The Death Penalty:
The Headquarters of Controversy
The death penalty is one of the most controversial topics of modern day. There are many people on both sides of the fence in this heated debate. I, personally, am pro death penalty for many reasons. The death penalty is a dire part of the U.S. criminal justice system that should not be extinguished. There is irrefutable proof on why we need the death penalty. The problem with the death penalty is it needs to be reformed. Death penalty reform is the sine qua non of an effective compromise. 35 of 36 of the states that allow the death penalty, and the U.S. government, use lethal injection as their primary method. Lethal injection euthanizes the convicted felons. Many argue that this method is in humane because it may be causing the felons pain. Yet, Euthanasia is considered humane enough for us to use it on pets and other animals. Those sentenced to the death penalty have usually been found guilty of committing a heinous act, and lost many appeals. Should we really be that considered if they feel a little pain as they pass away? Think of the pain felt by their victims and the families of those victims because of the acts of that one individual. The death penalty is a needed part of our correctional system. On the other hand, I feel our capital punishment system does need reform. I feel that those convicted of a crime without scientific or forensic proof should just receive life without parole. Leaving them on death row costs tax payers more money than having them in prison for life. Many criminals still waiting on death row are said to have committed crimes back as far back as the 70’s. The fact that these people committed these crimes is still disputable. Criminals of the 21 century who are on death row were found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt with the assistance of physical and forensic evidence. These criminals should remain on death row. The time it takes from being on death row to being...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document