Preview

Debate Final Exam

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Debate Final Exam
July 13, 2007
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Today our resolution is legalization of drugs does not damage society. We are on the negative group strongly against this resolution. Let’s look at the important points.

The affirmative team had four points: personal behavior, price, safety and management.
Their first point is personal behavior. They said that everyone has the right to choose his or her own lifestyle. It’s true. But one’s own choice should be based on social morality and within limits. If anyone just goes straight to do what they want, the society even the whole world will be out of control. The affirmative team didn’t consider this undeniable principle. In addition, taking drugs is not a good way to relax and entertain.
Their second point is price. They said that if drug was legislated by the government, the black-markets will disappear. It’s not necessarily true that the black-markets will disappear. Because many markets legalized still have black markets out of the government’s reach. They also said that the government would lower the price of drugs so that drug users will not be forced to do criminals in order to get the money for drugs. First, the government might lower the price but the degree will be limited, for the costs of drugs are still high and expensive. It remains a money problem for the drug users. So it’s not true that legalization of drugs will decrease criminals. Second, the lower the price is, the more drug users are.
Their third point is safety. They said that the pure heroin do very little harm to human body. It’s not true. Because no matter how pure the heroin is, it still does harm to human body for is a kind of medicine that has effect on human body. Not only that, drugs may cause both mental and physical disease, like cancer.
Their fourth point is management. They said that drug users increased year by year is because of the action of forbidding drugs. Actually, it’s the opposite. America is one of the countries who

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Many governments may struggle with whether to just decriminalize or legalize a drug entirely. Which is better for the government financially and more importantly the people? First we must understand the difference between decriminalization and legalization and the advantages and disadvantages. “Decriminalization does not mean that people can use drugs with impunity. But, possessing small amounts no longer lands the perpetrator with a criminal record or a jail sentence.” (Define Decriminalization) Before…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article entitled “Would Legalized Drugs Produce a Zombie Nation?”(Cederblorn and Paulsen, 332 - 334) written by Stephen Chapman. The author (Stephen Chapman) provides a clear details and analogy of the drug use and abuse in the American society. The article gave a picture of a theoretical view where the use of banned drugs is legitimized by the United States government. The unbelievable situation of having a legitimate way of circulating the proscribed drugs would create a lot of chaos in the communities and society in general.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They make several persuasive points showing that to allow using drugs getting some taxes in order to prevent illegal using. However, in his zeal to prove their case, they gloss over the seriousness of the its harmfulness and abuse.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A popular idea which many people use to object drug use, is utilitarianism. In utilitarianism, the main goal is to maximize the welfare of the composite, meaning the balance of benefits and harms should be equal, and the harms should never outweigh the benefits. If a utilitarian were to speak about drugs, they might argue that drugs should not be legal or used, because the harms outweigh the benefits (Sencerz, 2011). Their argument might be considered valid, but it cannot be concluded that it is sound. The premise for the conclusion, cannot be deemed for all instances, but it is reasonable to say that the conclusion lines up with the premises. This seems to be a reasonable way to view drugs, however, it fails to take into account that the government is doing more harm than drugs are. Given the issues with soundness, this utilitarian argument against drug use, should not be used to object it. If the government were to provide more rehabilitation and ways, or programs, for people to utilize in ceasing drug use and trade, it is probable that drug use, crime, trade, and disease related to drug use, will decrease. The government does provide rehabilitation and programs; however, the problem is that said programs and rehabilitations centers, are the first to be cut when budgets are low and they are not abundant (The House I Live In, 2012). There…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    So far this is good. However, Wilson also claims that keeping heroin and cocaine illegal contains the number of users, and so prevents a great number of harm. This is where I disagree. In Douglas Husak's, "Why we should decriminalize drug use", he argues against Wilson's claims. If frequency of drug use is a function of cost, then use will go up when as the cost goes down. and it is also true that economic models claim that cost will drop after decriminalization and would have an increase in use. But the predictions of cost and use after decriminalization assume that nothing else will change. However, many other things will change that could raise the price, reduce the use, and reduce the amount of harm that results from use. Therefore, the prediction of soaring use and harm is unsupported.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Bennett Drugs

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In William J. Bennett’s argument, Drugs: Should their Sale and Use Be Legalized, he tries to persuade the readers that drugs should not be legalized. He goes on to explain the national drug policy and the intellectuals that by and large are against it but have little to contribute to the matter. The argument like he says is a little one sided, there is a whole lot to say about the national drug policy and very little to say about the intellectuals.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    cultural misorientation

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    No value or moral system, no rules or expectations, or consistency concerning rules about drug prevention…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Similar to World War II propaganda, those statements should not be taken seriously since it is a way of getting into people. Additionally, people see it as black and white when it comes to these materials. For example, people determine that drug users are bound to fail in life. On the contrary, knowing the safety and having the moderation of using these items can ensure that people will not hurt themselves. People know the potential dangers of their hobbies, but with carefulness, they can succeed the way they use those objects. Which is why this gray area exists. Moreover, people will always find a way to get what they want. In 1920, there was a national prohibition of alcohol in America. Until the government abandoned the prohibition in 1933, people bootlegged their alcoholic drink and created organized crimes. Looking back to this, getting rid of these objects creates more and new problems. However, to benefit society people must give others the freedom of what they want. Look at how Colorado boost their economy with taxes from legalizing weed. Moreover, Mexican cartels' largest illegal drugs were the weed, but their business is badly crippled because the US legalized weed. Thus, simply allowing people to do what they want can have a huge…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Against the Legalization of Drugs,” by Peter de Marneffe, the argument that the use and possession of drugs needs to be decriminalized is made, because of the belief that the criminalization of drug use and possession violates the rights of citizens. In this paper, I will defend de Marneffe’s position by refuting a possible objection. Contrarians may claim that decriminalizing drugs will inevitably lead individuals to try harder and more dangerous drugs.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fundamental policy question concerning any drug is whether to make it legal or prohibited. Although the choice is not merely binary, a fairly sharp line divides the spectrum of options. A substance is legal if a large segment of the population can purchase and possess it for unsupervised use, and if there are no restrictions on who can produce and sell the drug beyond licensing and routine regulations. Accepting that binary simplification, the choice becomes what kind of problem one prefers. Use and use-related problems will be more prevalent if the substance is legal. Prohibition will reduce, not eliminate, use and abuse, but with three principal costs; black markets that can be violent and corrupting, enforcement costs that exceed those…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By enforcing a drug testing policy, the hope is to disincentive the appeal of drug use. The ever-present possibility of…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of legalization believe that if government regulates drugs such as cocaine and marijuana by imposing taxes, then the black market will be eliminated. However, the higher the tax rate, the higher the price of the drugs, and not many users can afford to buy high priced drugs such as marijuana and cocaine. Therefore, they will have to go to drug gangs who sell marijuana and cocaine under the…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cannabis Essay Thesis

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The argument continues, should marijuana be legalized? This paragraph will reveal the benefits of legalizing marijuana. The first reason is that keeping marijuana illegal is very expensive, studies have shown about $8.7 billion would be saved in law enforcement and another $8.7 billion would be generated from taxes, this statistic shows how much money the government is spending and could be done with the legalization of marijuana. The next reason marijuana should be legalized is because it has benefited people medically, peoples diseases have been treatable or relieved with the help of medical marijuana, diseases such as epilepsy, glaucoma, anxiety disorders and many more. In 2007 researchers reported that medical marijuana…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Legalization

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "The case for prohibiting drugs is exactly as strong- and as weak- as preventing people from overeating. We all know that overeating causes more deaths than drugs do... where do you draw the line?"…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays