Preview

Law: Deed Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
678 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law: Deed Case Study
Abstract

This paper will look into the question asked in class BA260 of “Wiley and Gemma are neighbors. Wiley’s lot is extremely large, and his present and future use of it will not involve the entire area. Gemma wants to build a single-car garage and driveway along the present lot boundary. Because of ordinances requiring buildings to be set back fifteen feet from an adjoining property line, and because of the placement of her existing structures, Gemma cannot build the garage. Gemma contracts to purchase ten feet of Wiley’s property along their boundary line for $3,000. Wiley is willing to sell but will give Gemma only a quitclaim deed, whereas Gemma wants a warranty deed. Discuss the differences between these deeds as they would affect the rights of the parties if the title to this ten feet of land later proved to be defective.” This paper will explain the differences between a quitclaim deed and a warranty deed. While explaining why Gemma wants a warranty deed versus a quitclaim deed. Deeds First we must start by explaining the difference between a Quit Claim Deed and a Warranty Deed. As Defined on uslegal.com as a Quit Claim Deed is a deed which transfers only that interest in the real property which the grantor actually has. While a Warranty Deed is that which guarantees that the grantor owns title. So what exactly does that all mean? Also why exactly does Gemma want a warranty deed instead of a quit claim deed?
What is a Quit Claim Deed? The legal definition of a Quit Claim Deed is a deed which transfers only that interest in the real property which the grantor actually has. This means nothing to me so in layman’s terms “A quit claim deed contains no warranties and the seller doesn't have liability to the buyer for other recorded claims on the property. The purchaser takes the property subject to existing taxes, assessments, liens, encumbrances, covenants, conditions, restrictions, rights of way and easements of record.” (uslegal.com)



References: USLEGAL.COM, Quit Claim Deed Law & Legal Definition, http://definitions.uslegal.com/q/quit-claim-deed/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Tenn.Ct.App., 2008). In this case the following facts were argued: The dispute arose over a strip of land located on the northern side of Underwood Repair Service's property Lot 1 and the southern side of the Deans' property Lot 2. Underwood Repair Service asserted that it owned the disputed strip of land in fee simple, or, in the alternative, through adverse possession. The Deans filed a motion to dismiss both claims, and the trial court granted the motion to dismiss the adverse possession claim, finding…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The recording acts determine which party will prevail when a piece of property is given to at least two different parties. There are three types of jurisdictions under the recording act: notice jurisdiction, race jurisdiction, and race-notice jurisdiction. In a notice jurisdiction, the purchasers will prevail over an earlier purchaser if the current purchaser had no knowledge of the transfer and there was no record of the earlier purchaser’s deed. In a race jurisdiction the determination of which party will prevail is based solely on which party has their deed recorded first. In a race notice jurisdiction the subsequent purchaser will prevail over the earlier purchaser if the subsequent purchaser did not know, and their deed is recorded before the earlier purchaser’s deed.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blaw

    • 3523 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Question 2. Refer to the provisions from the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic). Suppose that, on Monday 4th March 2002 Barbara signs a contract to buy an apartment by private sale in Parkville (close to Melbourne University) for $125,000. On Wednesday 6th March she regrets her decision and wants to terminate the contract. On the basis of the information contained in the Act, can she do what she wants?…

    • 3523 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A warranty deed serves several purposes; it documents the transfer of a property title in exchange for a mutually agreed-upon price, and guarantees that the seller has the right to sell the property, free of liens or other debt.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Real Estate Key Terms

    • 3796 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Deed:-Deed is a legal document that grants the bearer a right or privilege, provided that he or she meets a number of conditions. Usually title is conveyed from one person (the grantor) to another (the grantee) by means of a written instrument called a deed.…

    • 3796 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 310 Week 6 Case Studt

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A quitclaim deed gives no covenant of title. A quitclaim deed says: “I am conveying to you any interest I have in this property. I don’t know what other interests there may be.” This means that you may be taking on burdens of the past, such as a mortgage, attachment, judgment lien, or any other interest in real property un-knowingly. Therefore, if I default on the loan taken from Dr. Patel and he take’s ownership of the land and attempts sell it to get his money back, the land may not be worth what was lent because the property may have past interests.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Direction – where a beneficiary instructs their trustee to hold an interest on trust for another person.…

    • 3115 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal liabilities for sellers after the home is sold and transfer of ownership is complete may exist depending on terms and conditions all parties signed as part of the purchase agreement. The language can be confusing and vague, especially when it comes to the extent of the repairs sellers are responsible for completing. Buyers may have legal liabilities according…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specific Performance

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first scenario states: Tarrington contracts to sell her house and lot to Rainier. Then, on finding another buyer willing to pay a higher purchase price, she refused to deed the property to Rainier. The specifics of this case are unknown; however, based solely on the information provided I believe Rainier is entitled to specific performance as long as the property has not yet been sold. One element of real estate specific performance is that the contract must be fulfilled, unless the land is unavailable because it was sold to someone else. In that scenario damages will be awarded…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For a trust instrument to be valid and effective, it must be properly constituted. For a trust to be deemed as completely constituted, all of the relevant formalities must have been satisfied by the settlor, hence the legal title of the property must transfer to the trustees. The reason for a conveyance of property to the hands of trustee is explained in Milroy v Lord (1862) by Turner L.J. is that a valid and effectual voluntary settlement will exist, when the settlor have done everything which was necessary according to the nature of property comprised in the settlement, which is to transfer that particular property to the trustee. This requirement of constitution of trust is clear and straightforward, the law require the trust to be completely constituted, so the trust would bind the the settlor and it will be enforceable by the beneficiary. However if the formalities is not satisfied, the law will render the settlement as incompletely constituted trust. Once the settlement is deemed to be incompletely constituted trust, the beneficiary could not enforce their right in the trust. This is due to the maxim in equity “equity will not assist a volunteer” and “equity will not perfect an imperfect gift”, which meant that equity is reluctant to offer assistance to those who does not provide consideration. Hence an absolute owner must transfer the legal ownership of the property to the trustee in accordance to the relevant formalities, and if the formalities are not satisfied, there will be no transfer of property to the beneficiary. It is also important for the court to understand the meaning of an ‘imperfect gift’, as Arden L.J in Pennington v Waine [2002] would treat a gift as imperfect if it was ineffective at law; but a gift can be perfected in equity if the legal title have not transferred. Also the court is prevented from helping a volunteer beneficiary regardless of how undesirable the outcome turn out to be. The general rule is seen…

    • 4290 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first question is whether there is a legal ownership or an equitable one? For legal ownership the answer is always joint tenancy because under s34-36&s1 LPA. Tenancy in common in the act is related to by under divided shared. The reason they decided that legal title should be in joint tenancy in 1925 was to make conveyancing proper. In joint ownership each legal owner owns the whole thing.…

    • 14139 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deep Poll

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A DEED is a legal document binding a single person, or several persons acting jointly, to an agreement.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Property Law

    • 24340 Words
    • 98 Pages

    The dominant view in the United States is that property rights arise only through government; this view is known as legal positivism. For example, in Johnson v. M’Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823), the Supreme Court stressed that in deciding land claims based on Native American rights, it could only rely on laws adopted by the federal government, not on natural law or abstract justice.…

    • 24340 Words
    • 98 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    electronic conveyancing

    • 1602 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stage 1. Upon settlement of transfer fees, the conveyancer drafts a proposal deed of transfer in duplicate deriving the authority to do so from the agreement of sale. A power of attorney is used to grand power to a conveyancer to appear before the registrar of deeds to pass transfer. In drafting the proposal deed of transfer, the conveyancer refers to the deed from the seller and other information from the deeds office. The deed of transfer conveys the real right of ownership where such right has been originally granted2. At this stage a search of the property is conducted by the conveyancer at the deeds office.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays