The world will keep turning, but not in this room for this individual. Death Penalty or capital punishment is the sentence of execution for the crime of murder and some other capital crime (serious crimes especially murder, punishable by death). The death penalty was practiced in the United States from since colonial times until today. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, 1,289 people have been executed as of this date. 1,115 of which were executed by lethal injection. This is said to be the least painful method of death compared to the other methods of execution, such as the electric chair and firing squad. Lethal injection kills the condemned person more quickly, thus they will not suffer for long periods of time. (Office of the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney) The death penalty is not even popular among the public, yet it is still practiced. The death penalty is ineffective and it should be abolished. This is because it does not accomplish the goals that it was created to meet; it does not deter crime, it is more expensive than life in prison, and it violates the 8th Amendment of the Constitution.
Punishment by death seems to have been operating and well known since the beginning of human society. Micheal Davis, Professor of Philosophy at American University, argued, among other things, that, unless capital punishment was necessary to protect society against harm, it should be abolished by modem states in order to promote the progress of civilization (Reiman). In spite of the growing acceptance of the death penalty as the best punishment for certain kinds of crimes such as first degree murders, there are still some people who argue against it on certain grounds. How can society look to make a difference or tell individuals that violence is not the key if their killing individuals because of a mistake? For America to be called a land of freedom and equal justice, the death penalty is not the way to handle things because you’re getting, “eye for an eye and tooth for an tooth”. This brings the topic to ask, “What if someone kills your mother or any family member, would you want that victim to face the penalty or just prison”. Would you want to see the victim suffer? The death penalty is not a just punishment to anyone who have to face it, or who have purposely taken someone life. When stating this, two major conflicts can simply arouse. First, it is known to be almost impossible to return the exact hurt someone has done to you, vengeance is not the best decision. For example, how would someone have punished Osama Bin Liden, one who committed genocide against many individuals? Second, this seems to conclude that any punishment which is equivalent to the crime is morally acceptable. It would dictate that it is alright to rape the rapist or torture the torturer. The Bible states that “whosoever shades man’s blood by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made He man.” (Genesis chapter 9 verse 6). This shows that in the bible the first murder was Cane, not executed, but expelled for his life. However, the idea of killing someone is a complete error and can lead to more problems. Elimination of the death penalty will be a great decision and the comfort of our society because: it can be a wrongful conviction; risk of killing the innocent, the poor will always be victims because they cannot afford good lawyers, racial prejudice is an issue in death sentencing, the cost for the equipment for the death penalty is expensive and possibly overwhelming, the death penalty cannot stop murders and killing does not give chances for criminal to change. Nevertheless, the death penalty is known to put down individuals and be the ultimate punishment to many killings and horrific cases. A lot of times when someone is facing a crime, the treatment is never fitted to the offender which can be considered as intermediate sentencing. The U.S. is almost alone when facing capital punishment for juveniles....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document