Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty
The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The death penalties are usually carried out for retribution of a heinous murder committed, such as aggravated murder, felony killing or contract killing. Every state handles what method they want to use to put a person to death according to their state laws. The death penalty is given by lethal injection, electrocution; gas chamber firing squad and hanging are some of the ways that certain states may carry out their death penalty procedures. I will present some views and personal opinion dealing with the pros and cons of the death penalty. The death penalty is such a life altering subject that affects all parties’ lives that are involved in the death penalty process. I personally have mixed feeling about the death penalty. I don’t know really if I would be a person that would support the death penalty or not. I do feel that murdering someone is wrong, and since no one really close to me has never been murdered. I don’t know if my feeling would change as being a supporter for the death penalty or not. I can only pray that God will help this county to make the right choices when comes to life or death. Fig. 1. The Peace Keeper of PHAET Courtesy (RV)
The media uses great power in our society as a way to get information out to the public. This could have a great influence on the decision process of a death penalty case. Journalists, radios, TV, and news media not only talk about evidence, but also help to decide what issues and stories publics chat about. Many crimes that are committed get wide spread mass media coverage. This can cause problems for all sides involved in handling such heart wrenching casing like death penalty cases. The crime squad officers involved in criminal cases may become entangled with the media in the process of providing evidence about a death penalty case. Mass media exposure of a trial, particularly cameras in the courtroom, can affect the actions of witnesses and adjudicators decision about death penalty murder trial. Media coverage can be a good thing and sometime media coverage can cause negative effect on all parties involved in death penalty cases being prosecuted.
Pros of the death penalty, if someone murder another person and were proven guilty then whether there is a place in modern society for old fashioned principal of “an eye for an eye” is a matter of personal opinion. A cold blooded murderer is someone who premeditates a murder, kills without any remorse, mercy, deliberate, unprovoked and regard to taking a life. I agree with the law being carried out to prosecute the criminals and if it take the death penalty to remove them permanently from society to make this world a safer place then by all means the death penalty should be used. According to the death penalty information center 33% of U.S. public prefers the death penalty. Also when a murderer is put to death the family members of the murder victims feels the death penalty is seen as some sense of closure for them losing their loved one. The death penalty is a very real punishment rather than some form of state mandated treatment program. The criminal is made to suffer by being put to death for the offence that he/she has commit. Some may question if the death penalty stops others murderer from committing crime. It is a very difficult fact whether it doesn’t. It is certainly not used as a deterrent, but purely in my opinion as a form of permanent punishment. Fig. 2. Courtesy of Death Penalty Information Center
There are a number of arguments against the death penalty. The opposing advocates that are against the death penalty may argue that killing another human being for a crime of violence is not the right thing to do. They may argue that when you put someone to death you are committing murder yourself. The advocates that are particularly against the death penalty might believe that...