Preview

Death with Dignity

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death with Dignity
Autonomy is a fundamental right. Liberty interests of patients while coping with terminal illness, however, unlike autonomy, are protected under the Constitution as fundamental rights. Advancements in medicine are extending the average life expectancy for adults. The aging of the baby boomer generation is also contributing to the increase in the growing number of the elder population. As society ages, not only do individuals battle terminal illness, but they combat the unanticipated demands on their right to die with dignity. The ability to choose the timing of one’s death is limited to a few states in America. Additionally, there are a few countries now allowing physician assisted suicide. Even with this option, a patient must exercise advanced planning. Death with dignity is an increasing concern for all members of society.
Euthanasia is a term meaning good death in the Greek culture. It is “the actual practice of preparing oneself for a dignified death” (Kiraly, 2012, p.335). Historically, several cultural beliefs favored euthanasia. Roman gladiators were encouraged to fight to their death with honor and dignity in Europe. While in Asia, samurai warriors fought to their death or committed seppuku, an act of suicide by one’s own sword. This type of suicide was honorable in the Japanese culture. Christianity took the opposing view and deemed euthanasia a sin. In accordance with Old Testament Judaism and Christianity, “the ‘certain’ death springs from sin, and it is nothing else than the payment, the punishment for sin. Thus it cannot possibly be anything that should be made better or easier” (Kiraly, 2012, p.336). The views of Hippocrates, a Greek physician, aligned with those of Christianity, and were instrumental in curtailing views on euthanasia. He developed the Hippocratic Oath, still in practice today, regulating the medical behaviors towards death with dignity. Medical practitioners, serving as moral interpreters, help with avoiding the



References: Durante, C. (2009). Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Palliation: Re-Evaluating Ronald Lindsay 's Evaluation of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. American Journal Of Bioethics, 9(3), 28-29. doi:10.1080/15265160802654160 Gentzler, J Harmon, S. E., & Sethi, N. (2011). Preserving Life and Facilitating Death: What Role for Government after Haas v. Switzerland?. European Journal Of Health Law, 18(4), 355-364. doi:10.1163/157180911X590210 Kiraly, V. (2012). Euthanasia, Or Death Assisted to (Its) Dignity. Philobiblon: Transylvanian Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research In Humanities, 17(2), 335-356. Nelson, N Stutsman, E. (2013). Twenty Years of Living with Oregon Death with Dignity Act. Gpsolo, 30(4), 48-51 van Gennip, I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Vacco Vs Quill Case Study

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court's decisions relating to marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, child rearing and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment. In particular, this Court's recent decisions concerning the right to refuse medical treatment and the right to abortion instruct that a mentally competent, terminally…

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He founded Oregon Death with Dignity Act in 1993. During the decade of the policy, there were definitive terms that defined the policy and what it meant to ‘die with dignity’. The state was torn into two, with the policy barely passing by 51% percent to 49% percent. There was much speculation and appeal on the policy creating a debate but with much hurdle, the federal court allowed the policy to become into effect. The entire idea of aiding in death enters in the 1900’s, showing that this issue has been constantly be questioned throughout history. I believe that educating the public about the policy and what the end-goal is for individuals with sound minds the right to choose. Involving physician’s care and expertise on if a patient is eligible and in control of their death is the hope. There were 5 states that this law is legal under the federal court: Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana, and New Mexico. Recently California passed this legislation in September 2015 but has not yet been taken into effect. History is in the making, and the goal of this act is provide dignity, comfort, support and…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Be smart, be strong, live honorably and with dignity, and just hold on” (Fray). Physician assisted suicide or better known as Death with Dignity isn’t your everyday topic or thought, but for the terminally ill it’s a constant want. The Death with Dignity isn’t something that all people or religions are in favor of and nor is the act passed in all states in the United States. Only three states in the U.S. today, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington offer their residents the option to have aid in dying as long as all the requirements are met. Death with Dignity doesn’t effect just the terminally ill person, but as well as family and friends around them creating many conflicting thoughts when opinion if Death with Dignity is truly moral and a choice…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court's decisions relating to marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, child rearing and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment. In particular, this Court's recent decisions concerning the right to refuse medical treatment and the right to abortion instruct that a mentally competent, terminally ill person has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For decades, the public, government, and physicians have been debating over the “Death with Dignity Act” or “Physician-Assisted Suicide.” It started back in the Ancient Greek and Rome time. The debate originated around the Hippocratic Oath and the condemnation of the practice. With the upsurge of Christianity, many physicians continued to condemn the practice. Within the last two centuries the public has spurned many discussions about Physician-assisted suicide and Euthanasia from many different historic perspectives (Procon.org, 2012). Although this debate has been lengthy and many of the issues discussed over the centuries are repetitive, new ideas and concerns do emerge with the current debate. What do you think when you here assisted suicide? Would you want your family member to suffer with an illness that has put them in so much pain that they cannot function? Personally, I would not want to see my family member suffer in pain while they are dying with no cure.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    References: Arthur E. Chin, M., Katrina Hedberg, M. M., Grant K. Higginson, M. M., & David W. Fleming, M. (1999). Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon- The First Year 's Experience. The New England Journal of Medicine , 577-583.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A state’s prohibition on assisted suicide, like all homicide laws, advances this interest. The Supreme Court concluded that the state of Washington had the right to decline to make judgments about the quality of life that a particular individual may enjoy, and the state could certainly conclude that all persons’ lives, from beginning to end, regardless of physical or mental condition, deserve full protection of the law.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being terminally ill and being told by a doctor that there is only have six months left to live and that those next six months will wither the body down to nothing through pain and suffering. Physician-assisted suicide could save many Americans from this nightmarish reality that terminally ill patients face today. If physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia was legal in the United States, months of suffering and a loss of dignity and autonomy could be spared. Therefore, physician-assisted suicide, in the style Oregon employs, should be legalized and available to suffering patients across the United…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial bioethical issue that has been increasingly debated in recent years. Advocates of physician assisted suicide argue that it champions patient autonomy and reduces suffering while opposers suggest the benefits outweigh the risks and that there are other acceptable alternatives to the practice. This paper attempts to demonstrate the permissibility of physician assisted suicide as a regulated, medically reliable end-of-life option that can help end the suffering of individuals struggling with terminal illnesses. This will be achieved while still providing a comprehensive view of both opponents’ and supporters’ perspectives on the issue, specifically regarding the nature of the death that comes…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Currently, in the United States, 12% of states, including Vermont, Oregon, and California have legalized the Right to Die. This debate around whether or not to help patients who have terminal illness end their lives has been and is still far from over. The definition of Right to Die is, “an individual who has been certified by a physician as having an illness or physical condition which can be reasonably be expected to result in death in 24 months or less after the date of the certification” (Terminally Ill Law & Legal Definition 1). With this definition, the Right to Die ought to be available to any person that is determined terminally ill, as determined by a professional.…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Preface to 'Would Legalizing Voluntary Euthanasia Lead to Abuses? '." Euthanasia. Ed. Carrie Snyder. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 6 Mar. 2012.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Euthanasia

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most people want to live their life with dignity and die with dignity. People make important choices and decisions through out their life. Some of these decisions are very difficult and even life changing. We live in a democratic society where we are free to make these decisions. Death is an unavoidable event and happens to everyone. Death can be quick or it can make our love ones suffer miserably. Some people become very ill or have devastating physical problems they must deal with daily. They have a constitutional right to refuse treatment. Most patients trust in their doctor to help them deal with their illness. As their suffering increases, their self-respect decreases. A person should have the freedom to end their life if they are mentally capable and tired of suffering everyday. A patient should be allowed to end their life with dignity.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia summary

    • 2421 Words
    • 7 Pages

    suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Origin: early 17th cent.…

    • 2421 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In present day society, people fight for rights. The right to be equal, to be free, to vote, and the right to live; yet, we often forget about the right to die. Many people mistake euthanasia as murder. This could not be further from the truth. Murder is the intentional killing of a person who involuntarily has their life taken away. Euthanasia, however, is the assistance to release one imprisoned in their own body, to put family members at peace, and to cut down medical costs.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays