Preview

Decision Making: Rational Comprehensive, Incremental, and Mixed Scanning Theories

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Decision Making: Rational Comprehensive, Incremental, and Mixed Scanning Theories
Decision-Making
“A policy decision involves action by some official person or body to adopt, modify, or reject a preferred policy alternative.” (Anderson, 125) Usually this is the result of many decisions during the policy process. Individuals and organizations also participate in making policy decisions but the final authorities who partake making the policy decisions are formal authorities’ also known as public officials like: executives, legislators and administrative judges. The decisions made by such authorities are ruminated as legitimate as long as the authorities meet the procedural and substantive standards. Within this decision making process there are theories that are the quantitative models of such like: the rational comprehensive theory, the incremental theory and the mixed scanning.
The rational-comprehensive theory obtains views of the economists as well as other people like mathematicians, psychologists and other social scientists. (Anderson, 126) The rational-comprehensive theory includes six elements: (1) The decision maker is confronted with a problem that can be separated from other problems or at least considered meaningfully in comparison, (2) the goals, values, or objectives that guide the decision-maker are known and can be clarified and ranked according to their importance, (3) the various alternatives for dealing with the problem are examined, (4) the consequences (costs and benefits, advantages) that would follow from selecting each alternative are investigated, (5) each alternative, and its attendant consequences, is then compared with the other alternatives, and (6) the decision-maker will choose the alternative, and its consequences, that maximizes attainment of his or her goals, values, or objectives. (Anderson, 127)
The incremental theory involves limited changes or supplementing policies sometimes referring it as “disjointed incrementalism” wherein the “(1) selection of goals or objectives and the empirical analysis of the



References: Anderson, James E., Public Policymaking, Seventh Edition, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this paper we will discuss the final stages of how a topic becomes a policy. The paper will discuss formulation, implementation, and the legislation stage. These stages must be done in this order to ensure the policy is being formed the correct way and not scattered around. This paper will also consist of the evaluation stage, analysis stage, and revision stage and describe the purpose and methodologies process for evaluating and revising a public policy.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Decision Making

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With freedom comes responsibility. When we first began sending messages through cyberspace, few anticipated that the digital footprint we were creating would follow us for a lifetime. Posts on Facebook that people make in junior high and high school impact hiringdecisions when they are 30.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Most generally, a necessary, natural or logical association or adaptation between ends and the means for their attainment defines rational behaviour (Boudon, 1982). Choice is said to be rational when it is deliberative and consistent. The decision maker has thought about what he or she will do and can give a reasoned justification for the choice (Ullen,1999). Therefore one expects that there will be no wild and inexplicable swings in the objects of their choices and that the means chosen to effectuate the goals of the decision maker will be reasonably well-suited to the attainment of those goals (Nozick, 1993).…

    • 3562 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rational choice perspective has a six core concepts and four decision making models: criminal behavior is purposive, criminal behavior is rational, criminal decision-making is crime-specific, criminal choices fall into two board groups: ’involvement’ and ‘event’ decisions, there are separate stages of involvement, criminal events unfold in a sequence of stages and decisions(Cornish and Clark). Criminal behavior is purposive when a person decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs and wants. Criminal behavior is rational when an individual commit an offense because of the benefits that might get despite how risky is their action just to achieve that goal. Criminal decision making is crime specific, it’s because each individual…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rational choice theory was inspired in the 1700’s by a man name Cesare Beccaria, whose utilitarian views and ideas were accepted throughout Europe and the United States. This theory is also known as rational action theory meaning the framework for understanding and often formally modeling social and economic behavior. It is the dominant theoretical paradigm in microeconomics. It is also the central to modern political science and is used by scholars in other disciplines such as sociology and philosophy. Rational Choice Theory is used by social scientists to understand human behavior. This theory is the belief that man is a reasoning actor who weighs means and ends, costs and benefits, and makes a rational choice.…

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Iron Triangle is a visual and written descriptive that defines how policy becomes law in the United States of America, and all 50 of its states. It begins with the formulation stage. This is where the people, The President of the United States, or Governor of one of the states introduce policy. This is usually brought about because of their agenda and is discussed with agencies and or departments for development and implementation. Upon research being concluded the policy is then considered for adoption by Congress. If it succeeds in getting adopted it is then passed into law, and scheduled for the implementation stage. This is where government executes an adopted policy that is specified by Legislation or the policy action. It is at this stage that various government agencies and departments whom are responsible for that respective area of policy are formally made responsible. This happens after a bill becomes law. Upon policy completing the Implementation Stage, It then moves to the Evaluation Stage. General judgments about cost, impact, goal attainment, program effectiveness, and quality are then determined. The is done because bureaucrats, community leaders, elected officials, policy makers, and the public want to know what policies work and those that don’t. It is through evaluation that we can determine whether a policy’s effects are intended or unintended, or whether the results are positive or negative for the target population and society as a whole. This concludes the 5 stages to policy making.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Policy Process

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As mentioned above, each step in the second part of the policy process has a unique purpose in policy development. The evaluation stage of the policy process determines whether or not the goals of the implemented policy are meeting the assigned objectives. “Through evaluation, it can be determined whether a policy's effects are intended or unintended and whether the results are positive or negative for the target population and society as a whole” (Pennsylvania State University, para. 3).…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Anderson J. E, Public Policymaking, 4th ed., Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, 2000. Dye T. R, Understanding Public Policy, 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998. Dunn W. N, Public Policy Analysis- An Introduction, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1994. Heineman R. A et al, The World of the Policy Analyst, Rationality, Values & Politics, 2nd ed., Catham House Publishers, Inc. Catham: New Jersey, 1997. Howlett M, and Ramesh M, Studying Public Policy, Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, Oxford University Press: Canada, 1995. Hughes O.E, Public Management & Administration: An Introduction (2nd Ed), Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, Wiltshire, 1998. Lindblom C, The Policy Making Process, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1968. Miyakawa T, The Science of Public Policy- Essential Readings in Policy Sciences 1, Routledge: London, 1999. Simon H. Administrative Behaviour, Second Edition, Macmillan: London, 1957. Simon, H.A. Models of Man, The Free Press: New York, 1957. Simon, H.A. (1979), "Rational decision making in business organisations", American Economic Review, September, pp.493-513.…

    • 2813 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In every corporation the crux of a manager’s charisma is his decision making prowess. Though there is an abundance of scientific theories and myths related to decision making, generally decisions are made in a highly rationalized context.…

    • 2448 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Policy Process

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The policy process is an ongoing event according to Kronenfeld (1997). When a policy is formulated there are two major parts; agenda setting and development of legislation. After these stages then the implementation stage begins. The way issues emerge can bring public awareness to a situation, such as the need for healthcare reform in the United States and eliminating the uninsured population. There are various stages of the policy process required to address this issue which include the formulation stage, legislative stage and the implementation stage.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The evolution of management has two approaches the classic approaches and the contemporary approaches. Several of the approaches overlapped each other as they developed, and lots of times had a significant impact on each other (Bateman & Snell, 2013). This essay I will focus on the contemporary approaches and the difference between them all. There are four contemporary approaches: Sociotechnical system, quantitative management, organizational behavior, and systems theory.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Linbdlom gives us the two distinct varieties of decision-making. One is called the rational comprehensive, namely root method, and another is the successive limited comparisons, that is branch method. There are definite differences between the root and branch decision-making. Normally, the root method is found in the traditional administration. Rational comprehensive has a clear distinction between goals and actions. It regards the goals as the premise of policy analysis. It always establishes the ends at first, and then, finds the means for achieving the goals. The root method also thinks the “good” policy is the best way to make the goals coming true. Like the name of rational comprehensive, it undoubtedly advocates integrated or comprehensive analysis during the decision-making. I think it is too much emphasis the role of theory.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational choice theory is based upon utilitarianism where individuals try to maximize utility or benefits and minimize costs. In other words individuals choose their actions based upon how much it benefits them. According to Hobbes this self-interest leads to competitiveness amongst humans which needs to be governed. According to this theory must create laws and rules to be obeyed to maintain social order as individuals are at the center of all the power. However rational choice goes on to state that the natural human selfishness and competiveness is actually what is best for society economically and socially, i.e. the invisible hand and through the creation of specialization. A popular criticism for rational choice theory is that assumes rational thought for actions and neglects the existence for any other kinds of action. Furthermore rational choice theory assumes any phenomena in society can be explained by and is the cause of individual action instead of social structures.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article explains the work of Simon and Lindblom’s on rationality and decision making. The article also talks about Substantive rationality which basically uses theoretical assumptions about the intention of ‘ economic man’. The Procedure rationality uses a set of informed and defined procedure to do decision making, believing that extensive information gathering and analysis would not lead to worst decisions. Simon’s Rationality model is explained here with…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alternativesto the rationalperspectivehave takenmany forms. One important set of alternativeapproacheshas stressed the political dimensions of decision-makingprocesses: many actors, diverse interests, interagencyconflict, and ad hoc coalitions. In political models of choice, decisions are not the productof calculatedchoices by a governmentor a company as a unitaryactor, but rather the outcome of a bargaining process among different players in a politicalarena. The model of bureaucratic bureaucratic politics postulatesthatconflicts of interest and power games between differentsections, departmentsand agencies within a governmentadministration the most powerfuldeterminants policy are of choices (Allison, 1971; Halperin, 1974; Rosenthal, 't Hart, & Kouzmin, 1991). The model entailed a definite break with traditionalperspectives of rational between politics and administration. One decision-makingand a strictseparation of the most intriguingvariantsof the political model focuses on the empiricalfact that on many occasions, the outcome of the process is such that no decisions are taken at all (non-decision-making). The analysis should then seek to explain why some social issues receive attention from policy-makersand are finally acted upon, whereasothersdon't. This takes the analystto identify the social, political and bureaucratic forces and barriersthat…

    • 3860 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays