability and loss of control, vividness and unconventionality, observer discomfort, and violation of moral and ideal standards.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defining abnormality is a complicated matter. When asked to describe abnormal behavior, it is usually defined as an infrequent event, is odd or strange, the characteristics of abnormality include danger and tragedy. Once a behavior influences the way of living successfully functioning in an important aspect of life, which will include the psychological, interpersonal and achievement…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays