Preview

Introduction To Deep Ecology

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Introduction To Deep Ecology
Deep ecology is a way of life. A way of life that is shifting the way we view ourselves as humans. Deep ecology is the means of shifting the value of humans to non-human nature. Humans can no longer look at themselves as the sole entity of the ecosystem, but part of a whole that needs each part to successfully work. Fritjof Capra believes that shifting our views from the old world anthropocentric to new world non-anthropocentric is the key to the survival of the human race. Having anthropocentric views means that you believe that humans hold a higher value than nature does. Capra states that before the seventeen century scientific revolution, humans once held non-anthropocentric views. Humans viewed themselves as part of the natural order of life and scientists believed that humans should work in synch with nature. This thinking changed during the seventeen century scientific revolution, when the goals of scientists changed from working in synch with nature to controlling nature. This shift in thinking and values greatly changed the views of humans from non-anthropocentric to anthropocentric. For many years now, humans have held anthropocentric views and values, but Capra pleads that humans shift their thinking once again to the new paradigm that is deep ecology. Deep ecology, as Capra states, “is now crucial for our well-being--even for our survival!-- and such a shift is indeed occurring.” Capra believes that deep ecology will change the way that we as humans see nature as well as our daily lives. One of the main reasons why we do not already see deep ecology values in our daily lives is because, as Arne Naess insists, “if professional ecologists persist in voicing their value priorities, their jobs are often in danger, or they tend to lose influence and status among those who are in charge of overall policies.” Naess believes that the current policies of ecology are founded on shallow, short-term human interests, which desperately need to change.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In chapter one of “The Rambunctious Garden”, Emma Marris presents us with a different way of viewing nature. Instead of seeing nature as a place “untouched by humanity’s great grubby hands," Marris wants us to value nature in places such as the “highway median” or the “old field overgrown with weeds”. She argues that the goal of returning nature to its prehuman state is incredibly expensive and nearly impossible. Marris explained that, “Many conservationists are opening up their definitions of nature and embracing a whole suite of possible goals beyond the familiar pristine wilderness goal.” One specific example she offers to support her argument involves an experiment being conducted in Hawaii.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Born in 1912, philosopher Arne Naess created the ideas, and term “Deep Ecology” to portray the ideas that nature itself, has greater value than just its use by human beings. He states that all life forms have the right to flourish and reach its full potential without human interference (First Principle). He expressed these ideas through the 8 principles of Deep Ecology, which, in my eyes are extremely similar to traditional Native American beliefs and stories in the writings of Linda Hogan and Barry Lopez.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold was a conservationist, forester philosopher, educator, writer and outdoor enthusiast and was among the founding fathers of the North American conservation movement during the first half of twentieth century (Leopold, 1981). He argues that humans are part of a community that includes the land, from the soil to the rivers and seas (Leopold, 1981). According to Leopold (1981), until humans recognize that they are part of the land and act accordingly, they will continue to negatively impact the environment and their own health by extension (Leopold, 1981)…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    geog257

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Quite often, environmental issues are discussed in terms of economic, political and/or social implications. Ethical issues, fundamental to the topic, are usually ignored. Failure to consider these issues is often understandable when the nature of pragmatic politics and economics is understood. Ethical positions are most often phrased as questions asking how we, as humans, relate to other humans individually, to other humans as groups, to other humans still to be born, to other forms of life and/or to entire sets ranging from ecosystems to the entire planet. Questions as to humans’ relations with nature are often raised as well as the relationship between technology and progress – for example, are gains from technological innovations mainly accrued by the wealthy and often at the expense of poor or dispossessed peoples? To what extent do technological innovations generate serious social and ecological problems? Is progress in meeting human needs always at the expense of nature? Is the biotechnology revolution in agriculture in the best interest of both humanity and nature? Questions such as these will be dealt with as our course proceeds during the semester.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Abby

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Modern, industrialized society’s technological advancements and emphasis on material possessions, consumerism, and monetary success combine to disconnect people from their natural surroundings which encompasses all living and non-living things occurring naturally including the interaction of all living species, climate, weather, and natural resources that affect human survival and economic activity. Since the beginning of human (homo- sapiens) existence going back to the Pleistocene Epoch in the Cenozoic Era, humans have been consistently creating, developing, and evolving their means of technology and standard of living throughout time until now. Unfortunately, by doing so humans are furthering themselves form nature, but as Edward Abby, an…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the author says waiting for an ecological crisis to persuade mankind to change their troubled relationship with nature would mean waiting a long, long time.” (MacKinnon, 2013). The author’s novel has impacted my understanding and appreciation of nature and has raised questions and concerns about its fate. As a result, I have gained a more diverse perspective on environmental thought and human nature…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boat of Ethics

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ecology, most simply put, is "the study of relationships between organisms and their environment". (Encyclopedia Britannica) Garrett Hardin, writer of the essay Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor was a professor of human ecology at the University of California at Santa Barbara and had some extremely harsh opinions about the solution to global population issues. As a professor of human ecology, Hardin studied the relationship between humans and their environment, and in this case the entire globe. It is a well known fact that environmental degradations, unequal wealth distribution and exponential population growth are growing problems in the world, and in his essay, Hardin explains that there are relatively simple solutions to these problems. While Hardin's solutions to the interconnected global environment, economic and population problems are harsh and potentially immoral, Hardin convinced me they are the only solutions to a growing global issue.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It can be argued that human instinct is an ever evolving characteristic that is never always in sync with that of nature. Human’s have the ability and sometimes the burden to understand and comprehend what is happening to him and his surroundings. One thing that is consistent with Human instinct is that the level of understanding and the ability to adapt to one’s surrounding has both different points of views and attitudes towards what direction one should progress. What should the humans do to live sustainably?In Wendell Barry’s Getting along with Nature, Berry feels that change begins with the realization of interdependency between nature and humans. In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garret Hardin, the population is the greatest evil facing sustainability. Hardin and Berry are the quintessential polar opposites in regards to their own personal perceptions, human nature, and faith in society but if we could meld these two minds then the idea of sustainability could become a reality.…

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deep ecology - Giving all life respect and value – caring for all of nature, not just the aspects of nature which benefit human beings.…

    • 3380 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is as easily extended to a policy of strict conservation or preservation as it is to resource exploitation, as each of these positions would be in some regard good for humans. From a strong anthropocentrist view, one might “have no interest in preserving penguins for their own sake; penguins are important because people enjoy seeing them walk on rocks.” (Clowney & Mosto, 335) The environmental position here is still that penguins are important. Strict adherence to strong anthropomorphism does not disqualify a person from classification as an environmentalist; in fact with very few exceptions, environmentalists still value human needs and desires and moral concern above those of an individual non-human, which is the fundamental assertion of weak anthropomorphism. Biocentrism offers a much expanded definition of moral standing and intrinsic value; extending these characteristics from humans to all and only individual living things. This concept, in conjunction with the slightly less expanded sentio-centrism of Peter Singer and Tom Regan and the further-expanded moral consideration of the biotic community inherent in ecocentrism and deep ecology, more explicitly defines the moral obligations of humans with regard to environmental policy. The concept of radical equality is perhaps the most contentious claim of biocentrists; however it is neither necessary nor detrimental to the usefulness of biocentric reasoning to environmentalism. All of these positions make definitive claims as to what ought or ought not be done, and though they rely on different reasoning, they agree on appropriate courses of action in most cases. Philosophically the differences here are, undoubtably, significant and worthy of exploration and debate. In the context of modern environmentalism and public policy, however, these fundamentally distinct philosophies work together toward…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The whole spectrum of environmentalism and sustainability has been demonstrated through William Cronon’s “The Trouble with Wilderness”, Donald Waller’s “Getting Back to Right Nature”, and David Owen’s “Green Manhattan”. These pieces of writing build on one another while revealing weaknesses the others may maintain. Despite the opposition some of these authors face all three of them share a common goal, the desire to better the wilderness. However, the question still remains, whose solution is best? In a world where opinions and ideas are thrown at people daily it is hard for one to know what the right choice is. This being said, a solution that would contribute to the reader making the best decision, is…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Women in Religion

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Deep ecology: combines biology with symbolic, psychological, and ethical patterns, to seek a life affirming culture…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Modernity or the Modern Age as it is commonly referred to, drastically changed the society we live in. The rapid advancements in physics, chemistry, mathematics and other sciences have enabled humans to reach peaks that were previously rendered unimaginable, or even impossible in the pre-modernity era. From inventions like television sets, microwaves, cars and personal computers (PCs) to walking on the Moon and breaking the speed of sound – all pay credit to the modern era. The age of modernity therefore represents a shift from feudalism towards industrialisation, secularization and ultimately, capitalism itself (Barker, 2005: 444). The immense effects that these advancements and inventions had on our society, lead to the break between modernity and any other previous historical periods. The term ‘modern’ itself, originates in Latin and translates to, “just now” (Oxford Dictionary, 2011: internet). The implicit argument therefore, is that within modernity people are mainly focused on the present and future – no longer on the past (Wood, 1997: 544-545). As it will be shown, the advancements brought by modernity have more recently backlashed with a multitude of negative effects. Issues such as, climate change, toxic hazards, CO2 emissions, and food additives represent only a few threats that our society and the larger world face today, “In the modernization process, more and more destructive forces are being unleashed, forces before which the human imagination stands in awe” (Beck, 1992: 20). This brings us to the sociological concept of ‘Risk Society’ developed by Ulrich Beck in 1986 in Germany (translated into English in 1992). Throughout this paper we will seek to discover if ‘security’ is ever possible in the risk society.…

    • 3135 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deep Ecology

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When I came into this class and first heard the term, “deep ecology,” I thought that it was simply referring to being environmentally friendly, saving paper and the whole “going green” movement. However, I now know that what I was thinking of is considered “shallow ecology,” according to Arnie Naas. I wasn’t completely off in my thinking because shallow ecology is an aspect of deep ecology, however it is only a very thin layer. There is really no simple definition for deep ecology because it is such a vast idea. Nevertheless, there are several key features that give us a better understanding of what it is all about.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What are the priorities? Most ecologists answered something like this: clean up the most threatened areas first. Work to unsnarl the fragmented, overlapping responsibility on national, state, and local levels. Focus research on finding environmental answers—there is so…

    • 2316 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays